Page 40 – Key Publishing

Scar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 615 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 →

Author

Posts
March 6, 2016 at 3:46 pm in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2190598

Scar
Participant

are those kh-29 t?

if so, how does he aim them ? shouldnt he watch the display until impact ?

Kh-29T is a fire and forget missile + MIG-27 are equipped with Kaira targeting system which includes display in the cockpit.

March 6, 2016 at 3:01 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2190613

Scar
Participant

(hint hint, it wasnt Davidenko)

Correct.

March 6, 2016 at 11:59 am in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2190699

Scar
Participant

Alexander Davidenko

When, where and what exactly he said? What parameters? Maximum speed?!

March 6, 2016 at 9:27 am in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2190723

Scar
Participant

I am sure they settlet for a compromised design back in 2004.
But didn’t the PakFa program officially start back in 2002?
How much could they know about the T_50 performance this point.

Who are “they”? As Mikhailov said, speed requirement has been reduced from 2.15 Mach to 2 Mach because this 0.15 dosen’t make any significant difference but makes plane more expensive and heavy due to materials and design solutions that would be required to achieve these 2.15 Mach.

Also I seem to remember the PakFa Chief designer say in a pro advs video that the T_50 has even surpased several key requirement points?

What parameters, exactly? Name of that “Chief designer”?

March 5, 2016 at 12:26 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2190983

Scar
Participant

Ergo, there is no testing data for max. speed relaesed……..? Say nothing of degressive speed!

I repeat, that was a statement of the head of RuAF. Believe it or not.

March 4, 2016 at 8:25 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2191081

Scar
Participant

Scandalous? Hardly. This is the sort of compromise that often makes advanced engineering projects practical and/or affordable.

Yes, scandalous. There was much butthurt and holy wars in the aviational Runet.

March 4, 2016 at 8:46 am in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2191300

Scar
Participant

May I require the source of the degressive speed for PAK-FA?

12 years ago, there was pretty scandalous and famous statement of that time’s RuAF commander Mikhalov.

Москва. 8 декабря, 2004 г. ИНТЕРФАКС-АВН – Тактико-технические характеристики (ТТХ) перспективного авиационного комплекса фронтовой авиации (ПАК ФА), который создается компанией “Сухой”, продолжают корректироваться, сообщил “Интерфаксу-АВН” главнокомандующий ВВС генерал армии Владимир Михайлов.
“Мною принято решение несколько уменьшить скоростные параметры, заложенный в тактико-техническое задание (ТТЗ) ПАК ФА”, – сказал главком.
По его словам, предложенная корректировка “не только не снизит боевой потенциал самолета, но и позволит избежать многих конструктивных сложностей, которые неизбежно возникнут, если параметры скорости реализовать в соответствии с первоначальным ТТЗ”.
“Новое значение числа М (М – число Маха, равное скорости звука. – “ИФ-АВН”) более чем достаточно для решения тех задач, которые будут возложены на самолет 5-го поколения”, – отметил В.Михайлов.
http://govorim-vsem.ru/viewtopic.php?t=11779

March 4, 2016 at 12:40 am in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2191393

Scar
Participant

Question: What is so wrong with the Russian military-industrial complex that it has continued to very obviously fail to produce a simple UCAV according to the Predator/Reaper model

Nothing. We just never tried.

March 3, 2016 at 9:55 am in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2191749

Scar
Participant

Former Sukhoi test pilot Anatoly Kvochur in the front seat – looking a bit old now.

Ken

Not Sukhoi but MIG and Gromov LII.

March 1, 2016 at 9:21 am in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2193268

Scar
Participant

Ok.
Su-25
Inside Syria?

No

February 26, 2016 at 1:21 pm in reply to: 6 generation fighter #2194687

Scar
Participant

Today Aviation Week newsletter brought me this. Opinion: Defining The Next Fighter

February 25, 2016 at 10:00 am in reply to: Russian UCAV's in Syria? #2195210

Scar
Participant

IMO, the main problem for us is not the UCAV itself, but the absence of the proper lightweight missiles with a high off-boresight capability. Our traditional ATGMs simply aren’t suited for that.

February 24, 2016 at 4:35 pm in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2195498

Scar
Participant

Off topic, but it’s no wonder Su-47 never bore fruit with it’s tiny internal compartment.

Actually, this compartment was installed on S-37 when it has been refitted to be used as a flying-lab for PAK FA program.

Here is a photo of original S-37.

February 24, 2016 at 3:48 pm in reply to: Military Aviation News #2195514

Scar
Participant

It is hard to imagine from a political perspective and likely to be one of if not the least impressive aircraft from a kinematic perspective.

Why?

February 24, 2016 at 3:06 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2195518

Scar
Participant

f-16.net is the nest of the most ignorant and arrogant US/West ‘hooray-patriots'(i.e. fanboys) – a marvelous home for myriads of misconceptions and misinformation.
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 615 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 →