No, and no. Have you ever looked at how a Spitfire undercarriage system operates?
Wops
I thought the last Spitfire based over in that part of the world was MT719 🙂
Does the FAA museum have another?
Yes. A largely new-build project to which they have attached the identity of N5518.
http://www.fleetairarm.com/Uploads/Files/en-GB/gloster_sea_gladiator%20low%20res.pdf
It’s not a service I am ever likely to use, but if a bus service was available and
widely advertised, I would expect it to be very popular.I can only go by my experiences with the park and ride from Lakenheath to Mildenhall.
But this is not a regular park and ride service. It would be a one-off bus from Whittlesford station to outside Duxford airfield, so would only suit people arriving by train at just before the time the bus is due to depart, therefore would just serve arrivals from a maximum of two trains (one southbound and one northbound) on the Saturday only (so Legends and the September show only). It would also need to fight its way through the peak traffic going into the airfield. I would therefore suggest that it would have limited appeal.
I must say that I recently read that RR sales engineers in wartime visited advanced airbases to purposely provide incorrect maintenance tips to mechanics servicing Napier Sabres, causing a few Tempests to sink in the Channel.
An interesting comment, can you provide the source please.
hampden98, you seem to be missing the point entirely.
The whole point of this exercise is to be seen to be cutting non-essential expenditure. Many civilian employees employed by the armed services are being laid off without pay. The military have obviously decided to make a political point by cutting the most public manifestation of their activities, whilst protecting the combat effectiveness of their forces. Therefore, all support for airshows, flyovers of sporting events, etc is being suspended whilst sequestration is in effect.
It has nothing to do with not being able to afford an air force, nothing to do with ‘bean counters shuffling money about’ (whatever that is supposed to mean). It is a decision by the top echelons in each of the armed forces as to where they will make cutbacks to non-essential activities.
A proper Mew Gull, with the original canopy.
Isn’t there one being done, supposedly in the colours of Tom Campbell Black’s aeroplane?
http://www.caa.co.uk/application.aspx?catid=60&pagetype=65&appid=1&mode=detail&aircrafttype=mew gull&dataindex=1
NEEMA,
That’s what we all keep telling a friend, who insists on collecting (and flying) examples of types powered by the OX-5. It doesn’t seem to deter him, though! He did buy one of those new-fangled round-engined aeroplanes last year, but I think he got confused when he couldn’t find anywhere to pour the glycol in, so he’s since sold it on. 🙂
Does a lake of that size really have a maximum depth of only 5 feet?
I am wondering what effect the enforced US defence cuts will have on RIAT this year. Were they expected to have a significant presence?
As it stands at the moment, there will be no US military support, static or flying, for any airshows worldwide after 1 April. Again, this is subject to month-to-month review.
The Blues have already announced the same thing, along with the USAF Heritage Flights and USN F/A-18 Tac Demos. The F-22 Demo Team has been greounded with immediate effect (even for the previously-scheduled March events). Apparently these groundings will be subject to a month-to-month review, depending on whether the politicians get a budget agreed, although quite a few of the military airshows scheduled for the summer have already been cancelled altogether.
15 years after the Wrights alleged “achievement” there was not one single significant successful American production ………aero engine in existence.
Whilst there is a lot of truth in your claim, I’d argue that the OX-5 was a very successful engine. It might not have been the most advanced or reliable, but numerous examples were still giving service into the 1930s.
Before anyone gets too excited at the prospect of a P-47, it consists of recovered wreckage. It seems that a forum member here tried unsuccessfully to acquire it some while back.
http://www.warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8098
A picture of the displayed wreck
SR71 looks like it has been repainted as well..
Count the number of crew positions! 😉
Mark,
The real problem with that, as has been proven time and time again in the old car world, and recently manifested itself with a Spitfire XVI, is when in a few years someone Hoovers up all the ‘left over’ parts, assembles them into a pile, and claims that they have the ‘original’. Cue lots of lawyers rubbing their hands, a nasty, drawn-out legal battle, and much general unpleasantness.