dark light

Dr Somnath999

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 31 through 38 (of 38 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2251352
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Dr Somnath999!! lolol you wish there is that many missile inside
    but really only 2 in a bay. thats it!
    but if you want you can draw 8 in a bay too.

    thats what i am asking how many per bay??

    but the problem is people here are confusing that 3+3 or 4+4 combination that i am asking for each weapon bay thats not what i am saying.even a blind man can say it is impossible to carry 3 missiles in each bay:highly_amused:

    I am saying that combination 3 or 4 is for both the weapons bays in front fuselarge & 3 or 4 for both the weapon bays in rear fuselarge like these pic
    see below it’s PSED pic

    For 3 + 3 weapon loadout

    http://lh3.ggpht.com/-aFkewsgd-44/UBJViw05VZI/AAAAAAAAFt0/nVf6Pp8VIZE/T-50-PAK-FA-Fifth-Generation-Fighter-Aircraft-FGFA-02_thumb%25255B1%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800

    FOR 4+4 WEAPON LOADOUT

    http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i441/somnath30/PAK-FAEXTINTRWEAPONPAYLOAD.jpg

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2252311
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    The Indian PAK FA will therefore be distinctly different in external appearance since its airframe skin, inclusive of the canards & tailfins, will all be built of radar-absorbent composites-based materials similar to what they have been doing with their LCA MK I .

    that absolute B.S

    why would we want canards in Pak-fa like su 30 mki

    india wants at best 2 seater variant of Pak-Fa which would have certain composite intake enhancements , indigenoius software & imported european or isreali avionics suite

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2252314
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    I don’t whine, and i post plenty of information. All you have posted are retarded pictures. Any questions?

    then plz be kind of enough to post such plenty of informations that too in a civil manner.

    i dont post retarded pics , if a retard cant understand the pics then it becomes a retarded pics , Strange.!!:eagerness:

    CHEERS

    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    This poster is a certified troll and needs to be banned as well.

    Rofl mao:D

    is posting article which goes against the american superpower might = trolling

    GEEZ!!

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2252469
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    There are four UVKU launch units in the two bays, meaning four missiles up to the size of the Kh-58UShKE. There is arguably space for a 3+3 loadout of something like fin-folded RVV-AE, but no solid indications of any rail system able to accomodate this at present.

    Hi

    sadly there is no pic yet
    which shows four UVKU launch units in the two bays .

    I would be grateful to you if you kindly post a source which says four UVKU launch units in the two bays

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2252472
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Why stop there? Why not 5+5 while we are at it? Or 101+101? That should do the trick.

    Stop whining rather post something constructive !

    http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i441/somnath30/PAKFAWEAPONLOADOUT-1.jpg

    http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i441/somnath30/PAK-FAEXTINTRWEAPONPAYLOAD.jpg

    http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/Ruskie_Jet-New-.pdf

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2252551
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    @ Jo Asakura

    few questions

    1) whats the news about OLS 50 IRST which is going to be placed in PAK-FA in future ?

    2) what’s the possible missile weapon loadout in PAK -FA center fuselarge would it be
    3+ 3 combination of 6 bvraam or 4+4 combination of 8 bvaams ?

    3) Do u think L band + X band aesa radar would be effective against VLO platforms?

    4) whats the news about PAK-FA RWR antennas , would it be comparable to F22’s ALR -94 system ??

    CHEERS

    in reply to: PAK-FA thread about information, pics, debate ⅩⅩⅢ #2252554
    Dr Somnath999
    Participant

    Here’s a GaAs AESA that went largely unnoticed. This company also supply the T/R modules for the T-50’s N036:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]220361[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]220362[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]220363[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]220364[/ATTACH]

    1st pic is ‘NPP Istok’s’ array, 2nd their T/R module. The 3rd pic is Tomsk NIIPP’s (Томский НИИПП) GaN MMIC & LTCC substrate for Phazotron-NIIRs 3D radar (4th pic). Flight tests for the latter are planned to commence in 2014, and development of the array embedded in a polymer composite laminate will be undertaken 2014-15.

    It is only now, after nearly a decade that sufficient funding became available for programme implementation, that the fruits of those investments are beginning to be glimpsed and, clearly, the Russians have come a long way from ‘Bars’, ‘Irbis-E’ and even ‘Zhuk-AE’.

    HI JO

    glad i could post my 1st post in this forum after activation 😀

    I closely follow your posts regarding PAK-FA

    & your info about composite blades for PAK-fa engine was one of my favourites.

    are those GaN MMIC elements which u posted above would be used in pak-fa radar complex.

    BTW many PAK-FA critics say PAK-FA ‘s rcs is around 0.5 m2 & posted some ridiculous pics to say it’s not stealthy

    http://i.imgur.com/Xs31G.jpg

    what’s your view??

    CHEERS

Viewing 8 posts - 31 through 38 (of 38 total)