@TR1 cockpit is a bit different. Check the section with dials adjacent to the port panel, left to the fuel indicators, afterburner indicators, etc. Moving the LCD up was probably due to better visibility.

Hunt is a wrong word, since NATO doesn’t intent forcing a VMF submarine to surface, or sink one for that matter.

@garryA, have fun with detection/jam of PDUs that each reside on a different carrier segment while you don’t know the a) initial seed b) sequence number.

You have argued that a fighter’s RWR can detect and triangulate data links between S-300 parts. Now you’re speaking of barrage jamming, are you serious? You are running around your point because it’s moot. We weren’t talking about jamming the said data link, we were talking about detecting the presence and location of S-300 system by means of interlink detection. If you don’t have ELINT, something that can fly close and over the said data links, you won’t detect them, simple as that. Which would be a one way trip for the ELINT crew. You may paste at least seven more SD card pictures, you’ve wrote yourself ‘you don’t know how RWR works’, then how can you claim one’s features?

Given that those UAV has to transmit recorded video of enomous size (30 hours record would mean several TB of information at the very least) , it isn’t much of a surprise that there is a lag

Are you suggesting that ‘lag’ in digital communications depends on the definite size of data to be transferred?
Latency has nothing to do with either bandwidth or transfer size.

Then technically I should be able to pick up said datalink via my grandma’s radio receiver. Cause it’s all electronic signals, right?

Thanks.

Cause they didn’t do stripped down variants of either of those. The P-42 had so much avionics removed that its T:W was coming close to 2.

Was? Isn’t it deployed on Slava class cruisers?