LMAO on the Freedom of Press. Daily Mail has deleted its article saying: U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’
Free Press my a$$, damn hypocrites.
Let’s play a little game here Scar:
Evidence or GTFO. That’s the only game i would like to play with the people who constantly spreading obviously false info about sarin and chemical munitions.
All you did was show that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Another one baseless statemen with no evidence.
Why do they use binary shells? What is the issue with unitary nerve gas shells or bombs?
Better ask your Snackbar ‘allies’ – why they’re using unitary chemical munitions? Which are not so safe but much-much simplier in production and were produced by all countries before 1970’s.
Where is the evidence that unitary nerve gas canisters/or munitions have been used in this conflict (because they have not, and aren’t FOR A GOOD REASON!)
First you provide any evidence that Assad shot his own leg, obviously in the favor of your ‘allies’.
Your grasping at straws in an attempt to see what you don’t want to. Debunked…. please.
Evidence, *****, i need evidence.
First of all, vapor is way different to aerosol.
And?!…It can be EASILY converted to both states.
artillery shells or air ammunitions (yes, specifically designed). Bomb accidently falling on a depot? Funny. MR i know better, do you stock sarin per se? or as a bi-component?
I already debunked this obvious bull**** about “only bi-component munitions”.
No need to write such a miserable excuses with zero evidence, based on the obviously false statements and misinformation.
No. It needs a lot of heat to boil AND a dissemination reagent.
Yes.
Зарин легко переводится в парообразное состояние или аэрозоль и в таком виде пригоден для нанесения ингаляционных поражений, так как обладает довольно незначительной по вели¬чине летальной дозой (75 мг.мин/м3). Дозы такого уровня не составляет труда создавать на площади цели с помощью артиллерийских и авиационных боеприпасов
=
Zarin is easily converted to a vapor state or aerosol and in this form is suitable for applying inhalation lesions, since it has a rather insignificant lethal dose (75 mg.min / m3). Doses of this level can easily be created on the target area with the help of artillery and air ammunition
Assad’s forces attacked and killed 70 people in a town with Sarin, deal with it.
Deal with what? With your false info about toxic gases and chemical munitions? Or with your inability to prove me wrong when i’m saying that this situation is obviously plays in the favor of your Snackbar ‘allies’, and completely not in the favor of Assad?
The only thing you proved is the extent of mental gymnastics one needs to stretch the actual event into the narrative being spoon fed to the weak minded who swallow Sputnik headlines like “Nerve gas attack, who benefits?” as if the conflict in Syria is being fought by rational parties observing the Geneva convention.
Since when obvious facts and logic became a “mental gymnastics”?!
Had you read anything about how nerve agents are used, you would not be repeating this line about Syria bombing a depot.
I already proved, with facts and schemes of chemical munitions that i know about this much more than you. While you’re spreading obviously false information and have zero evidence and even basic logic.
And the most funny thing is that earlier you said:
the issues with Sarin is that exposing it to fire (like an explosion) breaks it down.
While your officials said:
“There were measures put in place to avoid hitting what we believe is a storage of sarin gas, so that that would not be ignited and cause a hazard to civilians or anyone else,”
Now, please, help me to decide who’s lying – you or your officials? Or both of you – just on different things?
Oh no, not this bull**** again. I proved, with facts, that you’re basing on the obviously false info about sarin and chemical munitions in general. As well as two days ago i said that Assad is obviously THE LAST man on Earth who may get something good from this chemical attack. Time proved i was right – the only “good” for Assad was a strike by 59 TLAM’s on his airbase. While Jihadi-boys are obviously celebrating this strike.
Deal with it.
Ok, I suppose that’s why in weaponized Sarin shells the precursors are separated in the casing. When fired they mix in flight to activate the gas. In other words, read whatever the housewives are reading. They seem to know more than you.
Another one bull****. NOT all munitions have components separated. And especially homemade ones. Only in 1970’s there were invented so-called “binary” munitions where components are separated. And still NOT all chemical munitions are BINARY munitions. NOT AT ALL.
Not to mention, one of the issues with Sarin is that exposing it to fire (like an explosion) breaks it down. Look at how Sarin is stored in an artillery shell, small containers to be dispersed by the small explosive charge.
You have the evidence there was only fire, without shockwave from the HE-bombs which were hitting that storage??? Please, stop – your assumptions are nothing more than poor excuses based on the obvoius bull****, misconceptions and baseless speculations. Just stop.
Sarin cannot be released like that, if you bomb it, you destroy it.
Pure bull**** for ignorant village idiots. Sarin, as many other poison gases, very easily change its state into a vapor or aerosol which even more easily may be dispersed by the shockwave damaging and sending to flight the container it’s stored in. That’s why it was widely used in artillery and other munitions where the low-power HE-charge made it an aerosol and in the same time disperesed around the area of explosion.
And only housewives aren’t aware of these basic facts about sarin and chemical munitions in general.
Look at the map. Our AD assests are located 150km away from Shayrat airbase covered by Nusayriyah Mountains. There was no technical ability to shoot down anything at that range and given landscape. But even if we would have this ability, i’m not sure we would be willing to shoot down anything, anyway. Of course, TLAM is not a manned aircraft but technically it’s still US aircraft.
Obviously, the U.S. Infiltrated that airbase, stole a Syrian aircraft and loaded it with Sarin.
You have some evidence that sarin was onboard of SyAF aircrafts and not inside that bombed munitions factory and storage?!
That same aircraft that was tracked by radars taking off and flying over the area at the exact time of Sarin gas attack, the tracked by radar landing at airbase. All so Trump could order a strike against parts of that airbase rather than strike all Syrian air assets. Yes, very reasonable conclusion.
Or even more simple: you accidently hit the Snackbar’s storage full of chemical munitions/agents with you usual conventional bombs -> **** hit the fan.
Either he is mad, or or he does not have full control of his troops, I do not know which is the most likely….
And i don’t know how anyone reasonable can’t see it’s a blatant ‘False Flag’ which plays only in favor of those who support, train and arm Snackbar lunatics in Syria and obviously against Assad.
Iraqis already have MMW FCR, the Arbalet on the Mi-28NEs..
Arbalet is a FCR made by Fasotron NIIR of Ka-52. FCR for Mi-28N is N025 by GRPZ.
“Onyx”: 800 km – Myth or Reality?
http://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/158387.html
^^ What exactly is he trying to say ?
Bullsh!t IMO.
Don’t let politicians and main-stream Western media fool you. This “chemical attack” is an ideal, pure and blatant invitation for US/NATO invasion. And given this fact, Assad is the last man on Earth who may benefit from it. In this particular case, i tend to believe to the version of our MoD. TLDR: Syrian AF accidently hit the storage full of chemical agents.