dark light

martinez

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,048 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2353938
    martinez
    Participant

    Canon EF 100-400MM IS.

    It was a crap day and I’m strictly amateur

    Ken

    An amateaur?, me too..:) I`m using prime canon 400mm, but waiting for the mother of all telephoto lenses the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4 L IS USM with built in extender 1.4x ..:D
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-200-400mm-f-4-L-IS-USM-Extender-1.4x-Lens-Review.aspx
    Btw. nice pictures, anyway I remember friday at MAKS 2009 staying under Zhukowski tower listening their sunday forecast.

    beautiful sunny day, blah, blah, blah…

    if you were there you know how it turned out to be.:D:D

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2353941
    martinez
    Participant

    http://jury-tver.livejournal.com/82422.html

    Another good photo report from Torzhok. Good interior shots of Mi-35Ms, as well as the other new attack birds of the RuAF.

    Black cockpit, kind of NVG compatible with proper interior lighting, but I`ve heard that even the interior turquoise green doesnt interfere with NVG.
    http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6403/121237152.e7/0_893da_70e04e86_orig

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2353991
    martinez
    Participant

    A couple of my photos from MAKS 2011 to keep you amused…

    More from MAKS here

    Ken

    what lens are you using Ken?

    in reply to: NEW CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER SIGHTED #2353992
    martinez
    Participant

    Yes I remember how people accused me of photo-shopping in a compressor face into the T-50 prototype picture πŸ™‚ Yes, I remember that too. I was right on the T-50…99% of the time. Still am.

    Still the S-DUCT fetishism? The T-50 compressor face is visible so far, what a big deal. If they do not need S-DUCT, they probably found out easier and better solution to absorb RF energy inside the duct than curving it and making it complicated. We have to be patient and wait until T-50 come out fully equipped.

    in reply to: bye bye stealth? #2354236
    martinez
    Participant

    Here is what LM says about their own BiStatic radar system.

    Notice that the number one performance dependent factor is “geometric diversity”, which means that you need the transmitters spread around.

    While that “may” be true of earlier RAM/RAS, the F-35’s RAM is specifically designed to defeat a broad range of EM bands (as public patents show).

    No, as the transmitter’s location is not known.

    Are you aware that the US is developing an airborne bistatic radar?

    thanks, found this…

    ERA’s PET technology, Vera-NG by ERA, is a mature technology deployed in Asia, Europe and the Americas, which tracks aircraft, vehicles, and other targets based on passive tracking of emissions, including radars,jammers , IFF transponders, DME/TACAN interrogators, Datalink and other communication, navigation and surveillance systems..

    http://era.aero/solutions/military-security/

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2354255
    martinez
    Participant
    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2354258
    martinez
    Participant

    Peru’s MiG-29SMP . Single seaters photographed for the first time (hopefully better pictures will appear).
    http://www.defensa.pe/showpost.php?p=315555&postcount=6188

    IFR probes like the UB-SMP 047 seen a few months ago. Gray cammo.

    PS: There’s a picture of an UB-SMP in flight also :
    http://www.defensa.pe/showpost.php?p=315777&postcount=6218

    they are changing appearance to grey as well…:rolleyes: ..nice though
    http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv47/FeNZeR_1/DSC_1196.jpg

    http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t264/Cesar_del_Peru/migs_.jpg

    in reply to: bye bye stealth? #2354260
    martinez
    Participant

    So somebody has invented passive radar…..again…..and stealth is dead……again!.

    Would you need to hit every cell tower, radio station etc in the region you wanted to fly your LO through?. No you might choose to target power generation/distribution facilities though. Knocking out power should cut down on the multitude of RF sources quite dramatically at strike +2hrs or so as the UPS’s discharge!. PCLS is dependent on the passive radar mapping the RF background before the opposing air target transits through. Suddenly robbing it of several of its reference emitting sources will play merry hell with resolution. .

    Hypothetically speaking, they still could have back-up generators enough to power emitters ensuring RF returns from passing intruders. What is the true value of a stealth fighter then when firstly in a war conflict you strike ground targets like electric power plants, TV, radio stations with a vast number of tomahawk cruise missiles, then you fly in with the F-22 to a cleaned air. Do not be agree with me, stealth is a waste.:D

    in reply to: bye bye stealth? #2354261
    martinez
    Participant

    Developers and operators of purpose-built stealth airplanes are not crying in their beers. RAM and RAS provides attenuation of RF scattering no matter where the emitter and receiver are located.

    Passive coherent location, the technology mentioned in the article, has been around for 15 years, so this is nothing new to designers and operators of stealthy airplanes.

    The off-board emitters used by PCL are not a reliable RF source in a conflict. PCL is also susceptible to broadband jamming. When coupled with reduced RF scattering, relatively low power jammers can protect a flight of stealthy airplanes when operated properly. It is a matter of extremely low signal to noise, with RAM and RAS reducing signal and jamming increasing the noise floor beyond what a receiver can discriminate.

    If I understood correctly emitter location doesnt matter, different frequency matters, coz RAM ans RAS are not much multi band capable, are they?
    I think PCL is from since 80ies, the name Tamara radar you`ve heard already, probably developed countering uncle Sam stealth. Since then every big player in this world is developing or operating PCL systems to counter stealth.
    Regarding broadband jamming covering stealth, doesnt it even provide more food, more signal for the PCL system in order to find what doesnt want to be found?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355347
    martinez
    Participant

    Have Slovaks ever got any R-27Ts, at all? Somehow I cannot find a single picture of a Fulcrum armed with this missile.

    No one ever got R-27T, except Algerians(Peruvians) I think when they received old 9.13 from Belarus. Check for their topic here at this forum, there are pics of R-27T. The APU-470 launch rail is equiped with a nitrogen bottle (for colling the R-27T seeker) you check every day, how ironic when you do not have the missile the nirogen bottle is for….:D

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355388
    martinez
    Participant

    Now let’s have a look at the reality 2012

    Any questions ??

    reality is even worser than it looks right now and talking about Slovak airforce is insulting…:mad:

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355418
    martinez
    Participant

    The fact that you say ‘malfunctioning’ must mean that the glass(?) has gone opaque for some reason??

    I assume it has something to do with its properties – same as why unmaintained/unreplaced windscreens also exhibit the same ‘browning’??

    (You can see that I’m not technically minded…..)

    Ken

    Close, no reason to be ashamed, the fact is that the glass has gone opaque from inside, not ouside. Trapped air humidity condensed/freezed on inside glass surface when climbing into altitude making the glass not transparent, meaning the monoblock 13S/01 of the KOLS-29 is no longer hermetically sealed, faulty and malfunctioning. I;ve seen water droplets inside the glass ball when parking on a ramp on some Fulcrums. Better I;m not talking about engines and other critical aircraft aggregates, bcs the KOLS is just an iceberg, the RSKMiG servicing and spare parts logistics has been catastrophic for years right know. No wonder why Poland, India and even Bulgaria have the same experiencing with RSK.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355525
    martinez
    Participant

    IRST ball is not clear ????

    Ken

    Hats down Ken πŸ˜‰ , but explain on principle why it is not clear?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355530
    martinez
    Participant

    holy 2008s! and since then they underwent a different modernization program in 2009 called the Model 2020 program that seeks to replace the MiG-29s.

    No program yet to replace the Mig-29.period.

    in reply to: J-20 further along development than PAK-FA? #2355561
    martinez
    Participant

    But still, welding is till the most common way for steel and most metal works.

    Is there any better upcoming tech to replace riviting in airplane manufacturing, in the future? it got alot bad caractaristics…

    Depends on materials used in the aircraft structure. Many aluminum alloys in the industry do not like welding as the temperature anneals the affected area, decreases strenght. They are machined or forged and then heat-treated, after they obtain in the hardened state a high strenght properties,then they`re joined by using riveting metods. Quite extensively used when joining aluminum structures is automated spot welding for large fuselage panels of airliners, e.g. most of Mig-29 front fuselage aluminum skin is spot welded as well as the whole fuselage fuel tank structure-mid fuselage section (check picture below), rest is riveted, bolted . Mig-29 CFRP skin parts were also riveted what is seen to be not the best joining methods due to brittle nature of composite structures. As the use of composite structures in aircrafts are increasing, some new joining methods are very slowly replacing riveting and bolting like adhesive bonding, but I doubt riveting will soon disappear from the industry.

    inside spot welded Mig-29 fuselage fuel tank, the pipe is DSMK fuel level trasmiter, next to it is the hydraulic tank no.2

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,048 total)