We dont really. I think there was some news previous year they will introduce it this year but it has been “next year” for the past 3-4 years. RVV-BD numbers are for export, real range is longer. And i rechecked, MiG-31M record was done in August of 1993 and the drone was shot down at distance of 228km while it was being tracked from 319km out.
I have different numbers in my head and my sources are books, either PiBu or Red Star one, I’ll have to double-check.
Don’t forget that R-33S and Zaslon-A were made because of Tolkachev’s defection. They were rushed into production, also. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was many (as in hundreds) of them.
Berkut, do we know details about RVV-BD trials / introduction date? AFAIR it was marketed as LR-AAM option for (then called) Su-35BM in it’s export brochures. I guess some of it might be public.
R-33S is more than enough until then. It’s got 230 km of theoretical range. R-37 1994 test was 280 km. But Su-30 took over at some point because SBI-16M wasn’t fully operational.
The original R-37 beat that record in early 90’s. 228 km iirc.
As far as I recall, that was R-33S, upgraded variant that was forced into production after Tolkachev’s case came up. R-37 had a test in 1994 where mid-course updates were provided by Su-30 flying around the middle of the path between MiG-31M and target drone. Zaslon-M wasn’t obviously fully ready.
Mach 1.83 is the standard supersonic cruise speed of MiG-31
Modern CPUs are in no other way programmed than legacy ones. Each runs on it’s instruction set with clear reflection in appropriate assembly syntax. You may use a higher level language compiler but that doesn’t mean modern military CPUs run Ada.
Your remarks about integer and otherwise number precision are correct. Apart from that, it’s just that CPUs today have multiplied FPU and I/O performance per watt by many times.
Curious reference to “Su-35/35S” for 2013 tests. Can anyone explain differentiation between 35 and 35S here? Perhaps VVS production models are a bit different than KnAAZ prototypes.
The post seems like automatic translation from Chinese to English.
The K-100 have about 200km range, it is not known if it reached service or if it has been canceled.
The Ks-172 is nothing more than a fantasy missile, show me one official link that this weapon exist.
R-33S killed a thing ~ 230 km distance.
We heard all the same drivel about the FSW Flanker that Sukhoi made a decade or so ago and nothing came of it. Don’t get your hopes up. 🙂
Sukhoi never made any claims of that sort, regarding S-37.
Journalists write their own bull****, you can’t expect Sukhoi / VVS / anyone to stop them.
Berkut was a tech demonstrator, it receieved initial funding for tech demonstrator, not for 5th gen prototype R&D. Sukhoi “tried” to sell it in ’90s because of funding shortage, they never seriously approached any foreign country and they knew VVS is not going to buy them. So it was a more of “what the hell, nothing to lose” kind of try than something serious.
BTW, T-50 is not stealth right now, not because of your damned compressor blades, but because of all the test gear hooked onto it. No, Sukhoi doesn’t know that compressors have a huge RCS and can be used as identification pattern. Why don’t you send them an email?
Aha. So “3D TVC” has nozzles moving in two dimensions, that enable the engine to direct platform forwards in any of three dimensions. That would seem logical. On the other hand, TVC means thrust vector control, and if you take X as thrust vector, all jet/rocket engines become “TVC”. X vector is controlled solely by engine power, with nozzle always standing at 0 deg Y and Z.
Semantics 🙂
Why is single-axis vector thruster called 2D, and dual axis 3D? Looks like they both have one surplus dimension in naming 😉
Eg, for in-service aircraft; F-22 and Su-30MKI have TVC, while Su-35S has 2D TVC.
@Privateer454, don’t bother with this Steve guy. He has absolutely no idea about the subject, classic troll.
Even got to sit in MiG-31BM cockpit…;) Yes, i have pic of front cockpit, but none of the back, but i did take a peek of how it looked…
Post those images, please.
Original MiG-29’s BVR doctrine was still tied to GCI that would give directions where to look and where to shoot. Inside WVR, it reduced pilot’s workload via SCHLEM and R-73 cueuing.
I’m also quite curious about this “everbody has nukes” concept.