dark light

DavidS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: More bad A380 news #520119
    DavidS
    Participant

    So if you did work with the duplicated flight numbers providing x number of seats on a network, say transatlantic, surely you corroborated that against given passengers carried by the airlines? Agreed, it can’t be exact by city point but you would get a representative load factor for an airline or group of airlines which would show the numbers as tosh!

    Need to do top down as well as bottom up to check the numbers.
    And before that you’d surely spot the multiple arrivals and departures for a city pair at exactly the same times!

    in reply to: More bad A380 news #520153
    DavidS
    Participant

    Does he know what he’s talking about? Thunderbird 3 was the best looking of the fleet but its design is for space travel not transporting pods containing rescue equipment or fast personal transport to the scene of an earthbound disaster!
    Likewise the A380 is a beautiful beast designed for a particular role. The economics of air travel is going through a tough time at present but there will be an upswing and when it happens the A380 will be in demand.

    Sounds to me as though he has a chip on his shoulder!

    in reply to: Ryanair Ditch Manchester Routes #524061
    DavidS
    Participant

    Market forces do cut both ways and if more airports/handling agents said no to Ryanairs business proposals Ryanair would have to start to pay more and charge more. Whilst there are still airports offering a cheaper alternative, Ryanair will take advantage and have the passengers travel further to that airport.

    When I used to live in Manch, from Oldham or Rochdale, it was just as easy to get to Leeds. I guess now the M62 is much busier and the M60 runs direct to Manch Airport.

    in reply to: Ryanair Ditch Manchester Routes #524087
    DavidS
    Participant

    Someone suggested last week that the developments in Leeds were to attract the Manchester pax so it seems a logical movement. Lets not forget its about making money not providing jobs. And personally I hate that, but it’s today’s world so you have to live with it.

    in reply to: Ryanair's check-in fiasco at Stansted #525521
    DavidS
    Participant

    I wasn’t thinking of maintenance. Do Swissport do that?

    Why do RYR park nose-in to the gate when they don’t use the airstairs? They could get rid of the pushback if they park at an angle. Do their aircraft have internal stairs or do they always use the handling agents? Is that more cost effective than flying around with two sets of steps?

    in reply to: Ryanair's check-in fiasco at Stansted #525529
    DavidS
    Participant

    What is to stop Ryanair handling themselves? Is there anything to say an airline can’t set up their own check-in, baggage handling etc. Could they then fully automate check-in and have people take their own bags to the plane? Why are we stuck with systems from the past? Why are planes different than any other transport mode? Lets dumb it down!
    BTW 4 years since I’ve flown and I probably won’t again! Still work in the industry though!

    in reply to: Ryanair's check-in fiasco at Stansted #525712
    DavidS
    Participant

    Depends where you want to go….my owned house’ nearest airport is Carcassonne and I work in London and live in Bedford so therefore if I want to get there I would fly Ryanair and if I can plan early enough it’s a good price and I think a decent service. As said above, the service is at a level with buses and trains so its a mass transit mode. Forget the idea that air travel is for the select few. Old hat, history!
    Having said all that…I prefer to drive even though its 13 hours from Dunkerque, the cheapest crossing! The drive and country is very pleasant. The car parking and car hire at t’other end all add to the cost making the journey cost about equivalent. If I was on my own I might fly…with the kids I would drive and take a whole lot more luggage with me.

    in reply to: Ryanair's check-in fiasco at Stansted #525881
    DavidS
    Participant

    Presumably Swissport do want Ryanair’s business and therefore have to accept the responsibility that goes with the contract. If Swissport feel they’re not getting paid enough then Ryanair will shop around for another provider. If no other company wants them they’ll have to pay more. Simple law of supply and demand.
    Many of us use other forms of public transport such as buses and trains and to be honest, Ryanair compare well, if not better, than many public transport operators.

    DavidS
    Participant

    Can’t see it happening. Too many NIMBYs don’t want a fast rail line running through their area or destroying the countryside, the present rail system is more expensive than air travel so what will the cost for the passenger be of a brand new rail infrastructure? And this with a background of this and the next government wanting/needing to cut spending!

    in reply to: Am I being absolutely ridiculous? #528377
    DavidS
    Participant

    Has there ever been two accidents to the same flight number? Or for that matter, has there ever been two accidents to the same type on the same route?
    Statistically, maybe you’re safer on AF447?

    in reply to: AVRO Woodford #1199843
    DavidS
    Participant

    If memory serves me right the Andover is/was G-APZV, the prototype. Also, thinking back to the white bits around the radiation shed, these were present when I first started at Woodford in ’75 and the Victor XH670 was still reasonably complete then.

    in reply to: AVRO Woodford #1202296
    DavidS
    Participant

    My comments on dH/HS/BAe were meant to be tongue in cheek!
    de Havilland did design and build very fine aeroplanes and you really can’t beat the DH60 though I would like to see more Avians to compare.
    When I started at Woodford in the mid 70s the sheds were absolutely full of aircraft…Nimmie MR1s to 2s on the left track, Victor tankers down the centre and 748s down the right. No empty spaces!
    Your white Victor bits were probably the end of XH670(?) which languished by the flight sheds for several years.
    Unfortunately, its the same with all aircraft factories as well as any other engineering company in this country.

    Re the book….
    There was a small book published in the late 70s early 80s entitled something like History of Aviation in Manchester which had a very good summary of all companies, Fairey, Hills, Avro…as well as all the airfields. Well worth a read.

    in reply to: AVRO Woodford #1203211
    DavidS
    Participant

    Maybe the Avro people just quietly got on with their work in redesigning dH’s poor airliner into a superb MR aircraft or demonstrating how modern quad-engined aircraft should be built?
    It is the next factory airfield likely to be closed. Maybe then people will miss it though it is in leafy Cheshire and likely to be farmland in double quick time.

    Mixed thoughts as it was my 2nd home for 11 years.

    in reply to: HMS Invincible #2031753
    DavidS
    Participant

    We can’t even find a place for HMS Plymouth (Liverpool and Plymouth don’t want her), what chance a carrier? And if we could, perhaps better to exchange for Hermes and preserve our last proper carrier?

    in reply to: British post-war commercial aircraft survivors #1215696
    DavidS
    Participant

    What was the Consul shipped through Manch airport in the 80s? To Singapore?

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 136 total)