dark light

papajuliet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 24th March – A Tragic Night In 1944 #820465
    papajuliet
    Participant

    The “night of the big winds” An uncle, piloting a 44 sqd. Lanc, was lost on this raid. Shot down by flak near Dusseldorf on the return trip, having strayed over the Ruhr defences because of the unexpected wind strength. He had done about 14 ops, so far as I’ve been able to find out, so it was what you might call an experienced crew for that particular period.

    in reply to: Percival Prentice VS331 – maintenance serial 7404M #789374
    papajuliet
    Participant

    It was the first aircraft I ever flew in – as a CCF cadet. Ternhill 6 May 1953.

    in reply to: Percival Prentice VS331 – maintenance serial 7404M #790568
    papajuliet
    Participant

    Thank you Rob – that’s just what I wanted.

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #820440
    papajuliet
    Participant

    I think Hixon can be discounted. There are no blister hangars on the detailed site plan which I have.

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #822011
    papajuliet
    Participant

    I didn’t think that Chipping Warden had blisters. On checking the link in the message referring to it, I see that it goes to Chipping Norton which DID have blisters [ I’m not suggesting that the mystery Spit. was there ].

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #823064
    papajuliet
    Participant

    Of the two men in the photo., the one on the left has pilot’s wings and the other seems to have a flying brevet of some type – my guess is also pilot’s wings. Isn’t the likely scenario that one man was flying the aircraft when it crashed, he’s then visited the wreck, with his mate, to have a souvenir photo. taken ?
    Do either of the men appear in the other photos. associated with this one ?

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #823237
    papajuliet
    Participant

    It’s a blister hangar [ looks like a Miskins steel frame type ] but that type of hangar was used at so many airfields – fighter and maintenance in particular – that I don’t think it’s any help in identifying the aircraft.

    in reply to: World War 2 Halifax aircraft in Worcester #834011
    papajuliet
    Participant

    I’m almost certain that it was mid war when I saw the Halifax in Walsall. There was a Boston placed in front of it. The cockpit canopy of that was open for viewing of the cockpit from a platform alongside.
    Search as I may I can’t find any report of that display although there was a Walsall ” Wings for Victory” week in April 1943. I assume the display was part of that.

    in reply to: World War 2 Halifax aircraft in Worcester #834211
    papajuliet
    Participant

    I wonder if this is the same one which was displayed in Walsall in that year ? I remember going over it. I didn’t go inside – I think it must have been a walkway over a wing.

    papajuliet
    Participant

    Perhaps 554 is a clerical error. Checking [ in Francis Mason’s book on the Lancaster ] the record of all those shown in the card, the E is against aircraft which crashed in known circumstances. The M is against those missing.
    Until 1950 damage was assessed on an A to E scale. Since that date it’s been 1 to 5. Cat 5 means beyond repair. It must follow that E meant the same.

    in reply to: Bristol Brigands at the ATDU #890366
    papajuliet
    Participant

    An Aeroplane Magazine database shows the following two as with the ATDU at some stage in their lives……
    RH747 black and white image shows grey [?] top surfaces and light coloured lower
    RH742 colour image shows mid grey upper and what looks like sky below – it’s carrying a torpedo so, presumably, was with the ATDU at the time
    RH754 colour image heads the magazine article, a torpedo is carried but there’s no reference to a unit. colour is overall [ dirty ] white with mid grey upper surfaces of wings and tailplane only both of which have the white colour wrapped back over their leading edges for a few inches. Fuselage is all white except for a small area of mid grey in front of the cockpit as anti-dazzle. Engine nacelles are all over white with grey upper where they protrude at the trailing edge of the wing.

    in reply to: 1690 BDTF RAF Metheringham #864504
    papajuliet
    Participant

    From RAF Flying Training and Support Units published by Air-Britain –
    “formed 15 2 44 ex1485 Flt. in 5 Grp. at Syerston. 13 7 44 to Scampton [det. at Fiskerton 11 5 44 to 21 9 44] with 7 Spifire ll, 8 Martinet, 12 Hurricane llc. To Metheringham 27 9 44. To Syerston 4 6 45 disbanded 12 10 45”.
    Code 9M
    Sample aircraft – Spitfire llb P8503. Hurricane llc,lV LF374 code 9M-A. Tiger Moth ll R5245. Oxford ll P6809. Martinet l MS691. Wellington X LN457.

    in reply to: RIP David Fiddimore #896395
    papajuliet
    Participant

    Having read one, I had to read the whole series. Agree with Moggy. Highly recommended reads.
    Very sorry to hear of the author’s death – always thought he was older than 70 because his books seemed to have been written by someone “who was there”.

    in reply to: Fradley/Lichfield air show disaster 18.9.48 #898734
    papajuliet
    Participant

    It’s a sobering fact but the RAF lost a total of six aircraft on 18th.Sept. 1948 – a Tiger Moth at Dyce, a Spitfire PR19 at Leuchars [ pilot killed], three Mosquitoes at Lichfield [ two killed], Manston [two aircrew and ten civilians killed] and Coningsby [two aircrew killed] respectively and an Oxford at Lindholme.

    papajuliet
    Participant

    The book ” The Hornet’s Nest a history of 100 squadron.” contains a facsimile of the battle order for that operation.It only shows ED559 as D. – no squadron codes. The book has a photo of a 100 squadron crew standing in front of ED988, coded FZ. Harry Holmes’ book shows that aircraft as HW-J.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)