Maybe the American carrier was launching – not recovering at the time? Or was in fog too? (just speculating)
But the really sensible thing was to go to the planned alternate – as they did.
On 16’th July 0830
— look up from your queue —
and give me a royal wave (not the two finger variant!)
Yesterday I got no. 45 (of 46) seats on ATR OY-JRY of Danish Air Transport. Copenhagen – Esbjerg – Fairford. (tour arranged by http://www.pilots.dk). Return flight same evening.
See You!
(Now back to http://www.airshow2005.dk)
Perhaps this post just shows my ignorance, but what are the differences between this system and the system Sweden uses (Ugglan)? From the same manufacturer, if I’m not mistaken.
Same model, or large differences?
Regards
No difference! Also some crashes here – though they didn’t fly much. The most hilarious statement on the cancellation day from CHOD Denmark: “UAV’s are the future!” Apparantly not this one! 😀
Hmm. Is that the best thing they could do about it – use it as a reconnaissance pod on MU-2’s? Very clever UAV system I must say. 😮
The MU-2 “recce” aircraft is a little more clever, than it looks. The idea is to fly around outside restricted areas but guided by the ground operators. With a “real” pilot in the air the authorities don’t get nearly as nervous about the “UAV”. 😉
Here is a neat Swedish? idea: Flying the UAV on a manned aircraft!
It was to the tune of 425 mio kroner (no Euro here 😉 )
The IHAWK-system was scratched last year – just after a lengthy up-date.(So no GBAD left)
The Navy lost their submarines. (We tell them, it is because they were not visible enough 😀 )
But we will vote – even if everybody else has said “Non, nee, no etc.”
Is/was Kjeller connected with the RNoAF Air Material Command? Or am I mixing things up?
Best regards
The great thing about “Empire of the Sun” is the boy’s absolute devotion to “aviation”! I certainly see a lot of myself in him. “P-51’s! Cadillacs of the Sky!” 😉
Vulcan rate of climb
From PPRUNE, “military aircrew”, “Did you fly the Vulcan?”:
“Here’s one from the memory banks. Back in 1965 we did the delivery air test on, I think, XM655. The air test schedule required a combat power take-off and climb to maximum altitude. We had to take engine Ts and Ps every minute. Later the Vulcan was restricted to cruise power but we had about 104% on two engines and 102% on the other two. For some reason the maximum power was never uniform across all 4 engines.
Brakes off we accelerated down the runway. We had about 50% fuel so our AUW was about 137,000lbs. That was when the Mark 2 weighed in at about 97 or 98k. One minute later, passing 2,000 feet we read out all the figures to the AEO. After 2 minutes, passing 7k we started again. He had no sooner finished one set when we started on the next. We continued like a love-sick angel at 5,000 fpm. Passing 50,000 we were still climbing like a rocket just over 9 minutes after take-off.
Our ROC started to reduce but still over 2,000 fpm. Passing 55,000 we wondered just how high it would go. We had the full pressure gear on, g-pants and pressure jerkins, P or Q masks, but it was really into unknown territory. At 55,500 our ROC was approaching 500 fpm and we were passing Glasgow. We decided to call it a day and turned for home.”
(“Pontius Navigator”)
A very long thread, but fascinating: There is also a pilot, “BEAgle”, who seems to remember all speeds etc. from long ago. But you have some searching to do.
Best regards
10 members of the “Mosquito Aircrew Association” attended ceremonies yesterday. One of the actual aircrew taking part still survives in Australia. The man holding the Danish flag is a former member of the Danish Resistance. The armband was only worn 5’th May 1945 – or later, of course.
(Picture: Scanpix)
There were cameracrews flying with the raid and the footage has been used in an old documentary in Danish TV. The low flying is – well – to be seen! Crossing the North Sea an oily film of salt build on the windscreen of Embry’s Mosquito. He cleared some of it, but was deeply dependent on navigator Peter Clapham calling out obstructions. (Powerlines etc.) The general altitude was “below treetop”.
Alan125. I’ll dig out some much more knowledgeable than me, concerning Danish history in, or around, WWII.
Best regards
Basil Embry led the attack and had a book published in 1957: “Mission Completed”. A very brave man indeed!
My father was a blacksmith apprentice 40 miles west of Copenhagen at the time and noticed a Mustang going west after the attack (by the very different sound from the “normal” Bf 109’s).
Nice, anyone remember the Video shot’s of that Mad Yank Airforce pilot that liked to fly a B-52 in ground affect over and past his buddie’s having a picnic 😮 .(they took the shot’s :rolleyes: )
Last time he ever did it was across an airfield and crashed killing all on board 🙁 , Don’t remember now which base :confused: , was quiet some year’s back on the tele new’s.
Cheer’s all 😀 , Tally :dev2: Ho! :dev2: Ho! Phil :diablo: .(Now I must really go before I colapse off this seat, having M.S. is a real B*tch 😮 )
Must have been “Bud” Holland. There is a very interesting professional study into the whole story of “Bud” breaking rules for a number of years:
Darker Shades of Blue:
A Case Study of Failed Leadership
By
Major Tony Kern
United States Air Force
http://s92270093.onlinehome.us/crmdevel/resources/paper/darkblue/darkblue.htm
”On the 24th of June 1994, Czar 52, a B-52H assigned to the 325th Bomb Squadron, 92d Bomb Wing, Fairchild Air Force Base, WA, launched at approximate 1358 hours Pacific Daylight Time (PDT), to practice maneuvers for an upcoming airshow. ….
……At mid-field, Czar 52 began a tight 360 degree left turn around the control tower at only 250 feet altitude above ground level (AGL). Approximately three quarters of the way through the turn, the aircraft banked past 90 degrees, stalled, clipped a power line with the left wing and crashed. Impact occurred at approximately 1416 hours PDT. There were no survivors out of a crew of four field grade officers.”
Yes, why did “they” throw away that perfect logo, the viking ship. Just to look like everybody else. We came in peace (sometimes) – all 3 Nordic countries.
Here’s one
(should’ve been in the commercial forum) 😮
When McDonnell-Douglas/Boeing? checked the design of the MD85/B-717, they put the computers into finding a better wing. In the end they couldn’t come up with a better shape/airfoil than the original DC-9 wing, made by human engineers and slide rules.
(Good story! Is it true?)
Told to me by a pretty reliable DC-9/MD80 pilot.
pic: http://karsten.thiee.free.fr/37/SAS%20DC-9.jpg