dark light

googeler

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 879 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan AF #2591103
    googeler
    Participant

    roberto yeager wrote:

    Oh!!!

    Thats a Qatar Mirage f-1

    The mistake is not that big, there were Pakistani ground crews, technicians and pilots working for Qatar and UAE on their Mirages.

    in reply to: Can you speak something of the North Korea air force? #2591132
    googeler
    Participant

    daxiong, here’s a .kmz file (works if you have Google Earth, if you don’t have it, you can download it for free). You’ll find in this file placemarks for MiG-15/17/19/21/23 and Su-25 (the latter can be seen very clearly, even the roundel on the wings is visible)

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2591159
    googeler
    Participant

    So now we’re posting pictures of jellyfish in the sky…wonder what’s next

    in reply to: Merkava-4 is only SO-SO!. #1810922
    googeler
    Participant

    FOX NEWS is reporting over 60 tanks been destroy since the war started almost 30 days ago!.comment anyone?

    No way. Around 25 vehicles (tanks, APCs and armoured buldozers) have been hit so far – damage ranging from a few pieces of add-on armour smashed to crew compartment and weapon compartment breaches (the messy ones). Most vehicles hit are repairable, even if towed away.

    in reply to: Can you speak something of the North Korea air force? #2592353
    googeler
    Participant

    Some more detailed Air Force data here:
    http://www.scramble.nl/kp.htm
    and some pics:

    in reply to: Odd MiG-23 at Tyndall #2592564
    googeler
    Participant

    The MiGs in the picture don’t seem to be modified at all. Even if so, they would have modified them back to standard from 1978 till 1992.

    Why is the gun removed if it’s a museum exhibit? Did the ATF bureau keep it?

    in reply to: Show us those interception pictures! #2592763
    googeler
    Participant

    DTJJ, those MiGs are Chinese? I guess if they were North-Vietnamese they’d shot down the RC-135…

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2593508
    googeler
    Participant

    The pair of Su-27 Fulcrums shipped

    It’s Su-27 FLANKER

    regarding the ex-Moldovan Flankers

    Surely you mean FULCRUMS as Moldova never had any Su-27 Flanker, only MiG-29 Fulcrum

    in reply to: The old Iraqi air force #2594482
    googeler
    Participant

    and in 1993 I saw the only SU-24 still in IQAF neer Balad air base .

    So there was a survivor after all – there was a rumor about it.

    and this aircraft has been destroied and cut as alloy by thieves after 2003 war

    The rumor is that it was taken intact to the US. Did you see it being scrapped, like the rest of IrAF?
    here’s the still from the 1990 video:

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2594496
    googeler
    Participant

    That is definitely wrong, when you look at serial numbers (250-251.serie) they were built in fall 1987 or spring 1988 exactly.

    Serials for Yugoslav MiG-29A were 18101-18114 and UB 15301,15302.
    They were delivered in 1987, after refurbisment (being ex-SovAF in storage)

    Did they blame anything else?

    SPO-15 RWR and sometimes radios.

    in reply to: The old Iraqi air force #2594504
    googeler
    Participant

    All the Su-24Ms were evacuated to Iran during Desert Storm and never came back

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2594614
    googeler
    Participant

    Also russians have had enough time and opportunities to remove all the “sensitive” equipment like the jammer Gardenyia

    Gardenyia were removed right after the demise of the USSR, in 1991, before the Soviet troops got out of Moldova. That’s why a Moldovan MiG-29 was shot down in the 1992 civil war by an SA-3 battery of the Soviet 14th army.

    Remember those Serbian Mig-29 pilots claiming their radars suddenly did not work during missions over Yugoslavia in 1999? I doubt that pilots were taking-off for a combat mission knowing that their radars are defective.

    I can’t say what happened exactly, but the Serbian MiG-29s definately had big serviceability problems. They were second-hand ones bought in 1987 from the USSR and were intended to be a stop-gap until the “Novi avion” came into being. Those planes were among the first series-produced Fulcrums (1983-84) and should have been taken out of service by 1996-98.

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2594779
    googeler
    Participant

    Please the cold war is over

    That’s exactly my point; even with the cold war over some (decades old) things are not public yet (like the source of the mentioned MiG-21). So it’s only logical that more recent affairs of this kind would be secret.

    Also, your earlier argument about DACT exercises like Cope India and so on is not valid in this case, everybody knows that you don’t show everything you can do and all your capabilities in an exercise. Furthermore, during such exercises the “opposing force” doesn’t have access to the inside of the “adversary plane”, they can’t analyze extensivley its avionics and electronical equipment, engines and subsystems.

    in reply to: American Sukhoi #2594827
    googeler
    Participant

    There is a need for secrecy in this cases also for protecting the (non-US) individuals involved. I don’t believe the FSB would send a chocolate box to the middle men from Ukraine or Belarus involved in the Su-27 business.
    Think abouit the “Have Doughnut” program (MiG-21F-13 evaluation), which took place in 1968. Almost everything is declassified about it, EXCEPT the source of the MiG (rumored to be Indonesia or Israel)

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #8, for Pictures and Discussion. #2595093
    googeler
    Participant

    Curahee80, those 2 Mi-17s you posted aren’t Kyrgyzstan AF by any means! :rolleyes: They are Russian machines in exercises inside Kyrgyzstan at most.The Kyrgyz roundel is completely different from the old Soviet/Russian red star. (BTW the writing on both the Mi-24 and the second Mi-17 below reads “Khirghizstan” 😎 )

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 879 total)