I’m looking forward for the FC-1 PT04 to takeoff.
Seems like a waste of money to write it off.
That’s a fixable problem it seems to me.
After looking and pictures of Iranian F-4’s that were returned service during the war with Iraq I don’t see why this bird can’t be fixed.
If its not repairable for it to go back to service.
Just repair it, so it looks visually ok and place it in a museum. Best option for this costly plane.
A guy named “x” posted this at CMF
Nice new J-10 pic, Huitong says the serial number is 10642 (#62).
I wish there was a J-10 pic in PLAN colours.
Didn’t even know that there were Nepali negotiations for Z-9s but it seems there’ve been recent interest in the craft. It probably undercuts the original Dauphin by a good margin.
If Nepal cannot afford, China should not sell the Z-9A choppers, but proceed with the 3 MA-60 planes deal. In return, China can donate its Z-5 choppers to them.
Y-9 shown in Dubai
Nice J-11, it looks like an indigenous J-11X Super Flanker. Single-seat, front canards, Su-30MKK style tailfins, and armed with a pack of indigenous SD-10 BVRAAMs, Russian R-77 BVRAAMs and R-73 WVRAAMs. Not sure if its YJ-91 or Kh-31?
I’m curious myself, why the Indians are taking a long time to decide what fighter they want? I mean its been going for years now and so far no progress ie. short-list etc.
But I have a feeling its either going to be a US or Russian plane. ie. either a F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, F-16 or MiG-35.
This is BS. Kanwa is not a fully reliable source. Half is true and the other half are stories from dreamland.
China’s top priority is still with the J-10. The FC-1 is nothing, but to which China maybe only acquired a limited number (e.g. up to 100) of them to promote export sales.
It is only confirm China will buy 100 RD-93, the Russian manufacturer speculates China will buy 500.
I doubt China will buy 500, if Russia doesn’t allow China to export FC-1s fitted with a RD-93 to a third country like Pakistan or any country where China and Russia are competing to sell their planes.
I supposed the report in the Kilo class page of sinodefence means 7 as well.
Oh well doesn’t matter what the figure is, all we know is that we’ll have all 8 Type 636Ms by the end of next year as a conservative estimate.
I thought all the 636Ms were supposed to be delivered by the end of this year.
Yes, it appears to be an error now, firstly what I heard throughout the year it seems like only 2 were delivered (that is confirmed).
Now there’s conflicting reports, even sinodefence website is unclear. Its says 5 have been delivered, then later mentions 7 have been, with the last remaining Type 636M to be delivered by the end of next year (Sinodefence says by mid-2006).
??? I’m confused ???
Quote: This year the PLA navy has already received seven of the eight Kilo class submarines and one of the two Sovremenny class destroyers it ordered from Russia in 2002.
http://www.sinodefence.com/news/2005/news05-12-29.asp
Quote: In 2002 the PLA Navy ordered an additional eight Project 636M submarines worth US$2 billion. By December 2005 the PLA Navy had already received five of the eight submarines ordered. The last unit is scheduled to be delivered by the end of 2006.
PLAN vessel numbers in end of 2005
Destroyers (DDG)
2 x Type 052C Luyang II class
2 x Type 052B Luyang class
2 x Type 956 Sovremenny class
1 x Type 956EM Sovremenny class
1 x Type 051B Luhai class
2 x Type 052 Luhu class
16 x Type 051/G Luda class
TOTAL DDG = 24
Frigates (FFG)
2 x Type 054 Jiangkai class
14 x Type 053H3 Jiangwei I/II/III class
32 x Type 053 Jianghu I/III/V class
TOTAL FFG = 48
Conventional Submarines (SSK)
2 to 3 x Type 041 Yuan class
2 x Type 877EKM Kilo class
2 x Type 636 Kilo class
2 x Type 636M Kilo class
Between 10 to 14 x Type 039/G Song class
17 x Type 035E/F Ming class
TOTAL SSK = Up to 40
Nuclear Submarines (SSN)
1 or 2 Type 093 class
5 Type 091 Han class
Nuclear Submarines (SSBN)
1 Type 094 class
1 Type 092 class
TOTAL SSN & SSBN = Up to 9
Under Development (Acknowledged)
1 x Aircraft Carrier (Vargay)?
2 x Type 051C class DDG
1 x Type 956EM Sovremenny class DDG
1 x Type 054A class FFG (or more?)
6 x Type 636M Kilo class SSK
More Yuan and Song class SSKs?
PLAN Airpower in end of 2005
24 x Su-30MKK2 fighter-bombers
10 x JH-7A fighter-bombers
19 x JH-7 Block 02 fighter-bombers
18 x JH-7 Block 01 fighter-bombers
100 x J-8B/D fighters
120 x J-7EH fighters (Navy’s J-7E)
?? x H-6D/M
Where you guys get the J-10 models? I went in HK everywhere and couldn’t find them. But when I was in Beijing, I found ready big and heavy ones but cost a fortunate.
I’m in Australia, and there’s definitely none. Tell where can I found them in HK?
CHINESE INTEREST IN Su-33
Chinese interest in aircraft carriers has entered an active phase, and a Chinese delegation visited MAKS’2005 to carefully study all the necessary technologies. A presentation of the Su-33 and Su- 27KUB (Su-33UB) shipborne fighters was specially arranged for the Chinese party, including a late-evening Su-27KUB demonstration flight during the show. The Su27KUB, which was not included in the official list of aircraft on display, was only present at MAKS for half a day. It was brought from Saki, Ukraine, where it is being tested, specifically for the purpose of being presented to the Chinese delegation.
At the beginning of August, before the MAKS exhibition, a Chinese delegation visited St Petersburg, where it listened to presentations by representatives of the Nevskoye PKB ship design bureau, the designer of Russian aircraft carriers, as well as to other companies cooperating with Nevskoye PKB. The Chinese also examined aircraft carrier equipment, including automatic landing systems and arresting devices. The Chinese probably visited also the Ukrainian shipyard in Mykolayiv, which has built all Soviet aircraft carries, including the Admiral Kuznetsov and Varyag.
The Russians have submitted a three-stage proposal with various dates of delivery for selling Su-33 shipborne fighters:
– present version of Su-33 as used by the Russian Navy, armed only with air-to-air missiles and intended for fleet air defence;
– modernised Su-33M version with avionics and weapons similar to that of Su-30MK2 shore-based fighters operated by the Chinese Navy, including Kh-31A antiship missiles;
– future advanced version of multirole shipborne fighter similar to the shore-based Su-35 fighter presently under development.
For the time being, the two-seat shipborne Su-27KUB is considered by the Chinese as a training aircraft only.
————————————————————————
This case it is highly likely that China will try and obtain the Su-33M (based on the Su-30MKK2) for its carrier fighter jets.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/294831/russian_industry_shows_its_stuff/
If the Varyag becomes the PLAN’s carrier, China would definitely select the Su-33 as its primary carrier fighters. Russia may offer China a exclusive modified version maybe designated as Su-33MKK (with single or twin seat variants), anti-shipping role is expected.
But China would need a lot of Submarines, and some FFGs with VLS platforms to defend it.
Does anyone have a URL link to video of the F-35 flights? (in WMV format)
I saw the F/A-22 one, it was so cool. Better than the Su-37 flight performance.