detonating cord, to be fired during the ejection sequence
what about this one, mig-21 cockpit, is this the detonating cord as well?
Um…say whaaaat?!:eek: Do tell us more please, who’s (what position he has) the person who told you all this , and who are those new MiG-35s for then? RuAF? RuNavy ( well where the hell are the hooks then)?
Thanks.:)
Be patient, we have to wait and see. This info came to me from a colleague who discussed that with RSK people. I`m also wondering whether it is true or false. Supposedly, Syrians never acquired something like that below, they wanted to modernize their izd9.12 only. RSK just finished the Mig-29 upgrade in Syria and there was no effort to buy new aircraft version at all. Those new variants izd7.41/7.47 are company demonstrators so far and are domesticated for RuAF only. I think the article in TakeOff also supports this theory with this sentence.
it is still a prototype :cool:.those guys on forum are just fan boys,dont be excited by their statement :rolleyes:
it was sukhoi that copied j-11 and made su-27 from Chendu :rolleyes:
Be honest, this is a bit disappoitment at least to say, I think the whole aviation community expected more from Sukhoi, Russia`s leading fighter design bureau than this stealthy feature crippled Raptorski. That`s my opinion, well I hope they can prove me wrong. Looking forward to see the fourth prototype of the Russian PAK-FA fifth-generation fighter.
RAC “MiG” delayed the modernization of the Peruvian fighter
http://www.avia.ru/news/?id=1329916155
Can somebody explain it, if the Mig Corp. busy with some unknown secret projects or why they complain about the lack of work?
I;ve been told past week that RSK recently finished deal in Syria modernizing their Mig-29 fleet with SMT package and that those new built Migs35 izd7.41/7.47 at Zhukovski were not designed for Syria, nor any foreign customers.
What I’ve found worrying is the complete lack of any sawtooth edges on the aircraft structure in all T-50 prototypes so far.
Sure, there are other ways to achieve stealth, but if it helps, why not…
Sawtooth edges are there to solve problems with spanwise flows and boundary layers over wings and stabilizers, so if you do not see any on the T-50, that means no problems so far, why are you worried about?. :confused:
Airbus fuselage sections receive an additional coat of grey paint on the lower interior areas, where water from the cabin air collects after condensing on the cold metal while flying at altitude.
It might be also some kind corrosion inhibitor coatings, widely used in the aircraft MRO as well, but usually they are transparent, not grey. They are applied on the interior paint though.
its called wishful thinking on the side of Chinese aviation fans. Chinese aviation is less transparent than Russian one. more mysteries there, yet lots of optimistic assumptions. You don’t see Sukhoi rolling out Pak-fa’s in full paint trying to hide certain things.
Well, but now when owning the whole USA they are catching up quickly bcs of technology transfer, I think the J-20 is just an example of that, dont you think?
That’s an interesting topic for two reasons, actually.
1. I don’t think all the grey areas are composite in these MiG pictures, the only ones which certainly are should be the lightest (CFRP) and darkest (GFRP or AFRP) panels. At least some of the medium grey areas are probably painted metal though, for example I doubt the wing skins have been switched to composite.
2. Do we have ANY reliable sources on what parts of the J-10 airframe are composite? The Chinese primer schemes seem to give little if any indication, you could argue that the green parts sometimes seen could be non-metallic but more often than not those are areas where you wouldn’t normally expect composites.
I agree, in case of the Mig-35M2 I think integral wing fuel tanks are welded structure now as well as the fuselage FT no.3, risky to fly when in bare/anodized metal and needs to be treated asap for the sake of safety by an external coating. It is also visible that they are treating other areas with a light layer of that grey paint.
I dare to say that J-10 airframe possesses very little composite materials, but they could prove me wrong.
Despite a considerable quantity of modernised Su-25SM the beginning of deliveries of Su-25UBM, the main draught horsy there is an old shabby Rook: .:)
Pity for the low-res picture Max, did you take this picture with your old Pornoslonik FZ camera?;):D
greetings from Slovakia
if your country ended up buying Hokums..
Yup, you would wonder how close to truth the digi Hokums might be during their special visit in 1996. 😀 Ten years later digi fulcrums rolled out from the hangar doors behind Kamov helicopters. My colleague told me that Kamov company tech.personal were giving a crash course in Ka-50 maintenance and flight preparation to our people.
Thanks for info, out of curiosity how often do Slovak MiG-29s push past Mach 2?
due to the russian spare part servicing and maintenance support which can be stated to be catastrophic for several years now, the failure rate is prety high and in order to put the a/c into service they fly all kind of test flight programs very often, one of which includes reaching a/c max. mach speed.When engines are good or tuned correctly and pilot doesnt screw up the flight profile, he reaches speeds over M2 very quickly.
Yes, the Slovak MiG-29 digital camo is just superb!
.
thanks
It is damn unique! I like it.
I read somewhere that the paint was not a very good kind and peeled off real fast, and military did not really want it. Any truth to that, or just nonsense rumors?
There were problems with the paint system applied, it blistered a peeled off during high speed dashes only(>M2,2) when the aerodynamic heating was greatest. Up to M2 speeds no harm was done to the paint at all. A kind of pre-paint surface preparation problem, they found out and solved it by repainting the aircraft again. Some latest pics of the second one.
http://russianplanes.net/ID65653
I agree Deino, that MiG-29 scheme just looks plain, but it is a trainer.
http://russianplanes.net/ID65323
This MiG-29K looks much better with the black contrast.http://russianplanes.net/ID57609
http://russianplanes.net/ID46758
Here is a single seat MIG-29 in that Lipetsk grey, looks better than the UB.http://russianplanes.net/ID53071
Another grey variant, and a different scheme behind it.
Russian MIG-29s still have a huge variety of paint schemes.While we are at it, I think this looks far more “professional”:
http://russianplanes.net/ID45865
when talking plain, boring, not boring or profesional grey-grey paint schemes, what do you think of this Mig-29 camo ? 😀
http://www.planephotos.net/photo/351/Slovakia-Air-Force_Mikoyan-Gurevich-MiG-29AS_0921/
http://i.planepictures.net/96/98/1282027440.jpg
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/5/1/1/1763115.jpg
This is one of the sexiest aircraft designs ever…:)
I am gathering all the information I need to make a model of the new, black/brown camo Su-34 – so thanks to Martinez for highlighting the new/revised parts.
Ken
you are welcome Ken, looking forward to see your new model. I wonder what kind of color you`ll use to paint the upper surface of the Su-34. It seems that even the “VVS Rossiya” marking on the fin was slightly moved down….:)