dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,611 through 2,625 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Robert Taylor – Aviation Artist #946722
    Mike J
    Participant

    Tried them too!

    Again, no reply.

    Perhaps they just are not interested in earning their client any money.

    They’re not answering the phone???? :confused:

    in reply to: Robert Taylor – Aviation Artist #946726
    Mike J
    Participant

    I believe that The Military Gallery were absorbed by Aces High at Wendover. It might be worth a call to them.

    http://www.aceshighgallery.co.uk/contactus

    in reply to: HAC Hurricane Sale #947190
    Mike J
    Participant

    my absolute fantasy is to own a Hurricane, cant understand it not being sold…

    3 reasons why it didn’t sell:

    1) It’s not a Spitfire

    2) It wasn’t made in America

    …….and

    3) It’s not a Spitfire.

    in reply to: India 1920s #947665
    Mike J
    Participant

    Thanks for posting those Bar Side. Takes me back to the early days of Shuttleworth’s example, which wore a similar scheme.

    in reply to: St Athan. Not open to public collection of the 1990s #947675
    Mike J
    Participant

    …..
    Percival Proctor III LZ776 – Duxford

    The Proctor is Z7197, presently stored at Stafford I believe. The Duxford example, LZ766, came from Skyfame and was never part of the RAF Museum collection

    in reply to: Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow #950325
    Mike J
    Participant

    My understanding put simply is the same as the TSR2, America never came up with it & didn’t want anyone else to have it!!!!!

    Ooooh, I do love a good conspiracy theory! 😀

    in reply to: Strange 'Air Ministry' Document? #950473
    Mike J
    Participant

    As you say, all very strange. The J/1 was a post-war Auster (the first example, G-AGTO is still operational with Mark Miller at Duxford)

    The date as typed reads ‘19440’? A typo for ‘1949’ perhaps. The document appears to be a record of annual inspection and work carried out, as part of the aeroplane’s log book entry.

    in reply to: Red Tails DVD #950523
    Mike J
    Participant

    Yes, you’re right,of course. I guess what I was thinking was that Lucas paid the marketing expense for the film, since no distributor would touch it, and he made back that $40 million and then some.

    Gross box office takings less the theatres’ cut means that I’m sure he didn’t come close to recouping even the marketing costs.

    in reply to: Red Tails DVD #952347
    Mike J
    Participant

    I thought ‘Red Tails’ was bad until I got hold of a DVD of ‘Thunder over Reno’ earlier this week. ‘Bad’ doesn’t even begin to describe it. It’s not the $6 that I begrudge so much as the wasted 90 minutes of my life that I’ll never get back.

    in reply to: Spitfire RW382…. #952541
    Mike J
    Participant

    Wasn’t it a low-back last time around? Or am I imagining things.

    in reply to: Hurricane Auction – Mon 3 December, Brooklands #952546
    Mike J
    Participant

    I fear another UK warbird may be heading across the pond ?

    Which would not be unreasonable, considering that an airworthy one has just come the other way.

    In any case, this is a Canadian-built one which served only in Canada, so I wouldn’t class it purely as a UK warbird.

    in reply to: Hurricane Auction – Mon 3 December, Brooklands #952962
    Mike J
    Participant

    My money’s on it remaining unsold. It has been on the market for a while, along with the NZ example, and there has also been talk of the Ed Russell one also being available. We’ll all know the answer to that in a few days, though.

    in reply to: Which twin-Merlin powered LSR car is this? #954050
    Mike J
    Participant

    Wouldn’t it be great if the remains could be rediscovered and exhumed and a restoration based around the surviving parts, in a similar fashion to Parry-Thomas’ Babs and Campbell’s Bluebird K7.

    in reply to: Total number of airworthy WWII aircraft? #954546
    Mike J
    Participant

    ……..And that is after the recent dtatbase purge to eliminate “paper only” planes…but not all are airworthy of course.

    Actually, the recent FAA purge did nothing of the sort, it simply required owners to reconfirm details of the aircraft registered to them. It made no attempt to verify the existence of actual airframes, so I’m sure many owners holding just the paperwork to types that they consider of value have reregistered them.

    I’m sure the exercise did eliminate a lot of the ‘dross’ though, doubtless along with the registrations of some stored projects where the owners have passed on or just didn’t bother or otherwise neglected to reregister them.

    in reply to: C-45 Paint Schemes #955196
    Mike J
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 2,611 through 2,625 (of 3,162 total)