Oh .. Who cares?
I mean this type of discussion had some merit a couple of years ago. Not so much now. The plane has been produced in sufficient numbers and people from all over the world are beginning to train on it.
Soon Air forces will begin receiving their “training” F-35s .. We will then know.
You can also bet your **s the Turks are going to take that baby out for a spin and try and intimidate Greeks and Syrians and Russians, as soon as they get their hands on it.
So in the next few months we will know if it is what people say it is.. it is pointless to argue like this so late in the show …
If an F-4 can look that good with an “aegean ghost” camo, imagine an Su-35 !
[ATTACH=CONFIG]244230[/ATTACH]
I know that plenty of you folks are digging it… So this is like, just my opinion, man. Over and out.
Personally, I don’t “digg it” .. I think all russian airplanes would -aesthetically- look 100x better with western style paint jobs.
I assume they have done enough trails on the bays that it doesn’t need any external structures. Su-47 had weapon spoilers already;
And T-50-3/-4 are in Akhtubinsk which is basically black hole of any pictures or information. I don’t think it is a new development per see, they have always been very selective when it comes to being open about information on T-50. Some areas are very open other very hush hush.
Weapon spoilers?
PAK-TA is a real project (it is loooooooong way off though) but that video or that design has absolutely nothing to do with the real thing. This is just some students design nothing more, not even worthy of a thread.
It may be worthy of a thread, I mean the guy did a good job!
So it has only one door then? Is the bay there on the existing prototypes? I can’t seem to spot the seams.
I find the dimensions quite astonishing frankly. Looks like a very tight fit after accounting for the ejection mechanism. Given that the wing isn’t very deep (so the bay doesn’t really eat into wing volume), is there any reason why it cannot be adopted as a bolt-on system for other fighters?
LOBL will be adequate, though it should ideally feature a data-link.
LOBL with the missile still in the bay?
Ejected, probably sideways.
Won’t the missile need to acquire target first?
Well if Russia and China are introducing T-50s and J-20/31s come 2020, then without the F-35, it’d be non-stealth vs stealth for much of the decade, with the exception of the F-22. I personally wouldn’t want to do Rafale vs T-50.
The point of my argument was credibility, not whether you ride to battle in a rafale or not.
Well yeah, 15 years is really the absolute minimum time you’d need to wait before an in-service date. Whatever the alternative, the project would basically have to start roughly where F/A-XX is now, meaning that instead of having a capability that some fringe characters dislike, you’d have either zero capability, or a grossly outdated capability for the next 15-20 years.
Zero capability? Well that comes in odds with all the chest beaters who swear by the capabilities of the western aircraft and how much superior they are to Russian made aircraft.
It also comes in odds to everyone who says Russian and Chinese industries are nowhere near good enough to produce viable VLO adversaries and in good numbers. Both of these have been expressed in various forms at various opportunities.
If the above are true what kind of zero capability you go on about? If the above are not true why should we believe anything else that comes from similar sources?
Oh yeah our 4th gen planes are much better than anything else out there
The other side is pretty much not capable of producing anything worthwhile in the VLO area
Oh and by the way WE ABSOLUTELY NEED -ALL OF US- to buy this new hyper expensive plane that will save us from the opponent’s planes that we could already beat anyway and the ones that the opponent doesn’t have the capability to build to a standard that we would consider a threat!
How does that logic sound when spelled out?
I’d say you need to revise your arguments because no side can have the pie and eat it too!
10 + meter is OK if you are using 500 kg or 1000 kg dumb bomb it will do its work for most cases , if you use 100 or 250 kg then that kind of CEP may not do it works
Guys… have you ever seen what 100kg of explosives do? Everything within 10 meters will be dead and torn to pieces!
Yes, the F-35 is fat and slow and nothing you have shown here has indicated otherwise. The max speed of M1.6 (or 1.67 if you wish) alone is nothing stellar, the acceleration to that speed is painful, the range at that speed is almost zero.. What is it good for, then?
It brings unprecedented SA for the pilot and VLO characteristics to increase survivability and lethality supposedly.
However the point I was trying to make was that all the above is true only if the F-35 goes up against non-VLO targets. Every advantage this plane supposedly has evaporates when it is facing VLO adversaries / assets.
Something that LM I guess didn’t count on other countries acquiring for a very long time. It seems that is not going to be true.
Who’s to say that Boeing would have not run into similar problems? How’s that 787, KC-46, etc coming along?
Remember too that the government has even said that about 40% of the overruns were their fault.
IMHO the economic downturn played a huge part in the delays too.
I would say that if the same approach was to be followed, that would have been pretty much the same.
I think the navy and Air Force versions should have been a different plane.
No, it was the USG that set the requirements and LM offered up a proposal to meet those requirements.
Note that the X-32 costs were similar to the X-35 bid.
But also the latter ones ballooned out of proportion. After what point do we stop putting delays and cost overruns up to normal development cycles?
My personal opinion is that the JSF experiment should have been declared a failure several cost revisions ago and another design should have been put forward.
You do know that a VAST majority of the F-35 is NOT made by Lockheed, right?
Or do you think that because they are the Prime that somehow items like the avionics (only EOTS is made by them), then engine (P&W), etc are magically more expensive?
No of course not, but they are made FOR the F-35 a design that inherently pushed costs up. I believe you can admit that a different design could have been cheaper.
You cannot build a fighter with the capabilities & mfg standards of the F-35 any cheaper than the F-35, especially when you throw in the new SDD costs.
Why are you so sure about that?