dark light

Dr Somnath999

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 38 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2269972
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    SOME INFO

    At 7:00, they say that aircraft of the 4.5th gen show up on radar the size of a football while PAKFA’s RCS is that of a tennis ball

    CHEERS

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2270972
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    You’re saying that, and you’re a “Moderator” on the Indian Defence Forum? Which features the Princess of Trolls – Sampaix/Gegene/Fonk/Dare2/DragonMaster/Dragonfly, widely known in Aviation Forums the world over…

    You need to think about that.

    LOLLZZ

    here comes a homo sapien lecturing me about moderation meanwhile who himself resort to PA/ insults against a person who
    has been banned previously for pulling of pants down of some
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2082511#post2082511

    http://www.indiandefence.com/forums/indian-air-force/22158-eurofighter-typhoon-v-s-dassault-rafale-analysis-786.html

    plz do me & this forum a favour dont waste my & readers of this forum’s time by quoting my posts
    BTW i am not a moderator of that forum , rather join that forum if u have guts to debate

    CHEERS

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2271353
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    I came here on PAKFA thread hopping to see more knowledgeble members discussing T50-5 but instead people have allowed themselves to be derailed on the last 3 pages by Scooter and other trolls.the last 2 posts seem to have got us back on track and can we please keep it that way after all T50-5 has just come out.More discussion of T50- 5 pics please

    thanks

    But people are here are more bothered to pamper their egos about their knowledge rather than spreading knowledge.

    the forum need quality posts member not higher number of posts members

    here are some pics to share

    A 3/4 look, a new PChN (LEVCon) mounts are clearly visible:
    http://paralay.iboards.ru/download/file.php?style=12&id=16606&mode=view

    SOME STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS ALSO

    http://s1.directupload.net/images/131029/ixui4hvp.jpg

    http://s14.directupload.net/images/131029/rva8wfcs.jpg

    CHEERS

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2271435
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Strangely comparing the 4th protype with 5th protype

    2 things again reappear

    1st is 101KS-O (defensive countermeasures station against infrared homing missiles)

    2nd is 101KS-U all-round awareness system (roughly saying, Russian counterpart of the F-35’s Distributed Aperture System (DAS) ). Threat detection, acquisition and targeting.

    3rd 101-KS U MAWS On the fuselage sides of the t-50-4, dissappeared again (lol)

    here compare those 2 pics again

    5TH PROTOTYPE
    http://s14.directupload.net/images/131029/n5i8ml4d.jpg

    4TH PROTOYPE
    http://nrg.at.tut.by/T-50-4/9s.jpg

    CHEERS

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2273210
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    final product. there are five production models in active service with the Russian marines and one being built for the navy aviation. Because of the French deal with Mistral, the Pak-fa can also shoot MICA missiles, one of which was credited for a kill in the Georgian war.

    WTF
    how does that relate to pak-fa shooting mica

    if thats the case then why not IAF use meteor on FFGA

    CHEERS

    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Sure, the Typhoon brings many of the same things to the table in that it is fast and agile. Its speed and stealth would be somewhat less than a PAK FA, but with Meteor it has a far more deadly missile that would present a major threat to both any high value target as well as any escorting fighters.

    Blah di blah!!!!

    may be you have swallowed up this marketing ad from typhoon consortium group :dev2:
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-D-7W6QUPkJA/TtZCKsvbGlI/AAAAAAAAORo/JKaav-uD4-g/s1600/111.JPG

    Hmm!!
    let me guess

    “fast & Agile”

    Hmm!! on one hand you are claiming it is going to be fast as pak-fa & on the other hand you are claiming it’s speed going to be less as compare to Pak-fa
    now WTF does that mean .?? :stupid:

    tell u what pakfa protypes now are tested with stage 1engine of the 117 variant that too boast of having achieving Mach 1.5 supercruise speed when the stage 2 variant of 117 engine is replaced which is going to be it’s real engine which is touted to be even more powerful than stage 1 variant
    then u can guess what would be it’s supercruise speed when pak-fa gets it’s real engine

    Agility
    another remarkable assumption by you i must say

    A plane which is not having all these characteristics is called as agile against a plane which is having all these features

    * 3D TVC
    * Full moveable LERX
    * Full moveable vertical and horizontal stabilizers
    * higher T/W ratio if new engines are installed
    * much higher climb rate

    GEEZ!!

    strange thing is i thought Pak-fa is going to be more maneuvarable than F22 as it had compromised stealth to be more maneuvable than F22

    I was a wrong then :eagerness:

    Meteor missille

    it is an incredible missile indeed ,DOnt worry i wont argue about BVR missile usefulness like others even though that is very important factor that too against a stealth plane that would be even more hopeless but i wont drag it in here .

    But it has got nothing to do with typhoon even Rafale would be greater threat than typhoon as it can cue it’s Meteor missile
    with spectra alone without turning on it’s aesa radar for stealth reason which Typhoon cannot with DASS..Becoz turning on your aesa radar against F22 is going to be a suicide for the pilot as F22’s ALR 94 system would detect it radio emssion & not only that it would cue it’s BVRAAM with it without turning on it’s own aesa radar for stealth reasons.

    allright u must be knowing the Russians had scrapped their ramjet powered BVRAAM but the fact is we dont know yet Pak-fa’s real weapons as the russians have yet to reveal it’s weapons.

    Here is an interesting news which i had posted in Pak-fa thread

    One aspect of the T-50 program is to create on-board weapons within schedule and budget funding. August 28, General Director of “Tactical Missiles Corporation” (Tactical Missiles Corporation) Boris Obnosov spoke about the modernization of the existing and development of new-generation aircraft armament. Portages made a pretentious statement that creates new air combat missiles, whose characteristics will be better UR Meteor develop a European company MBDA. However, Obnosov states that all samples of airborne weapons, created as part of the T-50, will also be included in the nomenclature of weapons of Su-35.
    http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.co.in&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://vpk.name/news/96030_maks2013_perspektivyi_t50_sopryazhenyi_s_sereznyimi_problemami.html&usg=ALkJrhg2d_gT45QVQVr6gxC-4nGoAO62Ag

    May be Russians indeed agree with your POV about meteor missile & are taking these into account for developing future air to air missiles for PAK-FA.

    CHEERS

    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Certainly, I just don’t get the fascination with the size of the PAK FA or its missiles. A Eurofighter with Meteor presents a similar and arguably greater threat.

    Can you Plz care to explain that part & how??

    well then we should rather buy typhoon rather PAK-FA.:highly_amused:

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2249980
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    The F-22 uses other embedded sensors/antennas and systems to perform EW and other tasks..

    http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/7968/1m8w.png

    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/docs/n19991027_991994.htm

    BAE Systems Delivers F-22 Digital Electronic Warfare System

    http://www.spacewar.com/reports/BAE_Systems_Delivers_F_22_Digital_Electronic_Warfare_System.html

    I know it uses other systems for Jamming but not ALR 94 system for sure

    why i asked that becoz the source which Jo posted mentions both EW & siginit aspect in relation to ALR 94 system

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2249986
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Intimations of AN/ALR-94?

    Further details:

    *With reference to the Su-35S, then I don’t think this refers to DFRM as they already have the wingtip mounted SAP-518 or podded MSK-418K for that role, this appears more suited for SIGINT. I recommend google translating that link as other developments sound very interesting too.

    Interesting info JO

    but ALR -94 is RWR not used for Jamming

    Can u post some info about SU 35 ‘s RWR

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2250060
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Really? I don’t see internationally recognised ‘Danger Radiation’ markings on the SAP 518 or even the monster SAP-14. Your microwave oven must be Norway’s best kept military secret!

    No, they’re more to do with embedded arrays for RLG navigation, comms, etc. and the associated fibre optic network.

    Yes, but it ISN’T A RADAR, IS IT?!!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]220502[/ATTACH]
    As for the tail stinger, so what happens, God forbid, a threat emerges in the forward sector? Does the pilot fly backwards?!

    Hi JO

    Jo whats the specific use of having L Band antennae which is basically more to do with IFF than radar itself

    can it effective against VLO targets if used in conjuction with X band aesa radar?

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2251257
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    MAKS-2013. Prospects for T-50 are associated with serious problems?

    http://vpk.name/file/img/3_pak_fa_260813.t.jpg

    Demonstration of the fifth-generation fighter T-50 (PAKFA) at the Moscow air show MAKS-2013 showed that Russia has problems with adopting new front-line fighters the Air Force, writes janes.com August 29.

    On the opening day on August 27 with the participation of the Prime Minister of Russia Dmitry Medvedev planned to carry out the flight of all four instances of flight T-50, but the show was attended by only three cars. Analysts of the Russian aerospace industry and related structures of note that there are several obstacles that the T-50 must be overcome before it will be considered as a viable design, ready for serial production.

    As technology demonstrator of the Su-47 (1990) T-50 should be an example of Russian industrial opportunities for the production of composite structures on a large scale and at a reasonable price. Nevertheless, more than 15 years, composite panels and other components of nodes T 50 are still made in “manual mode”. In order to bring the aircraft to a series, the production base factory in Komsomolsk-on-Amur (KNAAPO) needs substantial investment in modernizing equipment.

    Today, T-50 flies on the same turbofan design 117S/AL-41F “Saturn” / KB them. Cradles, which are on the Su-35. This engine was developed in the late 1980s for the program 1.42 (IFIs) in size. Mikoyan, which was canceled. The development teams of “Salute” working on a new turbofan ed. 127/217 state that they have created a “concept and the core of the new engine.” An unnamed Russian military analyst at the Moscow Research Center reported INS Jane’s, that “will take several years to understand the design and build a new engine.”

    Meanwhile, the third of the four prototypes of the T-50 is equipped with a new radar NO50 with active electronically scanned array (AESA) NIIP design (Scientific Research Institute of Instrument. Tikhomirov – approx. “VP”), which, according to representatives of some of the participating electronic companies, “in a test flight showed very encouraging and impressive results.” The dilemma is that the receiving and transmitting modules (APMs) for radar produced no commercial firm, as in the case of the radar “Zhuk-MA” AFAR, and on the research and production center “Source”, which produced microwaves and other technologies to Soviet weapons systems. “Source” is not able to produce antipersonnel mines in production scale, making them unprofitable in the current scheme of production, “the experts say.

    In addition, the aircraft has not yet completed a full test program to validate the flight characteristics. There are a number of maneuvers for which algorithms control systems still need to be developed and validated.

    One aspect of the T-50 program is to create on-board weapons within schedule and budget funding. August 28, General Director of “Tactical Missiles Corporation” (Tactical Missiles Corporation) Boris Obnosov spoke about the modernization of the existing and development of new-generation aircraft armament. Portages made a pretentious statement that creates new air combat missiles, whose characteristics will be better UR Meteor develop a European company MBDA.:highly_amused: However, Obnosov states that all samples of airborne weapons, created as part of the T-50, will also be included in the nomenclature of weapons of Su-35. Against this background, many Russian analysts expect that the Su-35 will be produced in larger quantities than planned, and will be the basis of Russian Air Force fighter aircraft, if enacting the T-50 will move away due to technical problems.

    The leaders of the United Aircraft Corporation and the “dry” earlier promised President Vladimir Putin that the T-50 will be ready for commissioning by 2015. “It seems that there is no chance to survive this schedule, therefore, the price of the aircraft is expected to grow as a delay are taken into account in the overall cost of the program,” said one analyst.

    MAKS-2013 was the first exhibition, which since his election to the presidency in 2000, Putin was absent. There are indications that it is a problem with the T-50 made a “contribution” in his decision not to attend the air show on the opening day.

    http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.co.in&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://vpk.name/news/96030_maks2013_perspektivyi_t50_sopryazhenyi_s_sereznyimi_problemami.html&usg=ALkJrhg2d_gT45QVQVr6gxC-4nGoAO62Ag

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2251308
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Oh for crying out loud…

    ok

    best thing is to press Pause button on this issue , rather wait for weapon trials in Pak-fa protype like J20 weapon trials .

    I hope everything would be clear by then

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2251312
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    http://i.imgur.com/T8dYLPR.jpg

    LOLLZ

    why dont u post this pic instead that looks more realistic:D
    http://i.imgur.com/XH5IISC.jpg

    I wonder why russians are building foldable fins R 77 variants if 1 missile is going to be fit in 1 weapon bay

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2251331
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    For the third time: at present there are TWO launchers in each bay. That is TWO in the front bay and TWO in the aft bay. That means 2+2 = FOUR launchers and consequently, FOUR missiles in total. Not 3+3, 4+4 or 10432+10432.

    Third-party 3D models and Photoshopped schematics do not change this fact. Future prospects is a different story, but wild speculation isn’t very popular in this neighbourhood.

    Excuse me

    i think PAK-FA has 4 bays in center fuselarge plz correct me if i am wrong, so if there are 2 launchers in each bay then how would Pak-fa have 4 missiles in total it would be 8 then?

    CHEERS.

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2251340
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Somnath, there have been pages after pages of exhaustive discussions about the things you posted. If you do an image search of any of the images you have uploaded, they will all lead back to here, type any keyword related to any aviation program, it will lead back to here. This thread, is in some ways, is running ahead of mainstream news. Some posters have a track record of being correct regarding further developments, spend some time on the board and you’ll realise who’s who. Restarting discussions on material already dismissed as trivial might not get the response you expected.

    HI
    TWINBLADE

    good to see u here also old pal.

    I am not here to restart dead topics but i have asked some questions to a particular member only ,May be i should have PMed him about my queries that should have been right .

    Sorry for the inconvience to everyone on my side though

    CHEERS

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 38 total)