dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ju52/3m at Duxford #1070916
    Mike J
    Participant

    It’s not a Junkers, it is an Amiot AAC.1 Toucan. Totally different aeroplane altogether, apparently. 😉

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1077464
    Mike J
    Participant

    http://www.iwm.org.uk/exhibitions/iwm-duxford/conservation-in-action

    “The restoration and conservation programme at IWM Duxford is one of the largest operations of its kind in the world.” 🙂

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1077875
    Mike J
    Participant

    Whilst on the subject of IWM Duxford’s restorations, does anyone know the status of the Bolingbroke? It was part-restored by ARCo quite a few years ago, listed for inclusion in AirSpace and shown on the initial plans for it, and then placed in storage in a part-completed state.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1078417
    Mike J
    Participant

    The CASA 2-111 is NOT being disposed of!

    ….yet. Which seems the most illogical part of the whole sorry affair. Why keep an unrestored, non-original, post-war, foreign-built version of a Luftwaffe type, which needs a lot of work to bring up to display standard, whilst getting rid of 2 aircraft which fall into the same category, and on which the IWM has lavished a considerable amount of time, effort and money to restore?

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1080172
    Mike J
    Participant

    Off the top of my head there is Hercules -Chinook-Hawk T.1 for starters

    Retiring the Chinook? I very much doubt that will happen within the next 2 decades!

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1081771
    Mike J
    Participant

    A sad day. I’m sure that future generations will look back on ‘Caravan Club Man’s custodianship of the Duxford collection with dismay. Once they’re gone, they’re gone. 🙁

    in reply to: RE8 / Snipe / Albatros (Photo Diary) #1083635
    Mike J
    Participant

    Thanks Lobster, will Kermits’ Snipe be a flyer?

    It has already flown quite a bit, both in New Zealand and Florida. I do hope he keeps it flyable long-term and doesn’t just park it in a corner once the initial enthusiasm wanes.

    in reply to: Burma Spitfires #1085387
    Mike J
    Participant

    Update from the Telegraph.

    …….from 4 months ago!

    in reply to: Three good reasons to go to Shuttleworth this year #1086428
    Mike J
    Participant

    As I remember it being said at the time, the LVG needed a costly new radiator to be manufactured, and without a long-term commitment from the RAF Museum to continue the loan, it was decided to return it.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1087028
    Mike J
    Participant

    What happened to the second Rapide that CW used to operate (in RAF trainer markings)? I’ve not seen any photos of it for a year or two.

    in reply to: Tangmere Fury Flies Again #1087031
    Mike J
    Participant

    I was thinking the same thing as I watched the Hind and the Demon flying together this evening….

    Keep ’em crossed!

    I suspect that politics would preclude it ever happening at Old Warden. Maybe some day at Duxford, though.

    in reply to: RE8 and Albatros reproductions for RAF Museum #1087456
    Mike J
    Participant

    Nice to see that the Snipe (presumably a non-flyer?) has been put into post-WWI markings. As with most collections worldwide, the RAF Museum has comparatively few aircraft to represent the 1919-1939 period.

    in reply to: Stuka build #947507
    Mike J
    Participant

    I was wondering if you restored a Stuka to 100% airworthiness would you be allowed to vertically dive it? I know you probably wouldn’t want to, but could you with current laws, restrictions?

    ‘Allowed’ by whom? I suspect the answer to your question depends every much on the country, and the jurisdiction of which airworthiness authority, you are talking about. What would be acceptable to the CAA on a Permit to Fly in the UK may well be very different from an Experimental aircraft registered in the US with the FAA.

    in reply to: Was the Anson ubiquitous? #949098
    Mike J
    Participant

    Let’s end this thread before this silliness gets serious.

    Perhaps it would avoid all these unnecessary complications for your readers if you just call it a “British Beech 18”! 😉

    in reply to: Anson Mk.I close to flight #949102
    Mike J
    Participant

    Ref Oxcart, post 57. MANDATORY viewing for all on this forum.

    Agreed. A magnificent achievement by all concerned in the rebuild. What a lovely sight (and sound)! 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 3,162 total)