dark light

Peter G

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 803 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale news II : we go on #2514275
    Peter G
    Participant

    The Rafale’s premier weapon is supposed to be the AASM, so I suppose it’s not a priority to integrate an LDP?

    Nic

    Apples and oranges.

    Rafale B/C operational with SCALP EG in June 2006; Typhoon possibly 2012-14.

    Rafale B/C operational with laser guided weapons (GBU-12/22) in Feb 07 and GBU-24 planned for early 2009, Typhoon (EPWII) in Jul 08 with EPWIII planned for 2010.

    Rafale B/C operational with GPS guided weapons (AASM) in 2008, same for Typhoon (EPWII).

    Rafale B/C operational with targeting pod (Damocles) in Feb 09, Typhoon (Litening III HE) in Jul 08.

    Rafale B/C with ASMP-A, Reco NG recon pods in 2009; Typhoon no requirement for either.

    in reply to: RAM Block 2 info. #1789085
    Peter G
    Participant

    RAM (Rolling Airframe Missile) has two canards and a rifled launch tube which spins the missile. The two canards are used as rudder or elevators as required.

    RAM Block 2 has 4 fins and the plan is to remove the helical lands (rifling from the launcher).

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2039133
    Peter G
    Participant

    Aw, I’ve seriously shead a tear!

    I mean really….

    I served on Adelaide including in 1997.

    Glad to hear she will become a diving wreck, although I would have preferred her to be expended in survivability trials as a parting shot.

    Goodbye old girl.

    in reply to: Ability of RuAF and Russian Navy to destroy US CBG #2514317
    Peter G
    Participant

    I’m fairly sure the Kh-101 uses TERCOM and DSMAC which means land attack only.

    in reply to: CVF #2039303
    Peter G
    Participant

    any idea what engines it would have been fitted with would it be Parson boilers like the WW2 ships or something different

    New. 4 sets of Y300, each 45000 shp.

    in reply to: Australia's first A330 MRTT #2516879
    Peter G
    Participant

    How much work would it be to re-equip the entire fleet with actual Hose and Drogue system on centreline boom?

    No need as they have hose drogue units under the wings. Not suree if they have the clearance to tank 3 Hornets at once in any case.

    The RAAF wanted about double the number, but were limited by budget.

    They can carry 293 passengers and 8 pallets. They are not MRTT as the upper deck is currently passenger only – again a concession to budget. They have provision for an upper deck cargo door, so probably in the future along with comms relay and hardened upper deck floor.

    They are due to be fitted with Link 16 and LAIRCM (IR jammer).

    The 5 aircraft order covers two deployments, each two aircraft plus one spare. This is also as two fighter CAP orbits at 216 nm (5 fighters) and deploying 12 aircraft to Butterworth.

    F-111 goes 2010, so it might miss. Still leaves F-18A/B, C-17 and Wedgetail, F-35A.

    Depending on future purchases also F/A-18F, F-35A and P-8A Poseidon is fitted to be refuelled. I’m fairly sure the KC-30B can also refuel another KC-30B

    in reply to: Royal Navy FSC two tier thing or whatever it is called now #2039468
    Peter G
    Participant

    Currently the RN has 8 Sandown single role minehunters and 8 Hunt Minehunters. ISTR someone mentioned 4 of these operate as patrol boats. This leaves 12 in the MCM role.

    Sandown
    Blyth and Bangor expended 30 Seafox C anti-mine torpedoes operationally in 2003. Destroying a mine was found to take 1/4 the time compared with using PAP.
    The entire class are to be fitted with Seafax (24 C anti-mine and 4 I inspection) vice PAP ROV 2007-2010.

    Hunt
    In October 2005 the sweep gear was removed to shore at 30 days notice to reinstall.
    From around 2006 theya re being fitted with Sea Fox as above.
    From 2009 they are planned to be fitted with REMUS recon UUV -REMUS was also operationally used in 2003.
    They might be fitted with and USV with sweep in the future.

    Anti-mine torpedoes can be deployed over the side of any ship, a specialised MCM is not required. This handles the destruction.

    UUV are safer, quicker and cheaper than standard minehunters.

    In the near future there is no need for specialised minehunters, although trained operators are still required.

    Training with Sea Fox, USV and UUV can be peformed from shore bases – ship deployments are required. In fact the USN plans on operating some of its remote MCM from shore bases for local defence.

    in reply to: Royal Navy FSC two tier thing or whatever it is called now #2039475
    Peter G
    Participant

    Probably a little out of date, but a few years back (before 1999) with 35 DDG/FF provided for 7 escort sized commitments:
    1) Standing Naval Force Atlantic (withdrawn in March 2004)
    2) Standing Naval Force Mediterranean
    3) Fleet ready escort (UK waters)
    4) Atlantic Patrol North – Caribbean
    5) Atlantic Patrol South – Falklands, West Africa
    6) Gulf
    7) Indian Ocean

    In more recent times this is:
    1) Standing Naval Force Mediterranean (probably to NRF)
    2) Fleet ready escort (UK waters)
    3) Atlantic Patrol North – Caribbean (July to October Hurricane season)
    4) Atlantic Patrol South – Falklands, West Africa
    5) Gulf/Indian Ocean

    1) & 5) are possibly C1 taskings; 2) could be anything; 3) & 4) are C2 & C3

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news II #2522092
    Peter G
    Participant

    Does anyone have an official RAF or news link for the T.3 and FGR.4 designation for the Block 5 and on? Tried a Google search and only got forum postings….

    in reply to: Tu-22M4 Backfire-D? #2522127
    Peter G
    Participant

    Thanks for that Peter, do you mind if I ask what your source is? I assume that the internally carried Kh-55’s were to be carried on rotary launcher modeled on the one from the Tu-160. Does anybody know if there are any images available of this aircraft?

    I assume that you mean NK-32 engine as the NK-93 is propfan?:confused: Furthermore I have never heard of a Kh-57, the Kh-65/Kh-SD would seem appropriate.

    Piotr Butowski’s article in Air International December 2007.

    Its definitely the Kh-57, which would have longer range compared with the Kh-65 – in any case both were canceled.

    Yeah is would be NK-32 engines….

    in reply to: Tu-22M4 Backfire-D? #2522432
    Peter G
    Participant

    Tu-22M4 was 1983 project for Tu-22M3 airframe with NK-93 engines from Tu-160. It would have carried Kh-32 vice Kh-22 and 10 subsonic Kh-57 (conventional variant Kh-55 – 6 internal, 4 external) or UPAB-1500 gliding TV bomb. One prototype in 1990, work ceases Nov 91.

    in reply to: Harrier II (Plus) #2526222
    Peter G
    Participant
    in reply to: CVF #2041423
    Peter G
    Participant

    Who says she’ll get steam cats? Might be EMALS.

    Check out 2/3rds down: http://navy-matters.beedall.com/pa2-3.htm

    “…two American manufactured C13-2 steam catapults – 90 metres long (nominal power stroke of 309.7 feet) and able to launch aircraft at over 150 knots. The catapults will be powered by an auxiliary steam generating plant…”

    in reply to: CVF #2041542
    Peter G
    Participant

    Currently the F-35B is expected to have a 920 km radius with 2 GBU-32 and 2 AMRAAM, withe the same weapons the F-35C is expected at 1190 km (F-35A is 1160 km). Or a 270 km difference….

    The Lightning II in RAF/RN service is programmed to carry:
    Internally: ASRAAM, AMRAAM, Paveway IV, Brimstone (dual or triple carriers), SPEAR (possibly Paveway IV with wingkit)
    Externally: AMRAAM, Storm Shadow, Paveway IV, Brimstone, drop tanks, SPEAR

    The PWIII/EPWIII is to be retired 2017 and cannot be carried internally by any F-35 versions- the smaller GBU-31 can be carried internally by the F-35A/C.

    in reply to: Eurofighter vs Su-35 #2539698
    Peter G
    Participant

    South African HMS

    I thought it was South Africa in 1979?

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 803 total)