New Robotic Russian T-50 Fighter Jet Fit for Star Wars
Russia’s new fifth-generation T-50 fighter jet, currently in the testing phase, incorporates elements of automation which make it more like a robot than a fighter plane, explains a representative from the Rostech corporation.Read more: http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150525/1022530075.html#ixzz3b9W5Zotg
So there is insistence to the 0.1-1sqm values? That isn’t so good news I think.
Nice side by side of the two main attack types being procured.
It just occurred to me. Is there a reason for the vertical separation of the twin rotors on the Ka-52? Why isn’t it shorter?
Is that a T-50 model on deck with wings folded at the root? (!)
Great shot of the new Yak-130 aerobatic team in front of the Moscow Business Center.
A clean Hellduck.
At least I, cannot see your images (I assume you posted)
No…. still can’t find it…..
I’ve read the last 9 posts again and again………. but I still can’t find any ‘PAK FA News, Pics and Debate’ content.
What am I missing ???
I’ve heard of ‘Thread Creep’ and I know the PAK FA news is a bit thin on the ground, but this is ridiculous…
Meanwhile…. just to show willing….here’s my scratch-built 1/72 scale model of the T50……
… and a Russian resin kit of same…..
Ken
Scratch built? Really?
I have a tonne of questions. Like what material do you use? where do you buy it from? etc etc…
please do tell us…
During this somewhat prolonged interlude, let me introduce you to another ‘Hot Russian’:
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/new-tehnik-parad-150504/
Kudos to Uralvagonzavod!
Quite underwhelmed about it actually. The auto turret was supposed to give the tank a really low profile but this is actually as tall-if not taller- as the LeoA6 …
What a pretty Ka-52 photo:
I still like the single seater better… it was the bomb!! 😀
The current capability of the missile shield is not the point, but the plans the deploy it is.
for once we agree!
“like a cheap MALD” :rolleyes:
I guess it all comes down to how expensive is it going to be to maintain the aircraft in question to a flyable and mission usable state + installation of required remote control modules (which in this case would include remote sensor control as well) for a projected number of missions.
Even if the aircraft are at the limits of their operational lives, they can still be used for bomb trucks/ launch platforms if not for A2A role (which is inherently difficult to do anyway as the situational awareness of a remotely piloted A2A plane would be very limited at best.
What do you think?
-Dazza
Actually there is a lot of merit to this idea and it has been considered extensively at times. You shouldn’t dismiss it outright as such.
4 prototypes this year??. 7 and a bit months left in the year, will be interesting if they can do their stated schedule. We all wait in anticipation
Photos seem to have dried out. This gives me hope that some serious testing is going on. Hopefully the project is on schedule and the important aspects of the aircraft.
yes, if target get out of fov at intercept point there is no missile agile enough to rectify
With that in mind, perhaps it is more beneficial to increase powered flight time.
FD, actually NO US 5G prototypes exhibited Luneberg lenses, and which only appeared on the F-35 in the last couple of years (ask Spudman).
I have to admit my memory may not serve me on this one exactly. I can’t swear I remember prototypes or serial production aircraft, so you may very well be right!
Or simply it has not been flying with its RAM, and hence can be tracked just fine.
Not that anyone would have difficulty tracking a nearby F-22 doing all sorts of maneuvers. Reality is pretty different from a couple cherry picked RCS angles.
So we are coming back to the beginning. If the plane is that far into development and hasn’t got its VLO suit on yet (whilst others have had) that may hint to a problem with the programme. No?
I am not referring to RAM. Exactly the opposite.
VLO planes employ a special device for safety and to keep their signature classified.