dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sad RAF Museum #918245
    Mike J
    Participant

    Think the car park franchise is NCP, (or similar) as such nothing to do with RAFM. I dont expect the museum see’s a penny of the income.

    Why on earth would they institute a parking charge, then give it all away?

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #919187
    Mike J
    Participant

    They are not owned by the USAF. They are owned by the National Museum of the USAF.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #919238
    Mike J
    Participant

    There is also a two-seater currently being built up at Ione with an R-2800

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #920914
    Mike J
    Participant

    Incidentally, it is marked as WH589 but has nothing in common with the Haydon-Baillie machine (which is now partly flying as ‘Furias’).

    Furias is not currently flying, it languishes in the back of a hangar after a series of mishaps at Reno a few years back (a gear collapse on landing followed by being dropped whilst being recovered), with the owner having reportedly given up on the project.

    in reply to: Duxford- 'The Naughty Field' #922475
    Mike J
    Participant

    Mike J I don’t think I said you suggested that, I was looking for where these “extra” costs would be and repeat I am sure you are right but without any real justification on the police’s part. Where do you think the extra police cost lie?

    The policing cost for the aftermath of the Shoreham accident, not to mention their subsequent investigation, is enormous. The perceived risk for airshows has gone up as a result. I understand that the expectation amongst airshow organisers is that the cost that they are quoted for policing future airshows will rise, as a direct result of this.

    Bomberboy I hope you are not suggesting that the Waddington airshow will not return next year with a shiny new runway, it is still on my bucket list.

    The RAF have already announced that there will be no more airshows at Waddington.

    in reply to: The Vulcan XH558 the final flight, its happened. #922619
    Mike J
    Participant

    I see that at least one of the photographers who was on-site for the final flight is already cashing in by flogging prints of the last landing on ebay and advertising them for free all over Facebook.

    in reply to: Duxford- 'The Naughty Field' #923108
    Mike J
    Participant

    I hear what you say Mike but as others have said the police cannot clear the naughty field at DX or stop people standing anywhere they choose. Nor can the traffic be stopped.

    Eh? Show me anything in my posts which suggested this idea. My point is very simple, policing costs for airshows will increase as a result of Shoreham. This will add to the burden on airshow organisers, along with the inevitable hike in insurance premiums for both operators and event organisers.

    in reply to: Duxford- 'The Naughty Field' #923301
    Mike J
    Participant

    Not the point I was making. The charge for policing a major event such as an airshow is made to the event organisers, not to those unfortunates directly involved in any incident. The concern amongst airshow organisers, I understand, is that these charges will see a substantial hike next year due to an increased perceived risk in the aftermath of Shoreham.

    in reply to: Duxford- 'The Naughty Field' #844821
    Mike J
    Participant

    Adrian is right, the insurance companies will be paying out millions over Shoreham and despite the fact they have been collecting premiums for many years to cover such an eventuality they will have already taken that in profit and they will now want to recover this loss rapidly by increasing premiums and maintain their investors dividends.

    I understand that the costs to the local police in the aftermath of Shoreham were also enormous, so in the same vein I would expect the policing chages for airshows to increase substantially in future. None of this is good news for airshows. 🙁

    in reply to: Vulcan Last Flight? #845209
    Mike J
    Participant

    It would be nice to see some of it now channelled into some of the other worthy airworthy causes, though I cannot see that happening.

    Watch this space…

    in reply to: Vulcan Last Flight? #845508
    Mike J
    Participant

    Apparently the CAA are investigating allegations that the Vulcan was rolled on a recent flight

    http://m.granthamjournal.co.uk/news/local/did-vulcan-do-banned-trick-over-grantham-1-7033833

    in reply to: Vulcan Last Flight? #845529
    Mike J
    Participant

    The whole thing is becoming quite surreal.

    However, I eagerly await WH904’s upcoming incoherent but entertaining rant on the subject to brighten up my day. 🙂

    Mike J
    Participant

    I still find it hard to get beyond the reason for the harness being cut, which to my mind remains inconsistent with the idea of him surviving the forced landing unscathed and walking away.

    in reply to: Vulcan Last Flight? #846561
    Mike J
    Participant

    I don’t understand this ‘long-term educational commitment’ thing in relation to the HLF funding. Surely when the grant was made it was with the declared plan that the aircraft would be parked at Duxford on retirement?

    in reply to: Albatros crash in NZ #847091
    Mike J
    Participant

    I’m glad the pilot escaped almost unscathed. A shame about the aeroplane though 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 3,162 total)