dark light

kev35

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,041 through 5,055 (of 8,395 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: more censorship? #1942181
    kev35
    Participant

    Webmaster.

    Thank you for your consideration. It is appreciated. I’m sure if we could move to a level playing field things would improve. I believe you have to accept that there are problems among the moderating team as it stands. I have made my opinion clear to you before. This forum is too precious to lose as it is such a fantastic repository of information.

    Thank you again for your openness. Let us hope that increasing dialogue can resolve some of the problems the forum currently faces.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: General Discussion #371169
    kev35
    Participant

    Webmaster.

    Thank you for your consideration. It is appreciated. I’m sure if we could move to a level playing field things would improve. I believe you have to accept that there are problems among the moderating team as it stands. I have made my opinion clear to you before. This forum is too precious to lose as it is such a fantastic repository of information.

    Thank you again for your openness. Let us hope that increasing dialogue can resolve some of the problems the forum currently faces.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: General Discussion #371190
    kev35
    Participant

    Thank you webmaster.

    So, to reflect this new spirit of openness and dialogue would you reconsider removing the ban from Robbo while a civil discourse continues which I am sure we would all prefer? This dialogue with you, the Webmaster, is something which we are all no doubt grateful for, and something which was sadly lacking in the past.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: more censorship? #1942185
    kev35
    Participant

    Thank you webmaster.

    So, to reflect this new spirit of openness and dialogue would you reconsider removing the ban from Robbo while a civil discourse continues which I am sure we would all prefer? This dialogue with you, the Webmaster, is something which we are all no doubt grateful for, and something which was sadly lacking in the past.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: 50 Years On #1942190
    kev35
    Participant

    Even the civilians Mark? The children and innocents who, along with the guilty were swept away? A nation is nothing without it’s people and I can’t believe it’s people deserved it. Not saying I disagree with the usuage or agree by the way. Just a thought.

    Best Regards, Steve

    Yes, even the civilians. Neither Britain, the Commonwealth or the United States asked for a war with Japan. Japan wanted war, they got one. Did the Japanese ever show concern for the civilians they encountered? Of course they did. With the women they had to decide whether to rape them before they killed them. With the men they had to decide on whether to use a bullet or bayonet, and that is precisely how far the compassion of the Japanese extended.

    As I’ve said previously, my only regret is that it couldn’t have been deployed several years earlier. Do you honestly think the Japanese mindset would have had them prevaricating over the use of the atomic bomb had they built one first? Of course not. They certainly wouldn’t have felt any guilt over it either. Why must we persist in trying to stigmatise those who successfully fought and won a war that shaped the lives we live today?

    The use of the atomic bomb effectively ended the war, and saved millions of lives, both from the Nations who would have had to invade and among the Japanese.

    I have no feeling of regret that the devices were used. If you, personally, have any doubts, spend a night reliving through nightmares what a prisoner of war of the Japanese endured. I have.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: General Discussion #371205
    kev35
    Participant

    Even the civilians Mark? The children and innocents who, along with the guilty were swept away? A nation is nothing without it’s people and I can’t believe it’s people deserved it. Not saying I disagree with the usuage or agree by the way. Just a thought.

    Best Regards, Steve

    Yes, even the civilians. Neither Britain, the Commonwealth or the United States asked for a war with Japan. Japan wanted war, they got one. Did the Japanese ever show concern for the civilians they encountered? Of course they did. With the women they had to decide whether to rape them before they killed them. With the men they had to decide on whether to use a bullet or bayonet, and that is precisely how far the compassion of the Japanese extended.

    As I’ve said previously, my only regret is that it couldn’t have been deployed several years earlier. Do you honestly think the Japanese mindset would have had them prevaricating over the use of the atomic bomb had they built one first? Of course not. They certainly wouldn’t have felt any guilt over it either. Why must we persist in trying to stigmatise those who successfully fought and won a war that shaped the lives we live today?

    The use of the atomic bomb effectively ended the war, and saved millions of lives, both from the Nations who would have had to invade and among the Japanese.

    I have no feeling of regret that the devices were used. If you, personally, have any doubts, spend a night reliving through nightmares what a prisoner of war of the Japanese endured. I have.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: General Discussion #371210
    kev35
    Participant

    …..However, this is a discussion forum. There is no particular reason why standards of moderation should not be discussed, though I, for one, would now shift this to GD.

    Moggy

    But that’s been precisely the problem. No explanations will be given, the decision of the moderators is final and it seems irrevocable. Then when people disagree about a standard of moderation the threads have been locked or disappeared. By deleting such posts/threads how can you say that standards of moderation can be discussed? That has not been the case until webmaster has allowed this thread to stay open today.

    Move it where you like, but if the Moderators and Webmasters are now open to the idea of listening to those expressing discontent, keep the thread civil and above all, keep it open.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: more censorship? #1942192
    kev35
    Participant

    …..However, this is a discussion forum. There is no particular reason why standards of moderation should not be discussed, though I, for one, would now shift this to GD.

    Moggy

    But that’s been precisely the problem. No explanations will be given, the decision of the moderators is final and it seems irrevocable. Then when people disagree about a standard of moderation the threads have been locked or disappeared. By deleting such posts/threads how can you say that standards of moderation can be discussed? That has not been the case until webmaster has allowed this thread to stay open today.

    Move it where you like, but if the Moderators and Webmasters are now open to the idea of listening to those expressing discontent, keep the thread civil and above all, keep it open.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Flight Captain Bernard Short. #1356455
    kev35
    Participant

    Thanks Ian.

    If anyone has any clues on the activities of 14 Ferry Pool and the detail thereof, can they please put me on the right track. The ORB for that unit appears not to have survived, or at least not reached the NA at Kew.

    The more I learn, and there’s NO doubt this forum has played a very significant part in that learning process, the more determined I become to get to the bottom of each investigation. Carrying out some of the less glamorous duties, the men and women of the ATA are no less deserving of our respect. It must have been an incredible challenge flying so many varied types of aircraft without the benefits of the Conversion Courses given to service pilots. Although less at risk from enemy action, the hazards encountered during ferrying, both aircraft that were new and those that had been damaged, were comparable to those of Service crews. Perhaps this is why the story of Flight Captain Bernard Short has touched me so much.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: more censorship? #1942311
    kev35
    Participant

    Flood Warnings…..

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=39606

    Is the Historic Forum operated and governed on the same basis as GD? Or are there different standards? The thread above clearly shows posters being given more than one warning before being banned.

    Unless of course the cynical among us might suggest that a moderator might be lenient to one member because of a perceived previous relationship?

    I fully understand that the powers that be will take absolutely no notice of the feelings and opinions of the wider community, but perhaps they should reconsider reinstating Robbo and paying more attention to the root cause of all these problems, an immoderate, self obsessed moderator.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: General Discussion #371505
    kev35
    Participant

    Flood Warnings…..

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=39606

    Is the Historic Forum operated and governed on the same basis as GD? Or are there different standards? The thread above clearly shows posters being given more than one warning before being banned.

    Unless of course the cynical among us might suggest that a moderator might be lenient to one member because of a perceived previous relationship?

    I fully understand that the powers that be will take absolutely no notice of the feelings and opinions of the wider community, but perhaps they should reconsider reinstating Robbo and paying more attention to the root cause of all these problems, an immoderate, self obsessed moderator.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Flight Captain Bernard Short. #1357597
    kev35
    Participant

    On wednesday August 10th, at 12:30pm, a wreath of poppies will be laid on Flight Captain Short’s grave at Ringway Churchyard on behalf of his son, also Bernard. Some members of the Commercial Forum will be present. Anyone in the Manchester area wishing to attend is more than welcome. Photographs will be added to this thread after the event.

    In a most heartening gesture, PaulF has offered to place flowers on the grave of Captain Short’s Flight Engineer, Arthur Bird, at approximately the same time at Edenbridge Cemetery. Anyone wishing to attend from that area please email Paul to confirm times. It is fitting that both of these men will be remembered at the same time.

    Next week, there will be a further announcement regarding Flight Captain Short and Senior Flight Engineer Bird. For the moment, the research continues.

    Thanks again to everyone who has helped in the research so far. Bernard, the son of Flight Captain Short, has asked me to convey his gratitude to you all.

    Kind Regards,

    kev35

    kev35
    Participant

    PC or not, here’s my stance.

    As far as I am aware, it was the Japanese who launched attacks on Pearl Harbour and Singapore. The Japanese wanted a war, they got one. Before anyone points out to me the total number of Japanese civilians killed by the atomic bombs, I have to declare here, I have as much interest in that as the Japanese Government did when they decided to go to war. The Japanese had no thought for their opponents and treated civilian prisoners just as badly as military ones. An Uncle of mine fought the Japanese and saw how fanatical they were. My Father and another Uncle would have been involved in the fighting on Japan were it not for the dropping of the atomic bombs. The dropping of these weapons stopped the war. In doing so they saved hundreds of thousands of lives, many of them Japanese. They wanted a war, they got a war. Someone, somehow, had to end it. This was probably the best way in terms of casualties, from either Nation.

    A tribute? Why not? I have the utmost respect for the men of Bomber Command who bombed German cities including Hamburg and Dresden. It would be hypocritical of me not to have the same respect for the men of all Allied Air Forces who contributed to eventual victory. If I have one criticism over the use of the atomic bomb, then it is that they were not ready for use much earlier, thereby alleviating immense suffering both in Europe and the Pacific.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: God Bless Steve Young. #1359626
    kev35
    Participant

    I’ve been thinking about how I feel now we’ve said our formal goodbyes to Steve.

    You know, I’m happy. I’m not happy that he’s gone, but look at the legacy he has left behind. We sat in that Chapel yesterday (were there any spare seats?) and heard and shared stories about our friend. About his penchant for collecting road transport memorabilia, his love of aviation, which we all share, and so many other things. We shared laughter and shed some tears. The formal goodbye was very hard but what followed was wonderful.

    Merlin 70’s photo shows it all. I commented to Andrew O as we walked onto the field that it seemed to be such a bizarre thing to be doing at a funeral, but it also felt right. Steve loved the air, it was fitting to spend some time craning our necks skywards. And we met new people, renewed friendships and some were made stronger, all because of Steve. We have so many good memories of Steve to look back on and his presence in our lives will not be diminished with his passing. How many people can you say that about in a lifetime? We cherish the time we spent with him, and we cherish the memory of the man who had so many facets. We are all extremely lucky to have known him or known of him.

    I spent some time speaking to Steve’s Mom. She was overwhelmed by the regard and affection in which Steve was held. She asked me to thank everyone for their kind thoughts and messages, to thank those who attended, those who couldn’t and those who perhaps just stopped for a few moments at 1:30 yesterday to remember the man we are all immensely proud to call friend.

    My world is no darker for Steve’s passing, his light burned too brightly to be extinguished by death. In fact it is all the richer for having known him. Where is he now? He’s with us all, always. He’ll be with Haydn as he goes to sleep and there when he wakes. He’ll brighten our dark days when we think of one of his jokes, he’ll inspire us in our research when we think we’ve reached the proverbial dead end. He’ll fly with Steve Patterson at Reno (thank you Steve) and wherever there’s an airshow he’ll be there, walking with us, keeping an eye on us.

    We’ll miss him, but when we want to speak to him, he will always be there, in our hearts.

    So, it can never be goodbye, because for me, he hasn’t really gone.

    See you around Steve.

    kev35

    in reply to: Steve Young – The coat thread #1942893
    kev35
    Participant

    Ben.

    Maybe it’s a part of the British psyche? The way we react to adversity.

    Or maybe it’s just because for those of us that knew him, this was Steve. I cannot remember ever meeting him without the hugest of grins on his face. “Hello mate, how you doing?” It wouldn’t be long then before, wherever we were, something would set him off and out would come the humour. It’s impossible not to remember him in this way. He was kind, he was considerate, he had a huge passion for the history of aviation, and he was funny.

    I’m sorry you think it’s inappropriate. Like all who knew Steve, our lives are much the poorer for his passing. But I don’t want to remember him with sadness, I want to remember the man who brought true friendship to our lives, and to remember him as I personally knew him, a happy, funny guy who lived life to the full. I have, and will, shed tears for Steve. I’m pretty sure he’d like them to be tears of happiness, not sadness or regret.

    Regards,

    kev35

Viewing 15 posts - 5,041 through 5,055 (of 8,395 total)