dark light

kev35

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,341 through 8,355 (of 8,395 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BAD NEWS #2003848
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: BAD NEWS

    Bad news indeed.

    I, too, hope he is soon free and making a welcome reappearance on this forum.

    If there is no military activity at Delhi?, it baffles me how authorities cannot understand the pleasure of watching aircraft, whether you just like to watch them or whether you are a number cruncher.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: A bit of Technical Education. #2111830
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: A bit of Technical Education.

    Not a bad idea. I know there are huge gaps in my knowledge, (particularly on technical issues). I understand the theory of flight but from there on a lot of it’s just guesswork (not all of it educated apparently).

    You’ve probably noticed i’m more interested in the history and also in the people who flew the aircraft we love to talk about today. Someone once said a little knowledge is a dangerous thing so If you’re willing to help, please feel free to educate me.

    Thanks

    kev35

    in reply to: Boeing 307 Airlner Crashes in Seattle Bay #2111835
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: Boeing 307 Airlner Crashes in Seattle Bay

    Roger, I was always of the opinion that aircraft were meant to fly and in the air is where they should be seen. However, I’m beginning to think you may be right. Where there is only one example of a type anywhere in the world, perhaps it would be madness to risk losing it in a crash. Imagine we had only one Spitfire, Lancaster, Hurricane or Mustang and we were to have them totally destroyed in accidents it would be a tragedy. Some one on the forum once said that we are only ‘Guardians’ of historic aircraft for future generations, perhaps they are right. Seeing the worlds last remaining Spitfire, or whatever type you choose, on static display is infinitely better than never seeing one at all.

    Regards’

    kev35

    in reply to: MID EAST :PEACE IS THE SOLUTION. #2003869
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: MID EAST :PEACE IS THE SOLUTION.

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 29-03-02 AT 04:59 PM (GMT)]Flanker 112 has a point. Rational people would find it impossible to condone the murder of innocent civilians, but when the perpetrators, acting as individuals are prepared to die in an attack I can’t see how it can be stopped, especially when suicide bombers come from both genders and various ages.

    As a Brit, I cannot condone any of the paramilitary groups operating in Ireland, but to an extent I can understand them. With part of the population wanting a united Ireland and others wanting to remain with the Crown it is difficult to see how it can end in compromise. One half of the population may have an intense hatred of an ‘occupying army’ the other sees them as peace keepers. These problems stretch much further back in history than the ‘recent troubles’, somehow a political solution acceptable to all must be found. Perhaps the first step should be the decommissioning of weapons by ALL paramilitary groups. Flanker implies that ‘at least the IRA give warnings to the British Police when a bomb is about to explode’. History shows this not always to be true (the assassinations of Airey Neave and Lord Mountbatten, the bombing of Warrington) and when given are not always accurate. By the same token I think over the years the British Army have not been entirely blameless, nor have successive Governments.

    Regarding the problems between Israel and the Palestinian people I fear Glenn is right. Both peoples have the right to exist but it seems unlikely they will ever be able to co-exist, so where the answer, or should I say acceptable answer, lies is a question proving ever more difficult to answer.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: What's your favourite Tri-jet? #680748
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: What’s your favourite Tri-jet?

    Does anyone have any idea how many aircraft each of the DC10/MD11 series and Tristar were built? It would also be interesting to know how many of each are still in service. If anyone has just too much time on their hands, perhaps they could come up with a formula comparing performance and factors like numbers built, how many are still in use, number of take off and landing cycles, miles flown, safety record etc. Difficult, I know, but it would give an idea which aircraft was more successful in whatever category.

    Regards

    kev35

    in reply to: Happy Easter #2003953
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: Happy Easter

    Rabie,
    How considerate of you to think of an old fool like me, My heart is gladdened by your concern.

    I was joking. I’ve gotten used to not having chocolate, of course, the drugs help tremendously!

    I hope you all stuff yourselves silly with chocol…that stuff. And feel free to enjoy my share.

    And Rabie, while I’ve got your attention could you do me a favour? I know you’re a legend at digging out info and pics, I’d really appreciate it if you could see what you could find out about aviation places of interest in your part of the country, Kent, as I may be down there in the summer. Particularly anything off the beaten track or a little bit out of the ordinary.

    Thanks

    kev

    in reply to: Happy Easter #2003958
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: Happy Easter

    Can we please stop talking about chocolate? Spare a thought for us poor diabetics for whom Easter is not chocolate Heaven but chocolate hell.I can’t bear any talk of chocolate cake, chocolate bars, chocolate mousse, chocolate eggs, chocol…..

    I thnk I’d better go and lie down in a darkened room.

    Happy Easter,

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: P-40 MTO operations #2111904
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: P-40 MTO operations

    Could it be China and Clare Chennaults Flying Tigers?

    Regards

    kev

    in reply to: P-40 MTO operations #2111927
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: P-40 MTO operations

    PII

    Feel free to post away. It’s an area I know little of and am always willing to learn.

    kev35

    in reply to: P-40 MTO operations #2111941
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: P-40 MTO operations

    I agree with Moggy, another good book but it does lack the edge of Piece of Cake. Much of it is about the long range desert group. Perhaps the reason for less relevance being placed on the air war is that it is an area which has been the subject of only limited research.

    An interesting addition to PII’s collection would be one of Neville Duke’s, the title of which I can’t remember but it focusses on the Desert Air Force with 112 Squadron and operations in Italy.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Airport pic of the day- 27/03/02 #680986
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: Airport pic of the day- 27/03/02

    It certainly looks like Elmdon. I spent many happy weekends there in the 1970’s. If I remember rightly, on the other side of the building is a spiral staircase with a platform from which you had a great view of the area in front of the hangars. Can someone please find a similar picture with a Dan-Air Comet in front of the terminal?

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2 #2111944
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2

    Moggy,

    I realised other units operated from there but didn’t know which so thanks for that, another one of the million gaps in my knowledge has been filled. Do you know whether any Coastal Command units operated from there?

    Also, do you know how I can find out why 83 Squadron were there for a short time without resorting to the ORB?

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2 #2112024
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: RAF Lossiemouth in WW2

    Hi,

    Hope this is helpful.

    21 Squadron 24-6-40 to 29-10-40
    27-5-41 to 4-6-41
    7-9-41 to 20-9-41
    Aircraft were Bristol Blenheim IV.

    57 Squadron 24-6-40 to 13-8-40
    Aircraft were Bristol Blenheim IV.

    63 Squadron 6-12-42 to 31-12-42
    Aircraft were Mustang 1, 1A.

    82 Squadron 18-4-41 to 2-5-41
    Aircraft were Bristol Blenheim IV.

    83 Squadron 21-2-40 to 19-3-40
    Aircraft were H.P. Hampden 1.

    110 Squadron 19-4-40 to 2-5-40
    23-12-41 to 28-12-41
    Aircraft were Bristol Blenheim IV.

    82, 83 and 110 Squadrons were detached flights operating from Lossiemouth for a short period. I think all the Blenheim Squadrons were night fighter units and I think 83 Squadron with its Hampdens was probably operating from Lossiemouth for an operation in Norway or was engaged in mine-laying.

    Is your Grandfather still alive? If so, he may be able to fill in the gaps. If not, you may be able to trace his service record through the PRO at Kew. I think the RAFA has a website for ‘old comrades’ where you may be able to find someone who served with your Grandfather.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Squadron Codes #2112027
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: Squadron Codes

    I seem to remember seeing somewhere that some squadron codes were changed during the early years of the war in an attempt to confuse the Germans in to thinking that the RAF was stronger than it actually was.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: What's your favourite Tri-jet? #681394
    kev35
    Participant

    RE: What’s your favourite Tri-jet?

    Probably the Trident. (Giving my age away here.)
    The L-1011 does have classic lines with the faired in tail and third engine, not altogether dissimilar to the 727. I think the DC10, MD11 series would probably have given the Tristar a competitive run for its money had it not suffered the cargo door problems and the Turkish Airlines crash at the forest of Ermenonville near Paris.

    Regards,

    kev35

Viewing 15 posts - 8,341 through 8,355 (of 8,395 total)