I wouldn’t put too much hopes on the MAKO being competitive any time soon.. the UAE has lost interest in it, the Luftwaffe doesn’t seem interested in it..and by the time they get anything produced, other aircraft would’ve dominated the market already..
As for the Yak-130.. making it go supersonic would most likely require some structural changes, the Yak-130 was clearly designed to be an armed advance trainer first that could emulate AOA of modern fighters, and because of its capabilities, wanted to expand on it.. Also while it is fast..I wouldn’t say it’s at barely supersonic speeds.. however its counter part, the M-346 is significantly faster than the Yak-130 and that required re-engining and structural changes.
but, the T/A/F-50 was clearly designed from the offset to be BOTH an advance trainer and a combat aircraft to replace F-5s, which is why even before the A-50 was produced, the South Koreans already knew what kind of radar they wanted, etc. They definitely intend to have this aircraft armed with a BVR type missle (most probably AMRAAM)..while the yak-130 so far has mostly been seen with short range AAMs.
you’re certainly right over the disadvantage of the double engines on range.. like Elp best says.. its another engine that sucks up fuel on a small air frame..
If a country wants a cheap light fighter and they don’t want the possible political limitations that come with the T/A/F-50, then they would most likely go for the FC-1 or MiG-29 before they would even consider the Yak-130.

The cockpit of the latest Yak..
btw the versions you have posted above are the older ones, the current one has a pointier radome..
as for a replacement for MiG-21s, Mirage IIIs, etc.. the Yak-130 loses out to the F-50 in the fact that the Yak-130 is still a subsonic jet aircraft, while the F-50 has performance figures close to the Gripen. The climb rate, acceleration, etc of the Yak-130 still puts it as an advance trainer, although it has much better sustained turns and AOA than the average advance trainer.
Originally posted by flex297
Got any pictures, as well? I got one small picture of Uzbek Su-24M, I definitely would welcome some nice addition.The drawing of their Flanker is pretty common on the net and surely very well known..
Flex
Flex, unfortunately the place where I used to get pictures of Uzbek aircraft (uzreport.com), no longer allows free public viewing of its photo collection and I must subscribe to them 🙁
Originally posted by sumeet1981
Well guys IAF has announced that any new aircraft that will enter IAF’s service will be multirole.So no specialized/dedicated version of M2K-5 will be sought after.
If anything will come it will be the multirole M2K-5 or its variant. It will be interesting to see how much ToT is france willing to provide. The money flowing into french hands from this deal could well be used towards purchase of rafale for french air force or further development of the aircraft.
also, any missile that comes along with Mirage will be produced locally in india by BDL as per memorandum of understanding signed by BDL and MBDA last year.
also, this will come up as a shock for pakistan who want their JF-17 to be euipped with RC-400 and Sagem EW suite.
Lets wait until the time our air chief is officially there and lets see what cooks up in the meeting between him and Dassault.
Does anyone here think that India is waiting to see if Brazil is going to choose the Mirage 2000-5BR with the Rafale avionics, to see if they could get that version instead?
I don’t think Greece is a definite..
besides.. does the HAF really need the Eurofighter? They’ve ordered brand new F-16s and Mirages, enough to last them until the JSF is available for export. I don’t really understand why they want another aircraft type.
Originally posted by Srbin
lol so thats what these competitions get like, morons from all sides say this is can carry twice the “cargo” and “our radar is 5 times better than theirs”
thanks for the articles guys..
I definitely agree with you Srbin..those are some overly simplistic statements being made about each aircraft..but it’s too be expected.
The Russian offer seems pretty good actually.. the government brought up the India example..yet they dont seem to realize that IAPO builds India’s Flankers while KNAAPO seems to be the one promoting their Flanker variant to Brazil. KNAAPO has had a good history of getting things delivered on time..case in point with China and Indonesia’s flankers.
Originally posted by Srbin
Kazakhstan looks the best with Mig-31 and Su-27, I don’t think Uzbekistan or Turkemistan can cope with that even if they are very active.
Thanks for the numbers Srbin. However there are a few changes.. I had a chat with this Kazakh fellow who stated that the KzAF has up to 54 Flankers, mostly based in Astana. Shortly after he told me that, there were news articles stating that Russia has transferred several Su-27s and S-300s shortly after a joint Russia-Kazakh wargame 2 or 3 years ago.. so they now have up to 54..
the KzAF also averages 100 flying hours according to their president.
Although Kazakhstan has the best economy of the region and has the potential to invest more money.. arms procurement by Kazakhstan is very small compared to Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. Much of Kazakhstan’s weapons procurement after the collapse of the USSR came in the way of Gifts from various countries (primarily Russia).. not to mention that the Kazakhs still intend to have their Russian and Kazakh military to be closely incorporated with each other, which is why it doesn’t seem anything will happen..since their operations are so closely integrated with each other..
on the other hand Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan have independant military policies from Russia and have often gone their own ways.. Turkmenistan often approaching other ex-USSR countries for weapons procurement..while Uzbekistan looking to Europe and even India.
Furthermore.. Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are much more likely to use it in action since they have unstable neighbors/borders.
Originally posted by troung
“If India is wanting an Attack aircraft, how about the Mirage-2000D instead of the M2K-5, since it’s more specialized in that role and has been used in Afghanistan.”Well the newer Mirage 2000-5 Mk.2 is fully multi role unlike the Mirage 2000D. And seeing as there is a big threat of PAF interceptors a Mirage 2000-5 Mk.2 with MICA-EMs would be of more use in keeping one safe then R-550 Mk.2s.
Indeed the 2000-5 Mk.2 is more multirole however, I’m sure that you’re aware of role specialization vs. Jack of all trades, master of none (I was reading yours and Toms post on that Light Weight Mafia topic, which is pretty interesting).. but say if we follow the specialization approach like Tom said..then the Su-30MKI should be left as the air-superiority fighter with the Mirage 2000D handling the long range A2G weapons, etc. Hopefully the French “JDAM” that has been testing, will be included in the future.
If India is wanting an Attack aircraft, how about the Mirage-2000D instead of the M2K-5, since it’s more specialized in that role and has been used in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by MarocMirage
This sounds weird but now that you wrote that the Uzbeks have a good AF I must say that now I want to know more about the UzAF!!!
I had some great information about it somewhere, I’ll go find it later and be sure to let you know..
but off the top of my head.. they had their Mi-24s upgraded by a European company..i think it was Sagem.
Before 9-11, Uzbekistan had some terrorist problems of their own and they often used Su-24s to bomb them (often intruding into other countries airspace and accidentally hitting civilians).. and they had a low key involvement in assisting the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan.. or at least Dostum’s faction.
In the mean time, here’s the upgraded Uzbek Mi-24 for your eyes



Originally posted by MarocMirage
Just if you wanted to know, in the late 90s ( 97 or so ) Pakistan contacted Turkmenistan to buy their surplus Foxbats but they refused not to offend India ( IAF MiG-25 flew over Islamabad in 97).
well I’m not going to try to convince you to like any airforce since we’re all entitled to our own opinions.
Personally out of the 6 Central Asian nations.. Turkmenistan is one of the stronger ones (but the strongest is with the Uzbeks who have also been upgrading theirs and have used it in combat).
Thanks for that tidbit on the MiG-25.. India has been pretty active on getting countries in this region on their side.. it’s a bit ironic too..since one of the AFM’s stated that Turkmenistan sends some of it’s pilots to train in Pakistan.
It’s very interesting to see how many of these projects use a “podded” engine.
Originally posted by MarocMirage
German I thought but no one knows the exact figures.BTW what is so special about the TurAF?
what’s so special about any AF? The reason I posted was to see if anyone knew what kind of new aircraft purchases they made since they have been modernizing their military.
Originally posted by MarocMirage
VPK Mapo MiG-29A/UB ‘Fulcrum’ 22/2Mik.-Gur. MiG-25PD/PU ‘Foxbat’ 24
Mik.-Gur. MiG-23M/UB ‘Flogger’ 48
Suchoi Su-17M/UM-3 ‘Fitter’ 65
Suchoi Su-25/UB ‘Frogfoot’ 45
Antonow An-12 ‘Cub’ 3
Antonow An-24 ‘Coke’ 1
Mil Mi-24 ‘Hind’ 10
Mil Mi-8 ‘Hip’ 10
Mik.-Gur. MiG-21UM ‘Mongol’ 3
Jakowlew Jak-28U ‘Brewer’ 8
Suchoi Su-7BKP ‘Fitter’ 3 3
hmm did you get that from a Polish source? 🙂
Originally posted by Billy Bishop
How about their air defense systems? Do the Turkmens (Turkmenistanis?) have any S-300’s?
Hi Billy, information on Turkmenistan’s air defence is hard to come by..but there was supposed to be a transfer of Russian S-300’s to Turkmenistan.. here’s a bit of info I found on it, dated from 97′ so it probably might have happened already..
Date: 6 July 1997
Bibliography: Krasnaya zvezda, 6 July 1997, p. 7, by Aleksandr Uzhanov
Headline: CIS Air-Defense Will Become More Reliable
Orig. Source:Abstract:
Viktor Prudnikov, commander-in-chief of the Russian Air-Defense Forces, and his Uzbekistani and Turkmenistani counterparts reached an agreement that Russia will bolster the air-defense forces in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan with new missile systems. It was agreed that Uzbekistan’s old SAMs would be replaced with more advanced air-defense systems. In 1997-98, Turkmenistan will receive new SAMs to improve the air-defense system in its capital Ashgabat. Accordingly, Russia may provide S-300 [NATO designation SA-10 ‘Grumble’] SAMs to Turkmenistan
furthermore, and more definite.. is that Turkmenistan acquired the Kolchuga radar system from Ukraine (two of them) as well as Kalkan and Grif patrol boats.