dark light

Peter G

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 803 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Super Hornet buy to be reconsidered. #2506129
    Peter G
    Participant

    The RAAF can also return the F/A-18F at the conclusion of the lease to the USN. The plan was for 4 squadrons of F-35A or 3 squadrons of F-35A and one of F/A-18F (if they are retained) – a decision would be made in 2014.

    The idea is to keep costs low by the replacing the attack F-111 with the attack F/A-18F. To the point were they are remaining with standard USN weapons -AIM-9X, ATFLIR, AGM-154. No expensive adding new weapons

    F/A-18F enters service in 2010 and would be returned in 2020.

    If they approve the F-35 late this year supposedly 75 F-35A would be delivered 2014-17. In service date would be 2015. The final 25 would be delivered 2018-20.

    The order would probably be for 75 firm F-35A with 25 options. In 2014 they decide to either retain the F/A-18F or order the 25 options.

    Yet another option would be to return the Super Hornets and only have 80 operational in 3 squadrons (not the preferred option).

    49 (with 20 options) are getting the airframe extension for a further 9 years life (HUG 3.2C) from 71 aircraft. 11 aircraft would be worked on at one time.
    Non-HUG 3.2C go 2012-15 (this is 22 aircraft) – note the F-35A dates above.
    HUG 3.2C go 2017-18 (option to extend out to 2020).

    The F/A-18F lease makes perfect sense with the early retirement of the F-111 in 2010. BTW the F-111C was due to go 2015-2020. It was always going to be replaced by the last batch of F-35A.

    in reply to: Su-27 questions #2507315
    Peter G
    Participant

    Cool pictures.

    Any ideas on the fuel and ranges for the Su-30MKI and Su-30MKK?

    in reply to: Spanish and other navies Never where ships #2097966
    Peter G
    Participant

    What sonar will the Polish Gawron be fitted with?

    in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2508166
    Peter G
    Participant

    Problems with land attack Klub being integrated to Indian fire control.

    No problems reported with anti-shipping Klub.

    in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2508229
    Peter G
    Participant

    Latest CFW says the Iranians boats aren’t fitted yet.

    The Russians have been very good when it comes to arms transfers – the Indian and PRC Klub purchases were not secret….

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2098328
    Peter G
    Participant

    The French ASMP has an anti-shipping mode. Update the inertial guidance before launch. Missile speed and target range means little movement before impact.

    In the case of the Kh-15, range 150 km and speed 1480 m/s = 101 seconds. At 30 kts the carrier has only moved 1.5 km. The warhead is 350 kT – so inside the kill radius.

    Each Tu-22M3 can carry 6 internally and further 4 externally.

    Naturally the Tu-22M3 still have to get within 150 km before firing (low altitude launch is 60 km BTW). Once they have fired though the 40 km altitude is higher than the 30 km SM-2MR engagement altitude (that is whole point of the aero-ballistic Kh-15).

    in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2508313
    Peter G
    Participant

    Kh-101 guidance

    Janes Strategic Weapons Systems 18 July 2006
    “Guidance in mid-course is inertial with Glonass and terrain comparison updates. The terminal guidance uses TV/IIR image comparison, with an accuracy believed to be between 10 and 20 m CEP…. The aircraft mission control system is known as ‘Sprut’, and the mission planning system as ‘Sigma’. “

    Sprut and Sigma are the systems fitted with the existing Tu-16MS16

    Soviet Long Range and Naval Aviation missiles (Sergei Moroz and Sergei popsuevich, pg 86:
    “It features independent passive astro-correction guidance with optical and thermal picture monitoring and perhaps a laser altimeter”

    Terminal guidance sounds like DSMAC.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2098386
    Peter G
    Participant

    Why do you keep asking about US AShM’s?

    Kh-15 is a potent weapon, but one that makes its large and valuable launch platform vulnerable and whos effectiveness is likely being rapidly eroded by ship based AD systems intended to take out high diving missiles. You are looking for a magic bullet where there is not one.

    Kh-15 are currently being retired. In any case only three regiments of Air Force Tu-22M3 were so fitted.

    The two ranges are probably for low altitude and high altitude launch similar to the US SRAM. Moroz and Popsuevich give the range as 150 km with 40 km high cruise. Only the inertial guided version entered service. The Kh-15S anti-shipping and Kh-15P were projects only.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2098903
    Peter G
    Participant

    SS-N-19

    The missiles are programmed before missile launch with satellite/aircraft radar and ESM picture before launch. The scout missile distributes fire automatically. The seeker is three channel – LPI search, passive then active attack. Again the salvo would drop below the radar horizon once the targets are designated.

    Defences are radar warner, radar jammer and does evasive maneuvres. Again the missile has some armour against gunfire and missile frag warheads.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2098904
    Peter G
    Participant

    SS-N-12 Mod 1/P-500 Bazalt and SS-N-12 Mod 2/P-1000 Vulkan

    Each salvo of 8 communicates between themselves. One msl goes high and unfolds its active radar. This scout missile allocates targets amongst the salvo (supposedly 50% carrier, 50% escorts) – part of this is due to multi-channel guidance ARM/TARH seeker, then goes radar silent and drops below the radar horizon. Once they cross the radar horizon they go active again and switch on the self defence jammer (each missile has its own jammer). The target allocation is probably by the missile operator.

    The P-1000 has an armoured titanium warhead (to defeat gun systems), increased range, speed and improved jammer.

    Supposedly the P-1000 has replaced the earlier P-500 on the Slava cruisers.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion Part-2 #2098922
    Peter G
    Participant

    Tu-22M3 [Backfire C] and Kh-22NA [AS-4 Kitchen]

    Theres approximately 100 Tu-22M3 with the Air Force and 50 with Navy (35 Northern Fleet, 15 Pacific). It was doctrine for Air Force to be capable of anti-shipping missions and moving aircraft across the country was planned in wartime.

    The Kh-22NA was fitted with a video link back to the launching aircraft – the operator can see the missile image and designate the target. Against non-carrier forces the Backfire would remain below the horizon whilst providing control of the missiles.

    They would also fit some of the Kh-22NA with noise jammers vice warheads/seekers. These would escort the standard missiles to the target.

    The improved Kh-32 is also on the way or has entered service.

    in reply to: Swiss F-5 tiger replacement #2509457
    Peter G
    Participant

    Typhoon can takeoff (reheat/military power)
    air to air (17 t): 450/900 m (has demonstrated 250 m takeoffs)
    multi-role (20 t): 715/1370 m
    long range strike (23 t): 760/— m

    No idea on landings, but would be less than above?

    How long is the typical Swiss runway?

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world #2509912
    Peter G
    Participant

    January 22, 2008: The German Army has received the first of 80 Tiger HAD helicopter gunships.

    Germany has the UHT version with mast mounted sight, HAD is planned for France and Spain.

    The Tiger slowly entered service five years ago.

    First UHT was delivered for training April 2005. Around 15 were used for training at EFA in France by 2007.

    The six ton Tiger has a crew of two and a max speed of 280 kilometers an hour. It cruises at 230 kilometers an hour, usually stays in the air about three hours per sortie. It is armed with a 30mm automatic cannon, 70mm rocket pods (19 rockets per pod) and various types of air-to-ground missiles (eight Hellfire types at once). It can also carry four Mistral anti-aircraft missiles.

    UHT lacks 30mm and will be armed with Stinger vice Mistral. Missile will be TRIGAT.

    France HAD on other hand has 30mm cannon, 68mm rockets, Hellfire and Mistral.

    in reply to: Swiss F-5 tiger replacement #2511660
    Peter G
    Participant

    The new Swiss fighters are required to back up the F-18C/D in the fighter role (Swiss Hornets are tasked as pure fighters – 25F-18C and 8 F-18D aren’t enough to provide 4 aircraft at 24-7 QRA for longer than 2 weeks with international exercises, maintenance and training) and replace the F-5E in the ground attack and recon roles.

    The timeframe is to replace the F-5E sometime from ~2010. This rules out the Gripen NG.

    About the only contender not ready to fulfill the above is the Eurofighter in the recon role , but the Israel Recce Lite is form and fit for the Litening in any case, so not a show stopper.

    Swiss F-18 will complete the Upgrade 21 with APX-111 IFF, MIDS and JHMCS with AIM-9X next year. Then its Upgrade 25 with ALR-67(v)3 RWR and 20 ATFLIR pods. They might end up with SHARP recon pods fitted with SAR at some stage, which would pull the recon role to the F-18, with the new fighters taking up the fighter and attack roles.

    in reply to: Famous Russian Aircraft series #2513120
    Peter G
    Participant

    Flanker book questions

    Does the FRA Flanker book have much on the ranges and fuels (in litres not kg!) of the different versions?

    Same on radar ranges (km/nm vs xx m2)?

    I’m looking at getting the book in any case.

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 803 total)