dark light

turboshaft

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 199 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System #2045613
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Hellfire is closer to $150K than $65K. The replacement JCM program is (was…) targeting a full rate production cost of $80K ($120K during LRIP).

    Another system with good potential for MOUT ops such as CS would be something like LOCAAS, capable of being retasked and with sufficient endurance to wait out the target, but still offering low collatoral damage.

    in reply to: Kiowa Warrior #2619975
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Lively debate on the MMS vs. chin turret question over on Kiowa Pilots for the past couple of months: see Kiowapilots.com.

    in reply to: Kiowa Warrior #2620019
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Yeah, but it’s no fun unless you use it…

    http://www.kiowapilots.com/gallery/data/515/150cal_6-med.jpg

    😀

    in reply to: Export Orders???? #2622254
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Or just wait until the richer nations of the world buy F-22s/F-35s/Rafales/EFs, and then snap up those F-16C Blk50/25s, F-15C/Es, FA-18Cs, etc.

    turboshaft
    Participant

    As I understand it, the frontrunner is now the C-37.

    Keep in mind there are two requirements here. As already stated, the Navy may well merge the role into the P-8 program, or even the BAMS effort. Should a joint-service effort prove too hard, the Army could go back to the ERJ145, or even choose to pursue a common platform with FCA.

    in reply to: Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System #2045901
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Several UAVs already tapped to carry APKWS, which offers a lightweight low-cost alternative to Hellfire.

    The US Navy is also developing a guided version of the 2.75″ round, the Low-Cost Guided Imaging Rocket (LOGIR). In this instance the guidance is IR.

    The other low-cost system being marketed for the tactical UAV market is Viper Strike, a laser-guided variant of the BAT submunition.

    in reply to: F-35 name #2627739
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Looks like Kestrel’s a no-go; the Marines have reportedly taken the name for the US101 Presidential Helicopter.

    in reply to: New Iraqi Air Force #2628103
    turboshaft
    Participant

    The recent fatal crash was a Comp Air 7SL.

    in reply to: New Iraqi Air Force #2628383
    turboshaft
    Participant

    There is now a questionmark over whether those W-3WA Sokols will ever be delivered.

    in reply to: F-35 name #2629010
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Kestrel’s been mentioned once or twice within the industry, for whatever that’s worth. Still doesn’t seem to have the same ring as Raptor. Maybe it’ll grow on me.

    Other suggestions:

    F-35 Lightening 1½
    F-35 Streetfighter (or F-35 Janet, as in Janet Street-Fighter). Maybe not…
    F-35 Meteor would’ve been a nice tribute to the F-80, but those dastardly French (MBDA) got there first !

    in reply to: PRV – Personnel Recovery Vehicle #2630520
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Pave Low is already in line to be replaced by the CV-22 (deliveries 2006, EIS 2008), though it is also being offered for PRV as the PRV-22. The second phase of the PRV program specifies a target KPP speed of 300 kts, so the Osprey – although pricey – could offer a common solution to both phases of the program.

    in reply to: No Turboprop fighters after the Wyvern S-4 #2631641
    turboshaft
    Participant

    That was the one. Thanks for jogging the memory !

    in reply to: F-35 WEIGHT LOSS AND BLOCK DEVELOPMENT #2632241
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Lockheed Martin itself believes that the weight issue is well under control – as of the beginning of this year, the weight reduction program for the B had stabilzed at 2,250 lb, which equates to 3,600 lb of extra payload capability. The three-figure weight saving initiatives quoted in the AFA article are the exception to the rule – the average saving for each initiative pursued has been 5 lb.

    in reply to: No Turboprop fighters after the Wyvern S-4 #2632496
    turboshaft
    Participant

    Does anyone recall the pusher-prop ground attack study proposed by BAe in the late ’80s or early ’90s ? IIRC, it was a straight-wing canard design with propfan propulsion.

    turboshaft
    Participant

    IIRC, there was an AAM variant of SRAM considered at one stage.

    Sferrin – IIRC also, the original ASALM specs were closer to M4.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 199 total)