dark light

FBEDCOM

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boeing 747-800 delayed again! #516192
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    I remember Boeing doing sarcastic comments when Airbus announced some delays in the A380 test flights.

    Yes, I remember them too:

    http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archives/2005/01/the_a380_rolls_out.html

    Without question the A380 is a great engineering and industrial achievement. We congratulate Airbus on reaching this significant milestone. The people who designed it and put it together should be proud.

    http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archives/2007/10/big_delivery.html

    But regardless of our differences in philosophies, there’s no doubt that a tip of the hat is in order to Airbus on this milestone. We also salute Singapore Airlines, a great customer of ours and a leader in commercial aviation. Congratulations on a big delivery.

    Seriously though, I’d be interested to see the comments you infer, because I dont recall seeing such in public at least. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Boeing 747-800 delayed again! #516250
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    Here’s a couple of shots of the 747-8 line I took last week.

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #528583
    FBEDCOM
    Participant
    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #528593
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    Review of the Boeing second quarter earnings call can be located here too.

    I wonder how far back the 787 schedule will be when they reveal it later on this quarter.

    ANA sure has some patience threshold! πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: 787 First taxi w/ photos. #530926
    FBEDCOM
    Participant
    in reply to: Threat to VS jobs #532375
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    Heres you 2 free tickets and you’re P45 goodbye!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I feel really sorry for the staff who are going to lose their jobs and have been mislead By the egotistic SRB he can not be trusted whats so ever

    You may be onto something here – take a look at this commentary:

    http://www.glgroup.com/News/Virgin-Atlantic-Flirts-With-Jobs-Cull-41037.html

    No wonder VS is performing a “u-turn” so quickly after boasting about profits πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #534274
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    The money men seem inclined to disagree.

    I have the report in full if anyone is interested (although cant send to too many!)

    Actually, its my good colleague Heidi Wood who wrote that, and she’s obviously not a money man. Money woman perhaps πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #534296
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    Boeing officially announced another 2-3 month delay on first flight and subsequently deliveries.

    No they didnt.

    http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=720

    They gave no guidance at all. That is yet to follow. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Virgin Orders A330 #535383
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    I wouldnt be surprised if these replace the deferred A340-600’s VS no longer wanted.

    Cant be much of a net “gain” for either party except perhaps for engine makers.

    in reply to: Boeing optimistic on 787 first flight date! #551455
    FBEDCOM
    Participant
    in reply to: Need assistance from a Farsi speaker #553413
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    Email sent. 😎

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #568380
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    Twins lose half of their thrust when one engine fails. Quads lose only one quarter. True, twins have more powerful all-engine thrust to compensate for this; but there is a perception that twins do not compensate completely, and that they have worse performance in restricted, hot and high airports.

    Gotcha – thanks for the clarification.

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #569557
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    See
    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/02/27/323226/787-8-may-fail-to-meet-initial-specs-conesa.html

    Interestingly, it is said that

    Aeromexico flies 777-200ER.

    What would be the MTOW and range of 777-200LR out of Benito Juarez Airport? What about A340-600 (quads have better one-engine out behaviour, and Iberia flies them out of Mexico, as well as Quito where they crashed one), or A340-500HGW, or A380-800?

    More scandalous reporting from Flight, or should I say “Fright” Global:

    “Originally we were scheduled to receive the first one in 2010 and we were going to complete the transition [from 767s to 787s] in 2012,” he says. “With the new calendar we’ll probably complete the transition by 2014.”

    Aeromexico will not get 787’s anytime soon. Weight improvements from Line #20 are already in production and will (hopefully) not affect the 787’s they take delivery of later. So why they are “worried” is strange – its not as if they’re gonna take delivery of the first few heavier 787-8’s anyway. Weight improvements happen continuously through every airplane’s life…

    Only the first 19 787’s will have to be retro-fitted with weight improvement packages – very disingenuous of “Fright Global” to have left that out of its article.

    777-200LR is too large for AM’s needs (as the article states), however, with a lower seat count, it could probably do MEX-“Somewhere in Asia” handsomely.

    Could you please expand on this chornedsnorkack?

    …quads have better one-engine out behaviour…

    in reply to: 777-200LRF delivered! #571985
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    On the subject of twin engine freighters, Aviation Week has a good article on the Airbus’ plans for its freighter line-up.

    Link

    in reply to: New Boeing 787 Images #571987
    FBEDCOM
    Participant

    Just out of interest, FBEDCOM, do you plan to actually take part in the discussions on this site or do you just intend to post links to your own blog?

    GA

    Yes I will, but at present I dont have time to do that (due to other commitments). But rest assured, yes I fully intend to participate hence my joining this site.

    I think its one of the best sites for aviation material I an certainly enjoy reading the swathe of threads/details it has πŸ™‚

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)