A precursor of J-20 has been found:diablo:
😎
For Christ’s sake man!! are you trying to start a flame war or something?….shame on you!

Vitaly Kuzmin’s photo-reportage of the 790th Fighter Regiment based @ Hotiilovo:
MiG-31:
http://vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/354
MiG-31 & Su-27:
http://vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/355
Su-27 maintenance & repair:
Dj, is the ‘Phantom Ray’ competing with NG’s X-47B, or will the US procure both types (as opposed to ‘land-i-fying’ the X-47B)?
I much prefer the X-47B, looks more the part.
Sanem, doesn’t nEUROn count?
Is the full functionality being offered or is it a potential the aircraft can do? From my understanding nothing is published about what has been offered.
The Government of India has requested proposals from several foreign suppliers, including the United States, to provide the next generation attack helicopter for the Indian Air Force. In this competition, the Government of India has yet to select the Boeing-United States Army proposal. This notification is being made in advance so that, in the event that the Boeing- U.S. Army proposal is selected, the United States might move as quickly as possible to implement the sale. If the Government of India selects the Boeing-U.S. Army proposal, the Government of India will request a possible sale of 50 T700-GE-701D engines, 12 AN/APG-78 Fire Control Radars, 12 AN/APR-48A Radar Frequency Interferometers, 812 AGM-114L-3 HELLFIRE LONGBOW missiles, 542 AGM-114R-3 HELLFIRE II missiles, 245 STINGER Block I-92H missiles, and 23 Modernized Target Acquisition Designation Sight/Pilot Night Vision Sensors, rockets, training and dummy missiles, 30mm ammunition, transponders, simulators, global positioning system/inertial navigation systems, communication equipment, spare and repair parts; tools and test equipment, support equipment, repair and return support, personnel training and training equipment; publications and technical documentation, U.S. Government and contractor engineering and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics support to be provided in conjunction with a proposed direct commercial sale of 22 AH-64D Block III APACHE Helicopters. The estimated cost is $1.4 billion.
The Block III Apache features a 701D engine, composite rotor blades, improved networking and communications avionics, and an Improved Drive System of the 21st Century — known as IDS-21 — Face Gear Transmission.
“The new 701D engine has a significant increase in reliability based on new coating, new metal and increased airflow which allows it to operate at higher temperatures,” Bailey said.
http://www.helihub.com/2011/04/08/first-next-generation-ah-64-block-iii-apache-under-construction/
Easily the most capable machine in the tender. Maybe the Indian Army can get a nice deal following the recent revelations @ Abbottabad! 😉
MiG-29UPG @ Zhukovskii today:

Thales’ ‘cloud TRM’ won’t be here tomorrow, but the tech will be immensely important to the Indians for applications on AMCA, future UAVs/UCAVS (possibly even FGFA), even if they have to co-fund it.
It’s timeline will bring them upto speed with industry leaders such as Raytheon and Northrop Grumman, an intention which may have been a major factor in the so-called ‘mature’ tech of US fighters’ being rejected.
Just behind the cockpit there seems to be slight hump , is that for additional fuel not seen on other flankers ?
No, it appears to be some new avionics/EW kit. The ‘bump’ offset from the (new) OLS seems to be IFF. There’s a whole host of new stuff on the serial version. Awesome machine.

High-res c/o QuadroFX.
Nice find Mack8. Note similar cannon muzzle cover to PAK-FA, interesting bulge on the port side, offset from IRST. I’m surprised they didn’t use the T-50’s holographic HUD.

Kovy says you could almost fit the moon in Rafale’s radome, a size which should be adequate for those Meteors:

Pictures tell more than thousand words, but that doesn’t prevent some people from denying things until someone “trustable” says so. Quite weird this kind of behaviour!
Hey Big Nose!! I means Scorps sweety, in this pic which of the two is nearest the camera? ’cause if it’s Rafale- then that’s a pretty stark & damning comparison of the radome sizes!!
…more ammunition for Team EF in Germany, post the nice media relations lady @ Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH the pic- but don’t call her große Nase.
In theory using the same pylons that are used with the external fuel tanks solves this problem, but it creates another, lack of fuel.
What happened to Eurofighter’s CFT plans? Non-starter?

As for the Rafale it would be a good choice based solely in the merits of performance. Yet, overall it hardly compares to the Super Hornet or even Viper for that matter.
Oh dear, the downfall of a mantra, from “Nothing Comes Close” to “I could have been a contender. I could have been somebody!“

Scooter gave the Rafale the ‘Kiss of Death’- EF it is!! YAAAY!!
@Jo: Rafale would not have been short-listed if IAF was unwilling to purchase it. Come on.
Rafale makes the cut as per technical evaluation (at least that’s the official/public line), the points I mention (and L1) come into play between now & decision time- otherwise it would’ve been a shortlist of 1 (EF) :D.
I believe the EF will be selected for the following reasons:
1. More diverse offsets in terms of technology transfer & workshare, access to EJ-200 assembly/production will be a huge coup;
2. ‘Partnership’ status for both civil & military future projects;
3. Selex swashplate AESA’s less risk (and hence lower cost) than Thales’ GaN conformal arrays;
4. Superior A2A capability (imho);
5. The IAF like aircraft with huge growth potential (think Su-30MKI), the EF appears to have moreso than Rafale (especially space-wise);
6. Price competitive, and unwillingness to be Rafale’s launch customer (the Rafale’s export orders numbering a grand total of zero will have a significant impact unless the French can bend over backwards in terms of ToT/workshare & pricing).
Factors favouring Rafale:
1. Superior (or more mature) A2G capability.
However I still fear a dumping from the Eurofighter using the profit of Airbus (France created by half may I recall) to pay for the financial fiasco of the EADS defense department…
The numbers game:
At the edge of winning or losing the competition, both the semifinal contenders could cut down their prices by at least four to five million US$ per aircraft.
It may be noted that according to industry insiders, Rafale had put a quote of US$ 85 million per aircraft and Eurofighter $100 million per aircraft in flyaway condition in the recent Brazilian competition.
The cost of Boeing F/A 18 Super Hornet, which was also in this competition, is not known but its cost to the US Navy per aircraft was $ 49.9 million in 2007.
How much the Rafale and Eurofighter quote now is anybody’s guess, but $ 75 to 80 million per aircraft in flyaway condition is what I would wager on. The F 18 Super Hornet perhaps would have been in the range of $ 60 to 65 million…
Imo , we will see the F 35 operating from IN carriers within the next 10 years.
The IN is an official partner in the AMCA, so the F-35 could be a fall-back option.
Obligatory, 840(Rafale)/1360 (EF) = 0.6176 [x100]= 61.67, hence Rafale has ~38% less modules than EF’s AESA (not 61%). However, 38% is a huge number, but the IAF may be swayed by Thale’s conformal ‘cloud’ GaN AESAs under development for the Rafale for the second half of this decade- otherwise the IAF will most definitely go for the larger nosed EF.
Besides, Eurofighter consortium (EADS) has much more diverse offerings than Dassault (silly naval EF notwithstanding!).