the sad fact is that it took so bl##dy long for our very own country to recognise the men of Bomber Command those powers that be who decided not to for so long should have been ashamed…. and then some person whom I cannot find words bad enough to describe vandalsies it….
Its not celebrating what bomber command did, its remembering the HEROES that stood up to defend our country.
I donate as much as I can to 558 basically to keep her in the air long enough so that I can take my nephew (when he is old enough to appreciate what its job was) to witness the effect of a the vulcan on (nearly) full throttle climbing into the sky, as you all know on here the noise is something that has to be seen to be believed….
I know the project has its death mongers and non supporters, but I really do believe that 558 isnt a drain on other projects, people donate to the fund because they want to see a four engined jet BOMBER flying, as much as I love the VICTOR it has no chance of making it back amongst the clouds. I would donate a lot more to a LIGHTNING project if it were feasable to get one up there.
However the point about engine life is a very valid one and I would like to know the official answer to that before I decide to commit some of my hard earned cash to the cause, Im hoping the answer isnt to totally nurse the aircraft so stretch the lifetime of the engines. nor do I hope its a plan to reduce the appearances…..
ahhh the annual “Wanting to throw my camera kit in the wheelie bin” season begins………..you guys really do p#ss me off with the quality of shots you capture….great work.
I have to admit to turning the radio in the van right up when they throttled up the lancs engines when they had parked up……No voiceover just pure Merlin Magic. One can only wonder what a haunting noise a bomber stream would have sounded like, flying overhead…………
Thanks again chaps, great info!!
Great info gentlemen thanks…..In the CH4 programme it shows the wings being subjected to constant jacking up and down as you quite rightly state…….my next nieve 😮 question is, would the water INSIDE the fusilage be at a higher pressure than the water outside, which Im assuming was basically at open atmosphere pressue….
Please excuse my nievity, but testing the fusilage in the water tank…..am i correct in thinking that whilst submerged in the tank and with the fusilage pressuriesed, any cracks/weakness would show up as escaping air bubbles etc etc….
These pictures are fantastic….Thanks for sharing.
Superb video, can i ask you learned chaps just how much the fitting of those overwing tanks affected the handling and agiltiy of the aircraft.
Thanks for the education chaps…basically it does the same job as an intercooler, or why a car engine performs slighty better on a cold day etc etc…..Thanks for explaining!!
it increases the mass flow
Ill apologise now for being a total lamen, is there a short way of explaining this :o……
Anything and everything that rolls along Bruntingthorpe’s runway!
Good Call !!!! especially from the LPG boys!!!
and also put in my request for Lusty Lindy to take flight from Elvington!!!!
:cool:What a brilliant Job…..she certainly does scrub up well, well done to all the team……cant wait to visit again in the spring!!!! I may even be granted permission for a Xmas visit. Thanks again for keeping all of us armchair fans up to speed!!!
On average at any given time there would be 64 useable Thors in the UK; one on each pad, plus a spare held at each Wing HQ. Transporting a missile from Wing HQ to a dispersed site took a day, add another day or so to mate it to the launch mount, program the RV and mate it to the missile, do the post-installation checks etc. Not a speedy reload by any means.
Great info….thanks for sharing!!
Although they were US controlled, Am I right in thinking that it was a “DUAL KEY” affair….as in if the US wanted a launch the UK would “In theory” have to agree….although If the US wanted a launch I would imagine they would have got one.
Also from my humble readings on THOR during the Cuban Missile Crisis. although on high alert, they were never at such a state of readiness as to be able to launch within a minutes notice, I believe it took quite a long time (hours) to prep one ready for a launch, and even then it only had a finite time at such a state of readiness due to the huge fuel losses etc etc…..Am I vaguely correct or were they actually ready to go during the crisis……..