Dr Somnath999!! lolol you wish there is that many missile inside
but really only 2 in a bay. thats it!
but if you want you can draw 8 in a bay too.
thats what i am asking how many per bay??
but the problem is people here are confusing that 3+3 or 4+4 combination that i am asking for each weapon bay thats not what i am saying.even a blind man can say it is impossible to carry 3 missiles in each bay:highly_amused:
I am saying that combination 3 or 4 is for both the weapons bays in front fuselarge & 3 or 4 for both the weapon bays in rear fuselarge like these pic
see below it’s PSED pic
For 3 + 3 weapon loadout
![]()
FOR 4+4 WEAPON LOADOUT

CHEERS
The Indian PAK FA will therefore be distinctly different in external appearance since its airframe skin, inclusive of the canards & tailfins, will all be built of radar-absorbent composites-based materials similar to what they have been doing with their LCA MK I .
that absolute B.S
why would we want canards in Pak-fa like su 30 mki
india wants at best 2 seater variant of Pak-Fa which would have certain composite intake enhancements , indigenoius software & imported european or isreali avionics suite
CHEERS
I don’t whine, and i post plenty of information. All you have posted are retarded pictures. Any questions?
then plz be kind of enough to post such plenty of informations that too in a civil manner.
i dont post retarded pics , if a retard cant understand the pics then it becomes a retarded pics , Strange.!!:eagerness:
CHEERS
This poster is a certified troll and needs to be banned as well.
Rofl mao:D
is posting article which goes against the american superpower might = trolling
GEEZ!!
There are four UVKU launch units in the two bays, meaning four missiles up to the size of the Kh-58UShKE. There is arguably space for a 3+3 loadout of something like fin-folded RVV-AE, but no solid indications of any rail system able to accomodate this at present.
Hi
sadly there is no pic yet
which shows four UVKU launch units in the two bays .
I would be grateful to you if you kindly post a source which says four UVKU launch units in the two bays
CHEERS
Why stop there? Why not 5+5 while we are at it? Or 101+101? That should do the trick.
Stop whining rather post something constructive !


http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/Ruskie_Jet-New-.pdf
CHEERS
@ Jo Asakura
few questions
1) whats the news about OLS 50 IRST which is going to be placed in PAK-FA in future ?
2) what’s the possible missile weapon loadout in PAK -FA center fuselarge would it be
3+ 3 combination of 6 bvraam or 4+4 combination of 8 bvaams ?
3) Do u think L band + X band aesa radar would be effective against VLO platforms?
4) whats the news about PAK-FA RWR antennas , would it be comparable to F22’s ALR -94 system ??
CHEERS
Here’s a GaAs AESA that went largely unnoticed. This company also supply the T/R modules for the T-50’s N036:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]220361[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]220362[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]220363[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]220364[/ATTACH]
1st pic is ‘NPP Istok’s’ array, 2nd their T/R module. The 3rd pic is Tomsk NIIPP’s (Томский НИИПП) GaN MMIC & LTCC substrate for Phazotron-NIIRs 3D radar (4th pic). Flight tests for the latter are planned to commence in 2014, and development of the array embedded in a polymer composite laminate will be undertaken 2014-15.
It is only now, after nearly a decade that sufficient funding became available for programme implementation, that the fruits of those investments are beginning to be glimpsed and, clearly, the Russians have come a long way from ‘Bars’, ‘Irbis-E’ and even ‘Zhuk-AE’.
HI JO
glad i could post my 1st post in this forum after activation 😀
I closely follow your posts regarding PAK-FA
& your info about composite blades for PAK-fa engine was one of my favourites.
are those GaN MMIC elements which u posted above would be used in pak-fa radar complex.
BTW many PAK-FA critics say PAK-FA ‘s rcs is around 0.5 m2 & posted some ridiculous pics to say it’s not stealthy

what’s your view??
CHEERS