dark light

ClanWarrior

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2261313
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    Too less pixels I would say, but looks like a Medium range Bomber/Missile Carrier.

    I never thought of that!

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2262090
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    Hmm… nothing much to say about this at moment.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]222816[/ATTACH]

    I don’t know what to make out of this design, hard to say if it is the J-20 (too long) or an other new design that the PLAAF are working on.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2262785
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    What role do you perceive for the J 20, I am thinking strike fighter or interceptor.

    I thought that the J-20 was some sort of Chinese Air Dominance Fighter, like how the F-22A was originally conceived.

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2265141
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    Forgive me, not the most accurate statement. I was referring to the DARPA HV-2 vehicle regarding mach 20 flight and the associated thermal challenges, not similar propulsion technology or program.

    The X-30 however had a lot of interesting work associated with air-breathing tech above mach 10 (various sources quote M17), thermal energy management. Interesting reads on the NASA technical reports server. Though it seems LM are thinking a different direction. Certainly there has been a lot of research in various directions my many civil/military tech branches.

    The most significant problem I see with going ‘too’ quick is flexibility and manoeuvrability, but going at those sort of speeds and corresponding altitudes would make it very difficult to intercept with anything conventional.

    Regarding your statement about ‘too’ quick is flexibility and maneuverability, the SR-71 took over 3 or 4 miles to make a turn at Mach 3, I suspect that “Kelly” Johnson was not making maneuverability highly important when he designed the SR-71 back in the 1960s and the Skunk Works could be making the same decisions with the SR-72.

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2265402
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    These factors have affected every aircraft and are solved. I agree in this instance the challenge is greater but the largest obstacle to this program I think is cost. Will cost vs capability provided actually be positive, it is very hard to comment at such an early stage.

    The IR signature, by present general knowledge, limits ‘stealth’. What if whether it is seen or not being irrelevant? Such as it having a all aspect laser defence system (that would probably cost a bit too) or targeting emp system? This craft will already be very exotic, these type of systems may go hand in hand. Who knows what defence systems have already had proven demonstrated concepts in the ‘black world’.

    Edit; additionally I think Mach 6 should be taken as a general idea, previous programs have demonstrated mach 20 capability.

    What aircraft programs are you referring to that can travel at mach 20?

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2266588
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    No.

    Simply no.

    At least, not in the way you mean rather than the way your technically writing. Heat soak might not be an issue, but a reduced IR signature certainly will be unobtainable. Its like trying to hide a meteor flying across the sky…

    Its not just the aircraft that gets hot… the air just in front of and beside the aircraft is compressed (and therefore heated) very rapidly, so the air itself gets extremely hot. This takes some time to dissipate and cool, and provides an even better target for detection and tracking systems than the skin of the aircraft does.

    Looks like Lockheed have a huge technical challenge on their hands between now and 2030. Which makes you think why did they come out and say that they are working on the SR-72 in the first place?

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2267122
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    there’s one little problem with hypersonic vehicles trying to be “discreet”: heat

    when you fly that fast, you litterally glow for any IR detector that can manage to get its line of sight on you. Today we have the F-35 promoters boasting about the EODAS that detects stuff 360° around the aircraft… by the time you get anything really hypersonic into operational service, there, most certainly, will be passive detection systems that will allow to have IR detectors, equipped with wide angle lenses watching the sky… and if you come at it so fast, and at such altitude, they’ll spot you from really very far away ( you’d appear over the horizon at about 700km, that is if they are on sea or flat ground… shoudlo the detector be put on some mountain, it’s even further)… that would give a good 4 minutes for detection and intercepting the supersonic flyer… short time in peace time, but if we’re on alert, it’s more than enough (should a modern SAM system be on your way).

    According to wikipedia (for what it’s worth) the S400 could go as high as 30km (pretty close to the 100000ft altitude) already, and intercept targets flying at 4.8km/s (which would be around Mach 17 ), and the S-500 is in the works

    basically, such aircraft would be useful (and probably be overkill most of the time), but would still have to avoid areas with strong modern SAM coverage (against the “serious” opponents, basically)

    You are right about heat being a major problem for hypersonic aircraft, but don’t you think that by the time that the SR-72 enters service around 2030 that Lockheed might have come up with a way to dissipate heat from the aircraft without compromising the aerodynamics?

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2267309
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    Anyone know the performance of the new S-500 SAM that Russia is working on? and whether that could catch the SR-72.

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2267380
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    This is a classic example of the novel ways that Defense Contractors come up with in this country to waste tax payers $$ .

    All these years we were told that STEALTH is the holy grail of penetrating enemy defenses .

    Eventually , the Pentagon & Defense Contractors have realized that this is no longer the case due to the proliferation of counter stealth technology ( primarily Russian) the world over .

    Now , we are being told that HYPERSONIC speed is the counter to counter stealth .

    I hope realization draws on these individuals that the S 300V and S 400 already have the capability of firing hypersonic surface to air missiles that can travel a lot faster than the SR 72 .

    Perhaps Lockheed will know this and combine Hypersonic speed (Mach 10+) and Stealth to the SR-72. Oh by the way I forgot to add altitude (100,000 ft+) to the equation.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2267959
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    There are more than sufficient EFs in service to cater to ‘UK air defence’. Also, since the Eurofighter’s production line is still going strong; the RAF could acquire more T3s to replace its Tornados, while operationalizing CFTs on the EF.

    On the downside, for starters, the industrial losses caused by exiting the JSF program will be heavy.

    Assuming (reasonably) that the UK isn’t ready to let go of its (currently non-existent) carrier strike capability, it would require an expensive adaptation of the HMS QE/PW for EMALS, not to mention the purchase of additional carrier capable aircraft – Rafale, (possibly ex-RAAF/USN) or Super Hornets or a genuine effort to navalize the Eurofighter (jury’s still out).

    Also, while the Taranis/Taranis-derivative would eventually pick up some of the slack in the strike department, the RAF/RN would most certainly be left with a SEAD capability far inferior to most of its peers.

    And Taranis or a derivative would certainly fit the bill if the UK Government ever decides to cancel the F-35B. There is a nagging thought about UCAVs and that is I don’t like them, but I suppose that is the price of progress.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2268137
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    What happens if the UK cancels the F-35B order outright? With no replacement being designed between now and say 2020 where would that leave the UK air defense? That by the way is the worst case scenario.

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2268777
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    What engine manufacturer would you all think would be best suited to powering the SR-72, Pratt & Whitney or General Electric? My bets are going onto P&W.

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2269946
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    The Aurora!

    We have all heard about the Aurora through the press reporting about the strange contrails in California in the late 1980s early 1990s, could the Aurora be an early flying testbed for this program or was it something else?

    in reply to: SR-72 revealed….. #2269994
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    Don’t get me started. I have heard it all before.

    in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2278272
    ClanWarrior
    Participant

    I think a dream would involve some MiG31EQ with R37s in Iraqi service! 😀

    Don’t think that would happen mate! The MiG-31 production line has been shut since the early 1990s. On that point, if Iraq wait’s a few years then they might want to order the successor to the MiG-31 sometime around 2020/2025.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 292 total)