dark light

Scar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 615 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2140052
    Scar
    Participant

    They’re “completing” trials for the last 4 or 5 years, IIRC, and every single year our officials are promising that “S-350 Vityaz will be fielded this or the next year”. Just like the 40N6 missile for S-400 which is “completing” these trials since 2009, when Ashurbeily(ex-head of A-A) had declared this for the first time.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2140153
    Scar
    Participant

    First time i saw 9M96 mockup at MAKS’1999. And even then it was already under development for at least of two or three years. AFAIK, the problem was described as “the missile is “refusing” to hit its targets” – in other words, there is a problem with its flight-control or/and homing system.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2140167
    Scar
    Participant

    9M96 was intended to become a common missile family for S-300PM(U)2, S-400 and later for Redut, Poliment-Redut and S-350. But it didn’t, yet. That’s why i called it a semi-paper project.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2140697
    Scar
    Participant

    Actually, even before Gorshkov, it failed for many times on 20380 corvettes. Unfortunately, 9M96 is still a semi-paper-project with a doubtful reliability.

    in reply to: JF-17 vs J-10 vs LCA #2142856
    Scar
    Participant

    @Deino

    Because numerology rocks! :stupid:

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2143593
    Scar
    Participant

    Scar, maybe you can answer this for me, but what about Mikran making GaN modules for Kret? Apparently they are working on it:

    Dunno, what really should i say? “Show me a single working GaN AESA serial produced radar”? They’re declaring: “our company is currently developing the GaN MIC technology.”. Ok, nice, but this is what i was talking about earlier – developing or working on something isn’t equal to have something real and serial produced. Again, look at AESA Zhuk.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2143682
    Scar
    Participant

    Where and who said they built GaN modules? I’ve read only about some abstract expirements with “GaN transistors and amplifiers”.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2143691
    Scar
    Participant

    Scar, care to share any sources? From what I recall, they tested GaN modules a few years ago. Why 7 years away?

    Tests and experiments =/= serial production. For example, Fazotron has tested its first Zhuk-A prototype ten years ago, in 2007, but still struggle to establish its serial production and make it through the State Trials. Read this interview with Yuri Beliy in National Defence: http://www.oborona.ru/includes/periodics/authors/2016/0922/185919375/detail.shtml

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2143758
    Scar
    Participant

    I have yet to see any end product that uses Ga/N module or even advertised for it.

    In Russia, we’re at least 7 years away from GaN AESA serial production. US was the first who fielded AESA-radars based on the GaN transceivers.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2144040
    Scar
    Participant

    Sad news.( My condolences to the pilot’s family.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2144133
    Scar
    Participant

    Better than Klyon, but i hope later bunchs of SM3 will be equipped with a T/220 targeting pod.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2144447
    Scar
    Participant

    @Austin

    Incredibly honest and objective review. My respect to Pukhov.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2144601
    Scar
    Participant

    For me it’s a disaster, but you – may think whatever you want. TBH, i don’t care.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2145084
    Scar
    Participant

    Yeas, it’s a *******ing disaster when attack heli accidently shooting its weapons on the parking full of people. If someone would have died, it would be a tragedy.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2145263
    Scar
    Participant

    Video recorded by guncam of the helo. Looks like it really was an FCS failure – rockets were launched right in that moment when the Master has been turned on.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 615 total)