dark light

John Boyle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 318 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What I hate about East Kirkby ;) #1598924
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Looks like a great airshow. A Lancaster and the Red (turning to orange) Arrows.

    in reply to: Elvis 24/7 #1973725
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Elvis forever????

    Listening to that, i’d be caught in a trap.
    I can’t walk out!

    Suspecious Minds….His best song along with Kentucky Rain.

    A true Elvis story that has something to do with aircraft. In the mid-50’s my father, an USAF major at the time, was attending Lockheed’s F-104 maintenence course in Burbank.
    He’s at the bar at the Knickerbarker Hotel and who’s sitting there but Elvis.
    Elvis says Hi and autographs a picture book for my two sisters.
    Dad swore it was true.

    John Boyle
    Participant

    Vacuum

    I believe some helicopter rotor blades have used a similar principle to detect cracks.

    in reply to: Who is the most famous person that you have met? #1973766
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Brush with fame…

    Aside from politicians famous in the US only, mine all have something to do with aviation….

    Bob Hope, U.S. actor and comedian…now they’ve named an airport after him.
    Jimmy Stewart, actor and WWII Liberator pilot based in Norfolk.
    Ed White, astronaut, first American to walk in space. Killed in 1967 Apollo 1 fire.

    But one of my biggest thrills was meeting the neice of the Wright Brothers, Ivonette Wirght Miller. Her attorney husband was the executor of the Orville Write estate. She was in her 90s when I met her…and it sounds corney but it was an honor to meet someone who knew the brothers from her childhood until Orville’s death in 1948.

    My autographed book collection includes Orville Wright, Charles Lindbergh, Jimmy Doolittle, Mustang ace Don Gentile, aviation author Ernie Gann, astronauts John Glenn, Neil Armstrong, Alan Sheppard, Frank Borman.
    And Chuck Yeager….

    in reply to: Repatriation???? #1602272
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Pac 750xl

    Thanks for the update on the Fletcher…it originally came out in the 50s.
    You’re right, they are marketing the 750XL here, they’ve sold a couple to skydive operators.
    We were sorry to hear about the loss of the prototype when it ditched off the west coast on Christmas. It was an appearent fuel delivery problem.
    A USCG Hercules was on the scene and saw the plane ditch but the pilot never made it out. The company say’s it won’t effect North American deliveries.

    in reply to: What I hate about East Kirkby ;) #1602341
    John Boyle
    Participant

    When the chips were down….

    Is that not a WW2 burger van for feeding the aircrew when they come back from a sortie?

    They picked it up on a raid over Hamburg.

    in reply to: What's the USAF's plans for the mighty F-15E? #2679297
    John Boyle
    Participant

    the people who are pushing the fb22 really have a greater agenda in mind which looks at long term. i think the airforce has allready decided on that a Single platform willl replace the 2 platforms. but as of this time i would agree with you that the production and setting up of the f/a-22 should be a paramount need. the airforce and LM are also trying to show off that the f/a-22 is more flexible as a platform and with considerably less money required for completely new development can be developed into a FB22.looking at the future i dont think there is an immediate need to replace the strike eagle.

    Agree! I interviewed the ACC commander (now chief of staff) Gen. Jumper a couple of years ago about the eventual replacement for the B-1, he was keeping his options open, UAV, small platform, large platform. This was before the push to spin off the F-22. The USAF fighter community would sell their grandmother for F-22s. and the USAF is keen to spread out the R&D costs with other uses.
    But unless tghey can put the JDAM and JSOW into the FB-22, the AF will have to keep the B-1 around for another 20 years.

    in reply to: Martin aircraft #1602692
    John Boyle
    Participant

    XA-22 Maryland

    http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/attack/a3/a3-22.htm

    I checked with the USAF Museum site and indeed theUSAAF bought Maryland for testing….the XA-22. The company paid for R&D.
    They did not buy a Baltimore, but paid for the RAF Leand Lease aircarft.

    in reply to: Had to happen sooner or later… #1602754
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Now I’ve seen everything…

    It’s a cute little sucker. And better looking than most sub-scale Mustangs.
    Can’t wait for someone to build a plywood mini-Vulcan.

    in reply to: Martin aircraft #1602766
    John Boyle
    Participant

    No Marylands or Baltimores

    No preserved Marylands or Baltimores remain…of course they could be some piece out there used as a potting shed in Suffolk, but no complete airframes.
    They were not used operationally by the USAAF (they may have been evaluated, but I doubt it). I hate to say anything with 100% authority because 1 or 2 may have shown up in USAAF markings as a squadron hack or target tow AC. They were developed before the US entered the war, but the time the US did, the A-20, B-25, B-26 were available.

    The B-26 is as close the US came to scrapping aircraft to extinction (outside a few limited production AC like the B-32).
    I saw the CAF B-26 when it was painted in San Angelo, Texas back in 1985 and a few years later saw Week’s plane at Chino. Great looking ships. I understand there is another almost complete example of the B-26 in storage (probably at Chino) that came from the same place where Week’s plane was found (Alaska, if memory serves correctly).
    The USAFM example came out of a school in France. And I don’t know how much of “Flak Bait” the NASM has aside from the nose.

    in reply to: Repatriation???? #1602912
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Firstly – A point of fact, New Zealand did actually have an aircraft industry during the war, and it still does.
    The prototype Turbo Fletcher was a recent case here in NZ. Probably the most important development in agricultural aircraft in the Southern Hemisphere.

    The Fletcher was originally designed in the U.S., but it does deserves to be in New Zealand because it was fully developed, maunfactured and used there. Again, put planes where they wil be appreciated.
    I’m glad the Zero is popular in NZ, but if you look in the book by Marachat (Sp?) about surviving Japanese planes, it’s a shame more of them aren’t in their own country.
    And don’t get me wrong, I’m really glag Kermit weeks preserved the Sunderland…Weeks is a true hero of the historic aircraft community all of us owe him a big debt, and Florida is as good place to keep the plane as any, especially since it’s accessable to the historic plane fans who are in the neighborhood anyway when they go on Holiday to Orlando.
    The USAFM isn’t a bad place for the Mosquito…but there could be a better place, especially, if it were to be made flyable. Right now, I’d rather see a whole Mosquito at Duxford than Dayton….even though I live closer to the latter. Why? Because the typical Duxford visitor will appreciate the plane more than the typical USAFM visitor and the Mossiue meant much more to the RAF than the USAAF.

    in reply to: US pilots breaking neutrality #1603959
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Wink, wink, nod, nod….here’s your ticket to Canada

    From what I understand (I was too young to be there) most facets of the U.S. government didn’t care about people breaking the neutrality laws.
    If you go back in popular media…magazines,radio news broadscasts, films, etc. people like the Flying Tigers were seen as heros and people identied with the English during the Battle of Britain.
    In reading the autobiography of fighter ace Don Gentile, he didn’t mention any government inetrference when he joined the RCAF.
    While the OFFICIAL government stance was neutality, the pervailing stance of the government was to support the UK and its allies.
    After all, the Lend Lease Act was law, and there were no restrictions of sale of military goods to the Commonwealth (delivery via U.S. flag ships were regulated to avoid U-Boat attacks). If the U.S. were REALLY against helping the U.K., I’m sure they would have passed some laws blocking the sale or giving of war material. FDR certainly supported the war…and his party held a majority in both houses of the U.S. Congress.
    Somewhere I have a great photo of a Hudson being delivered to Canada on a field in North Dakota….towed across by a horse team.

    in reply to: US pilots breaking neutrality #1603999
    John Boyle
    Participant

    Some US newspaper owner had been stirring up public ill feeling about the Kiwi and Aussie pilots being trained in Canada, and he said many of the Americans he met treated him and his mates awfully, and they called them names like baby-killers.

    The newspaper publisher was Robert McCormick, a staunch isolationist…along with Lindbergh and a few others. Members of the group “Am,erica First” ranged both extremes of the political spectrum, some were far left, others far right. While the isolationsts were a minority, they were a very vocal group. They in no way represented the majority of U.S. public opinion prior to Dec. 7, 1941.

    in reply to: Round-the-world pilot lands in trouble #2679991
    John Boyle
    Participant

    What’s the worst that could….?

    BOOO! Russia sucks!

    He shouldn’t have landed, what’s the worst that could happened?

    I don’t know …what’s the worst that could happen?
    Oh yeah, ask the crew and passngers of KAL 007, and the KAL 707 shot down in the 70s. Not to mention varoius SIGINT and ELINT planes…and a few lost transports shot down over the years.

    Having said that, an ultralight vs. a MiG 29 and their AAMs sounds like an opening scene of a James Bond film.

    in reply to: What's the USAF's plans for the mighty F-15E? #2680011
    John Boyle
    Participant

    F-15e

    I’d think for the forseeable future the F-15E will be the deep strike aircraft. The high cost of the F-22, let alone the proposed F/B-22, is so high I don’t think they’ll have enough funds to use them as a Strike Eagle replacement.
    Right now, the Air Force will consider itself lucky if it gets enough F-22s for the air-to-air role.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 318 total)