dark light

googeler

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 879 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Questioning the correct name of those Iran fighters #2387948
    googeler
    Participant

    The third one is a photoshop – the mid mounted wing F-5.
    The first one is the indigenous Tazarve trainer, the second ones are Saeqeh – F-5s modified with two tails.

    in reply to: Bekaa Valley 1982 #2390145
    googeler
    Participant

    Also there were no MLD, the most advanced Flogger Syria had at the time was the MF, majority of their Floggers being the ground attack version BN and the impotent MS.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2390497
    googeler
    Participant

    PAF Mirage IIIs with Turkish Airforce F-16, not sure where or when. Courtesy of Gokhan at Pakistani Defence.com

    Bright Star 2009, last October in Egypt

    in reply to: Just how much fuel do you need for a combat mission? #2394609
    googeler
    Participant

    Just how much fuel do you need for a combat mission?

    As much as it is physically possible, and that includes not just the onboard fuel, but also a top-off from a tanker right before entering the danger zone. The more, the better.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2405371
    googeler
    Participant

    MiG-29A (9-12) for Bangladesh Air Force without markings. Since overhaul or new ? :confused:

    Freshly overhauled, not new.
    MiG-29A are not in production since the early 90’s and they weren’t built in the Ukraine any way.
    Lviv is also the place where Kazahstan recently overhauled their Fulcrums too.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2408481
    googeler
    Participant

    Where did you locate the shot of the Burundi Hips mate?

    What I posted is a crop from an official USAF photo found some time ago on their site. It was in a gallery about a joint exercise, unfortunatly that was the only picture showing Burundian birds to any extent.

    F-5F 643 Bahrain on delivery SEP86 Prestwick
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649815
    F-5E 683 Bahrain on delivery SEP86 Prestwick
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649814
    RF-5E 40195 RSAF DEC86 Prestwick
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649817

    STRIKEMASTER 113 KAF DEC86 Prestwick
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649823
    STRIKEMASTER 114 KAF DEC86 Prestwick
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649822

    Regarding bald eagles on third world air forces, there’s a rash lately, even USA’s sworn enemy Iran adopted them:
    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran—Air/Northrop-F-5F-Tiger/1698087/L/
    Laughable, man – Ha Ha! 😉

    in reply to: T-38 replacement #2409279
    googeler
    Participant

    T-50 has everything going for it. It’s partly designed and already partly built in the USA and uses a well known American engine.The fact that it can have an internal gun (as opposed to none on the M-346) is a major selling point for a light attack version.

    True, M-346’s twin engines mean more safety, but also more cost and time in maintenance over time.

    The Hawk, apart from being obsolete as airframe and engine design, would also give too much overlap in capabilities with the T-6 Texan II at the lower end and would fall short at the top end of the performance envelope compared to the other two potential contenders.

    As for building a brand new aircraft, the Pentagon should be running away from such a project, seeing how much have gone overbudget and behind schedule all US aircraft acquisition programs which didn’t rely on an off the shelf or evolutionary solution.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2409517
    googeler
    Participant

    Don’t have exactly what you’re looking for, but still related: active Hips from Burundi and a Rwandan Noratlas, but not the one you’ve asked for

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2410229
    googeler
    Participant

    googler – thanks a heap. But I thought that some F-7s were acquired in the early 1990s. I was not aware of any recent procurements. Is there a source for that ?

    That was commonly thought before, but as I explained there was no trace of F-7s in Tanzania until last year. Photos of their aircraft are rare, but still all types surfaced, except for F-7s. Plenty of people confused the MiG-21s stored in Mwanza as Chinese.

    Apart from the AFM report, there’s also this:
    http://africanbushpilot.blogspot.com/2009/08/tanzanias-air-force-might-on-display.html
    confirming first delivery of F-7 in mid 2009
    and this:
    http://www.fliegerrevue.de/fr_extra.asp?PG=189&AID=22686
    ————–

    Botswana AF CF-116A OJ-6
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649236
    Paraquay AF EMB-312 1053
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649235
    Qatar AF Whirlwind QA-1
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649245
    SU-BLA BEECH 1900 EGYPTIAN AF
    http://www.aircraftslides.com/Auction/AuctionDetail.aspx?ID=649422

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2412749
    googeler
    Participant

    Cuito, I think I disagree a bit. The Tanzanian AF operated significant numbers of MiGs or their Chinese clones: 16 MiG-21s, 12 F-7s and about 10 F-5s and F-6s each.

    At present, I am given to understand only 3-4 F-7s remain airworthy along with at least 3 F-6s.

    I wonder if any new F-7s have been procured or any more are airworthy ?

    As I say, AFM November 2009 purportedly saw 11 F-7 at the airfield at Ngerengere but as I don’t have the issue, I am not sure if these were airworthy or not.

    Anyone have the issue and can confirm ?

    Actually the F-7s are relatively new additions, acquired within the last 3 years or so.

    Until than the only delta fighters were MiG-21 at Mwanza – inoperational since quite a while, and F-6 at Ngerengere. You can take a look at the latter in Google Earth, there’s only F/FT-6 and FT-5 with no place (hangars, HAS) to hide any F-7. Equally, pictures taken at Mwanza over the time show only MiG-21.

    in reply to: World Cup airspace defence #2377749
    googeler
    Participant

    Has the Hawk 127 been cleared for carrying AAMs? Or a gun pod like the British Hawk T.1A has? I assume the SAAF does not have a stock of Sidewinders lying around.

    Without some armament capability they would be pretty useless in the air policing role would they not?

    SAAF has the Hawk Mk120, 127 is the Australian version.
    And according to this:
    http://www.saairforce.co.za/the-airforce/aircraft/40/hawk-mk-120
    it it capable to carry the 30 mm Aden gun pod, but no AAMs.
    Still good enough for guarding stadiums 😉

    in reply to: World Cup airspace defence #2377775
    googeler
    Participant

    I’d heard that SA have a pilot problem too, something to do with trying to equalise the race mixture of fighter pilots and tossing out some of the good pilots based solely on race.

    That too, but their main problem is the ridiculously low number of flight hours
    http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Air-force-navy-just-for-show-20100304

    – That the Gripens will spend 550 hours in flight in the current financial year, after which this will be scaled down to 250 flight hours per year for the next two years
    […]
    “Concerning the air force: We have 11 Gripens and 550 flight hours available this year, which means they are flying less than half of the hours required to comply with Nato (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) standards. Most of these hours will be used during the 2010 World Cup, and between July and the end of the financial year, these fighter jets will be standing in their hangars,”

    in reply to: Mil Mi 4 Hound #2378524
    googeler
    Participant

    Here’s a Vietnamese one in the Hanoi museum:
    http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircraft/Museums/VietnameseAirForce/Helicopters/index.html
    plus one grainy, partial shot of it in service, and an Indonesian museum piece

    in reply to: Eurofighter For Slovakia? #2379242
    googeler
    Participant

    Moot point, eagle. The Greeks and Turks have been on the brink of war several times, yet both acquired and continue to buy the F-16 in significant numbers.

    Eurofighter’s PR effort is understandable, but it’s far from being the perfect fighter for Slovakia – a small, landlocked country with a small defence budget and minimal threats – both present and forseeable, which needs aircraft for peacetime air policing and maybe a few for deployment as part of a coalition.

    Gripen would be the most logical solution – see swerve’s post, followed by F-16.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2379834
    googeler
    Participant

    MiG-29 Sniper
    Upgrade attempt for Romanian Air Force, by Israeli firms. First flight occurred on 5 May 2000. The program was halted along with the retiring of Romanian MiG-29s in 2003. The latter occurred because of high maintenance costs, which led to the Romanian Government’s decision to halt the MiG-29 program and further invest in the MiG-21 LanceR program.

    Would have been interesting to see if this program had have been completed, a Mig-29 with the latest Israeli upgrades might have been a hard plane to beat

    Well, the Sniper upgrade was not as comprehensive as the LanceR upgrade, in fact it was quite limited. Crucially, the radar and weapon systems remained the same, Soviet “A” export standard.

    This upgrade only brought a new glass cockpit, HUD, nav-com, computers, MIL-1553 data bus, IFF and some other minor changes. No structural upgrades, no airframe or engine life extension, not even wing fuel tanks as for the German or – more recently – Slovak Fulcrums.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 879 total)