dark light

DH106

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 91 through 98 (of 98 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Bomber not PE8 #1346366
    DH106
    Participant

    Yes – think the correct designation is DB-2A.
    Only 12 built according to Gunston.

    in reply to: IMAM Ro 37 wreck discovered in Afghanistan! (link) #1346453
    DH106
    Participant

    The gear leg visible behind attachement to a bit of wing behind the fuselage in the foreground of the 2nd piccie is of a different type. Looks something like the leg of an Anson or similar.

    in reply to: Russian Bomber not PE8 #1346563
    DH106
    Participant

    Thanks Robert – I’ll look that one up tonight.
    I’ve never heard of it before !

    in reply to: Russian Bomber not PE8 #1346628
    DH106
    Participant

    I had a good browse through Bill Gunston’s excellent “Encyclopedia Of Russian Aircraft” last night and he notes against the Pe8 that it was the only Soviet ‘Heavy’ bomber developed during the Great Patriotic War (i.e. WW2) – which implies that if the above ISN’T a Pe8 then it was developed after WW2 (I think it looks too ‘modern’ to be pre-WW2 Soviet), or even that perhaps it isn’t Soviet at all.

    Notwithstanding what I said in my previous reply, there are some very stark similarities here with some versions of the Pe8 illustrated (sleek, slim curved outer engine nacelles, general cockpit & front end shape, single fin) – which leads me to lean towards it probably being some possible experimental version of the Pe8 ? However the turrets (or whatever) beneath the outer nacelles are definitely unusual & non-standard.

    robert.wright46 – what makes you say it isn’t a Pe8 ? Intrigued now!

    in reply to: Russian Bomber not PE8 #1346780
    DH106
    Participant

    Hmmmm – definitely has the look and feel of a Pe8 (the variant with no radiators beneath the outer engines), but there are some notable differences…..
    Note how the main gear legs appear more or less vertical – whereas on the Pe8 there’s a distinctive rearward sweep.
    Are those gun turrets under the outer nacelles?

    in reply to: Can you ID this 1970s TV kids drama #1347047
    DH106
    Participant

    Well well, I can’t be as daft as I look!

    Adrian

    Well……… how could you be ! :p

    Sorry – couldn’t resist, school quips are all coming back to me 😮

    in reply to: Question about the Boeing 707… #608257
    DH106
    Participant

    The little inlets above some/all of the engines are for the engine driven compressors that pressurise the plane etc. The number of them depends on the model 707/720.

    707-300 models with the P&W engines generally have 3 on engines 2,3 & 4 – hence engine 1 has a different ‘simpler’ pylon.

    720 models have 2 only, on the inner engines.

    707-400 models have the RR-Conway engines have them on all 4 engines – but these seem smaller and more blended into the general shape of the pylon.

    in reply to: Convair 990 preservation #1355349
    DH106
    Participant

    I think one of the Spantax ones is ‘preserved’ at Palma.

    Glad you put preserved in quotes – she’s in a terrible state 🙁
    She’s supposed to be owned by the “Museo Del Aire” at Madrid – but they’ve obviously had a problem moving her to the mainland from Palma… so here she rots……

Viewing 8 posts - 91 through 98 (of 98 total)