Good luck with that. Rarer than hens teeth as far as I can tell. If you find more than one though please let me know 😀
It is odd why these are so rare yet they were just as commonly used as many other parts still easily found.
7 years old, 1984, Matchbox Hawker Tempest I got from Father Christmas. That fella has good taste.

There’s quite a few walkarounds online. This is good:
http://www.primeportal.net/hangar/mark_hayward/supermarine_s.6b_s1595/
It’s just a film and id rather watch many more of the same regular than wait 10 years for a film with real aeroplanes.
CGI is cheaper and can only get better with time.
The quality of the CGI has nothing to do with peoples complaints in these matters. There are ample examples of completely convincing CGI.
There are two threads on this very forum where forumites are convinced of some bad CGI, only for people in the ‘know’ to show up with proof they were indeed real or life size props.
What people are seeing and complaining about is what Producers and Directors want to do with CGI. I find it baffling that this does not seem to sink in.
If the film makers could get real aeroplanes to whizz around like x-wings they would absolutely have that happen.
I’m sure I’ve made this point before, but a great example is Flyboys. The visual effects company went to great lengths for accuracy (motion telemetry applied from an actual plane!) only to have that thrown out by the producer as it wasn’t exciting enough. That producer was also responsible for Independence Day. That should really tell you everything you need to know…
A Visual Effects breakdown of the movie here. No mention of the Lynx being a visual effect. A lot of talk about shooting for real and models with CGI helping.
As a miserable and nefarious CGI artist myself (one of many on this forum) this thread has been very entertaining and is bookmarked for future use. :p
In partial answer to the OP, the IMDB page has a huge list of contributing companies to the film. My guess is it’s one of the local (Czech) prop or special effect companies listed here.
http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0485985/companycredits
In fact my bet is they were made by the Barrandov Studios set and props crew. Ah, here we go, the full story here:
http://www.barrandov.cz/en/clanek/barrandov-studios-and-red-tails/
Where have I heard that before? :rolleyes:
Seriously, did the UK ever have a realistic (that is likely to be financed) manned space program planned?
My mistake. There was a manned spacecraft built but long since demolished and funded by a prominent US backer.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/4555455.stm
(there is an historic aviation related feature in the article, I swear!)
To be fair there seems to be renewed interest in government for the UK space program, including a nice logo. 😎
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_space_programme
Too little too late I imagine. There was a fairly upbeat documentary on BBC 4 a few months back on progress on Skylon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNtr1PuhlPI
Where have I heard that before? :rolleyes:
Seriously, did the UK ever have a realistic (that is likely to be financed) manned space program planned?
I don’t think Tony said anything about manned space flight, he was talking about a satellite launch system known as Black Arrow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Arrow
“As of 2011, the United Kingdom is the only country to have successfully developed and then abandoned a satellite launch capability.[26] All other countries that have developed such a capability have either retained it through their own space programme or, in the case of France, through its involvement in the Ariane programme.”
Much is made of the Tuskegee airmen but Joe Bloggs on the street might get the impression they were the only black or minority pilots that flew and fought for the allies. It’s an oversimplification that could be addressed. I know of quite a few people that feel they have only negative connections to British history and think they have no connection to the two world wars due to their race… if only they knew.
A quick Google brought up this interesting link. http://www.caribbeanaircrew-ww2.com/
Thanks guys. It’s looking more likely to be Lysander I guess.
I’ll see if I can get hold of anyone at Shuttleworth or try ARC at Duxford again. I don’t remember seeing this part but it was quite stripped back…
Odd that they highlighted the Rotodyne but not a mention of the SARO Princess.
Yes, I think that’s the case.
You’ve answered part of your own question; made by Aeroplastics; they do appear from time to time. I have one available if you are interested, but it wont plug straight in!
Bruce
As you say Bruce, it likely won’t plug in straight away.
How do Hurri and Spit seats compare? A quick look on Google suggest they don’t compare well. Why would that be if the differences were just mounting points?
No more confusion than already existed! There’s very little information on the seat. There’s no photos of it in good light and what you see here is the best we have to go on.
Funny what a tiny bit of digging will do. Guaranteed to only show up AFTER posting a question about it:
http://forum.largescaleplanes.com/index.php?showtopic=39906
The “plastic” seat first appeared in May,1940, and was always viewed as an alternative, not a replacement, though metal seats would have been few-and-far-between once Supermarine’s factory was destroyed in 1940. They stayed with the Spitfire right up to, and including, the 24, and, certainly, the Seafire 17. Post-war, they were rescued, and used in other airframes like the Provost, Vampire, Meteor and Hornet. They were produced by Aeroplastics Ltd., a Glasgow-based company, now defunct, though Tufnol (another Glasgow company) advertises a similar-sounding product. The seat was never made from Bakelite (may curses rain down on the Whitehall mandarin who used that name in a Spitfire manual,) nor Tufnol; it was always known, simply, as the “plastic seat.”
My bet would be the Whirly used a metal seat…