dark light

hypersonic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 199 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725410
    hypersonic
    Participant

    If anybody is still reading this thread….

    I can recommend the International Bomber Command Centre (IBCC) as another place to obtain research data. They have a search engine on their website based around what it says on the tin.

    They have won a number of awards, for their charity work, since opening in 2018 and are based on Canwick Hill overlooking the very fine Roman city of Lincoln.

    H

     

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725414
    hypersonic
    Participant

    Thanks, I’m surprised that the Microsoft search engine didn’t find your document. I didn’t check National Archives directly – I was not to know that, that would have provided a “positive result”. Quite frankly I didn’t understand the status / baseline of your document. Perhaps an explanation at the start would have helped. We don’t all know everything!

    Kew is on my list of places to visit when I can find the time. As is the National Aerospace Library at Farnborough where I have a few archived documents, written on this very keyboard.

    All that said no other reliable source I checked complemented the content of Air 29/587. Plus some of the F540s I spoke about came from Kew, via a third party.

    Kew, will accept documents for archive that indicate a historic value. They have no way of knowing the correctness or completeness of same. I always treat with caution, by cross checking, as well as an injection of the grey matter – no matter the source.

    H

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725420
    hypersonic
    Participant

    Sabrejet,

    I don’t know what your quoted document Air 29/587 is. I can’t find it anywhere. It seems to have led you in a certain direction ie ORTU being at RAF Thruxton. Have you used any other document(s) to back its evidence up?

    I have used a number of sources (books and websites) to look for your document and evidence that the unit was at RAF Thruxton ALL TO NO AVAIL.

    What you see in my previous posts is my thought processes being presented in script. That is how I work. You can see my answer and how I got there. In other words my workings out.

    In Dec 1943, the early D-Day plans would have been a very closely guarded secret. Only for very senior people to know about. Juniors wouldn’t have been afforded that knowledge. Hence my use of the term “that is a fact”.  You could also say why would you / they move a unit to another location in the middle of tight program of events – if they did move of course. Such an action could be seen as bad management. 

    As a side issue but never the less, an example, I have spent the last weekend going throu’ 1500x F540s relevant to the Battle Of Britain. The amount of obvious errors is frightening. I have had to use the grey matter to sift through the clutter or chaff to obtain the true picture. However, I accept these documents were created in the “thick of war”. Just as your document Air 29/587 presented data or report possibly was. 

    At the end of the day my narrative is based on what I find when I go looking. Everything needs to be X-checked to ensure the true picture is emerging. Rather than just relying on one single source.

    H

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725711
    hypersonic
    Participant

    Could it be the unit moved from Thruxton to Hampstead Norris for a role change during Mar / Apr 1944. The word “formed” to me means fully established so hence the slip of a month or so (to move) is not unreasonable. Although, I don’t have any evidence, here, to support their being at Thruxton in the first place.

    Any activity at Thruxton, in Dec 1943, would certainly not have been in support of D-Day – that is a fact!! Best capable team to do the job / role, at such short notice, and Hampstead Norris the best place to do the training I guess.

    The surprise to me is 27 Sqn – but that is a personal thing.

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725728
    hypersonic
    Participant

    The Albermarles are from the Operational Refresher Training Unit (ORTU). Involved in pre-D-Day training. About 20 of the aircraft type were on strength at the time. As somebody has already said the unit was formed 1 Apr 1944 – which makes the task a bit of a rush job. It was never given a “unit number plate”. The correct title for the station, back in the day, was RAF Hampstead Norris.

    The ORTU is still around today – its called 27 Sqn (Chinooks) – small World!! It “arrived” there via 240 OCU. 

    Pre 1944, the stations role was operating Wellington’s in the European theatre and preparing same for ferry to the Mid-East.

    H

    in reply to: This Forum #726215
    hypersonic
    Participant

    It is meant as tongue-in-cheek!! However, the search engine genuinely did return that answer. 

    in reply to: This Forum #726256
    hypersonic
    Participant

    It is an inside job..

    An IT geek working in the back office at HQ. I put Vahe.D into Microsoft Search Engine the top reply was “Historic Aviation Key Pubs”. I’m no IT expert but that does for me!

    in reply to: Trolley Acc Indicator Disc #726264
    hypersonic
    Participant

    No probs,

    I was Air Electrical and later Avionics. So was in and out of various Battery Bays as a “junior”.

    Later flew a desk in an Eng Ops – so had oversight of their activities.

    H

    in reply to: Trolley Acc Indicator Disc #726274
    hypersonic
    Participant

    I started my first posting, in the RAF, in 1975. As seen elsewhere in this Forum.

    In my experience Battery Bays would close for the night at about mid-night.

    I never in my time 1975 – 1999 ever saw any type of charging outside of working hours. I think OC Eng Wg would have something to say if it did. In most cases the Duty Electrician was a day shift duty and on call through out the evening and night. Not to be confused with the Battery Bay team manning which I believe had their own shift pattern(s).

    Different stations, in my experience, had different policies re the storage of fully charged Trolley Accs. But generally speaking each hanger would be entitled to one with two or three spares to cover re-charging and routine maintenance. Hence RAF Scampton which had four hangers had an entitlement to seven.

    in reply to: Trolley Acc Indicator Disc #726411
    hypersonic
    Participant

    Quite frankly having spent many years using Trolley Accs. I would draw the following conclusions.

    1. The main cover is from Scampton Trolley Acc No7 and the smaller cover, over the control box, is from Scampton Trolley Acc No4.
    2. The white disc is an unofficial mod, in my view, never seen before!!
    3. Your Point 2 has no sense – for charging it would be returned to the Battery Bay. To be charged during open hours only. Ie not overnight.
    4. I’m afraid I don’t understand your Point 3. Which order of what? At the time of use there were at least 7x Trolley Accs at Scampton.
    5. Underneath the main cover there would have been 4x very large capacity 6v batteries connected in series = 24v. The Trolley Acc would have been provided with a very “large capacity” cable and fitted with a NATO standard connector. This was used to connect the Trolley Acc to the aircraft DC external power supply connector. The same cable and connector was used to re-charge the batteries when required. When not in use the connector would be stored in the storage box to the left of the main cover (as we see it in the picture).
    6. Your Point 1 seems to be the most logical use of the disc – but very much an over kill in my view.
    in reply to: KC-135 goes low level through the Mach Loop 20 Aug 24. #726745
    hypersonic
    Participant

    Very impressive.

    I’m certain “The Bloody One-Hundredth” also flew in the Mach Loop earlier in the Summer or Spring this year. However, didn’t see any pics of it.

    Edit – it happened 9 May 24. Details on Key Aero website Military News Archive. 

    hypersonic
    Participant

    P-51 Mustang, G-MRLL, on take-off from Cotswold A/P (Kemble) and headed South today at 12.15 UTC. 

    in reply to: 70th Anniversary of the First Flight of the P1A #727572
    hypersonic
    Participant

    During a typical working day the first jet would up by 08-15 and we often flew until 01-00 the following morning. With the nightshift hoping to fix all the snags in order that the next days flying program can be met. Busy times!!

    I had forgotten about ‘937 – she didn’t “come back” that day. She was a 11 Sqn jet – I was on 5 Sqn.

    trumper – I’m afraid I don’t do Facebook.

    Accident English Electric Lightning F6 XS937, Friday 30 July 1976 (flightsafety.org)

    in reply to: Road Running Shorts Tucanos #727806
    hypersonic
    Participant

    A mate of mine, who lives in the Cambridge area, says he saw 6 Tucano’s on three trucks also Eastbound on the A14. He can’t remember the date but it was either 10 or 11 Jun 24. Something strange going on!!

    in reply to: 70th Anniversary of the First Flight of the P1A #727810
    hypersonic
    Participant

    There was a few red faces among the painters and finishers team – it was put down to the surface not being prepared correctly.

    I can’t get the link to work – it is returned with the message content isn’t available.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 199 total)