dark light

Dunbar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 113 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Battle of Britain 75th Mass formation 15th Sept 2015 #877748
    Dunbar
    Participant

    I’m not the only person who has asked what the point was in gathering so many aircraft together when the most I (and most people) saw in the air together was eight. Nice though the idea was, it all seemed rather pointless.

    The veterans and public I’ve spoken to didn’t seem to think so. Eric Brown told me he thought it was tremendous, as did Peter Hale, Joe Roddis and others. For those at Goodwood, the experience of seeing so many aircraft. For those who saw them fly over, something of the excitement of being part of it. For those who saw it on the global media coverage, a reminder of sacrifices made and of our heritage.

    Far from pointless.

    in reply to: You lot like a whinge… #877763
    Dunbar
    Participant

    Honestly, you lot.

    Dermot wasn’t chosen, he was part of the production team that wanted to make this vision a reality along with Matt Jones. He is enthused, popular, and without the involvement of him and c4 this may not have happened. Prince Harry is a good friend of Boultbee and again his presence ensured that the worlds press were engaged. Remember also this programme was a companion piece to a more factual one shown on Sunday. It was what is termed ‘as live’…impossible to do live because of the vagaries of the day, but it hopefully captured some if the atmosphere of the day.

    Matt wanted to commemorate the sacrifices of those who were involved in the BoB on a grand scale, a tremendous achievement. It wasn’t perfect, nothing is. But it was something very special indeed.

    Dunbar
    Participant

    I have a strong sense that this ad was in one of the RAF year books that my Dad used to buy me from the Royal Tournament…

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #903960
    Dunbar
    Participant

    The greatest problem with speculation on an open forum is that those most driven to do it are generally the least qualified to do so. And now we have someone running tests on a computer game.

    I worked with Andy professionally and respect him as a careful and very skilled pilot. I also have experience of displaying warbirds. Yes, there have been quite a few conversations between display pilots over the last day, speaking about what could have gone and expressing shock that one of our best has had tragedy befall him and others. However these conversations generally end with the comment “we’ll have to wait for the report” since we have no way of knowing at the moment whether the cause was human error, mechanical failure or environmental, or a combination of factors.

    It just seems to me that the speculators have their own pet theories that they are keen to advance without full knowledge of the facts. It’s tiresome and indicative of a lack of practical knowledge and experience in the field.

    Talk about your pet theories with your mates if you have to but spare the rest of us- you condemn yourself out of your own mouths.

    in reply to: July 10th 75 years ago today, The Battle of Britain #861764
    Dunbar
    Participant

    I’d replace the word fun with ‘interesting’.

    John, do you spend much time with school age kids? Things do need to be bought alive for them. I’m lucky enough to be in a position to shoe them into the cockpit of a Spitfire should they want to. That seems to work. School visits to Hendon, Cosford, Kennington? I’m sure that would also be effective, coupled with a project of some sort. I remember clearly as a young lad having an actor come to the school as a historical character. Very impressive, bought it alive, made it interesting.

    in reply to: July 10th 75 years ago today, The Battle of Britain #863849
    Dunbar
    Participant

    Thinking of you today Tim. Meeting you And your colleagues on the day we flew around your haunts with the Spit and Hurricane in formation was one of the highlights of my flying career.

    Have a well deserved tot. Best regards.

    Dunbar
    Participant

    Don’t we?

    in reply to: Squadron Michael Wainwright – Battle of Britain #868858
    Dunbar
    Participant

    That was a special day. Hope you’re well Tim

    J

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #879922
    Dunbar
    Participant

    Some great pics, thanks for sharing. I was flying SM520 today, always nice to see from another perspective.

    in reply to: P51 rides at Duxford? #922828
    Dunbar
    Participant

    Boultbee are the only ones who have actually delivered so far under SSA&C. Still, who would have thought a few years ago that there are would be now at least 2 operators with excellent reputations (Boultbee and Biggin) offering flights to the public? Great news

    Dunbar
    Participant

    hi Bruce

    BFA Spits still doing pilot only courses but this may well change in the near future.

    Chrs

    in reply to: 2014 – RNHF Sea Fury incident at Culdrose #922924
    Dunbar
    Participant

    I suppose that if the gear was down and you were unsure if you would make the field you might select it back up then drop it again when you know you’re going to get in. Whatever, great job to walk away from it.

    Dunbar
    Participant

    Good chance that with potential legislation changes( possibly very soon) BFA at Goodwood will be offering flights to non pilots under informed consent ruleset. If you get the chance, take it….there are few things more overwhelming than a first Spitfire flight.

    in reply to: Biggin Hill this morning. #974899
    Dunbar
    Participant

    Not as such – but you do have the ability to turn on and off the flying cover aspect of the policy (maintenance, off season etc) which will reduce the premium.

    The problem here for an operator seeking to recoup some of the outlay is of course that the less the aircraft flies the more the cost per hour to operate. Also fixed maintenance schedules may dictate an annual service regardless of hours flown. In an ideal world the operating costs are covered by commercial activities whilst the well maintained asset gradually appreciates in value. Not an easy task.

    Still, it’s worth it and here’s a nice clip of a well primed start of SM520 to remind us why…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JHrbUnaMQ0&feature=youtu.be

    Cheers!

    in reply to: Biggin Hill this morning. #975249
    Dunbar
    Participant

    Hi Septic

    It’s probably more to do with hours on the airframe than fuel…all the costs of operating a Spitfire (they are substantial) are factored into the hours the a/c flies…a very rough price is in the order of £4k+ per hour if the a/c flies around 50 hours a year. It’s also not as simple as flying over other services, most flypasts require prior permission from the CAA…i think putting four up is a fantastic effort!

    At Boultbee today, we combined a Remembrance display with the scattering of the ashes of Stapme Stapleton from SM520. His brother and family were there also…very poignant and fitting.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 113 total)