Originally posted by google
Well, it seems like now everyone has a Matt Groening cartoon avatar.Chronological order of avatar implementation;
SOC- Bender
Me- Frye
I.P. Freely- Mr. Bruns
You- Krusty
Castor- Sideshow Bob
ah, you forgot the guy who uses Bartman as his avatar.. I think he/she is usually found posting on Indian aviation subjects.
Originally posted by google
WACHENR0DER, you have a Simpsons avatar too? 🙂
doesn’t everybody? 😀
Originally posted by PhantomII
Kh-28?What missile is that?
as google said, google is indeed your friend 😀
anyways, i’ll save you the time and do a cut and paste from FAS
Raduga Kh-28 (AS-9 Kyle)
Tactical missiles were also built by A. Berezhnyak’s “Raduga” OKB engineering group, but by a different route than taken by the “Zvezda” Design Bureau. While “Zvezda” started from light air-to-air missiles, “Raduga” scaled down heavy air-to-ground missiles for strategic aircraft into light tactical ones.
The Kh-28 (Article 93, alias D8) was built by applying to it Kh-22 and KSR-5 features. Its structure is a conventional aerodynamic one, with small delta wings. Its propulsion system is a two-stage liquid-fuel rocket engine. It was produced as early as the nineteen sixties, especially as an antiradar missile for Yak-28 bomber aircraft (the first Soviet missile of this type). It was, however, never actually put on Yak-28 aircraft but instead used as weapon of Su-7B/17/24 and Tu-22M aircraft. Series production of the Kh-28 began in 1971. The warhead is programmed prior to the missile launch, either by a “Filin” [Eagle Owl] set on board the aircraft (Su-24) or a “Metel” [Blizzard] set suspended from the aircraft (Su-7B/17, Tu-22M), to track the frequency of detected enemy ground radar. On the Su-17 aircraft this missile is suspended under the center line of the fuselage and the “Metel” set on the right underwing pylon. The missile is no longer used

Originally posted by SD-10
That big hump represents MIG-21.

so then this isn’t a mig-21..
http://www.stormpages.com/jetfight/fighter/J-7IIIA.jpg
From Huitong’s site
A rare photo of a J-7D being dragged by a braking parachute after landing is shown here. J-7D was co-developed by CAC and 611 Institute in the early 90s (first flew in August 1991 as J-7IIIA) in order to address some of the shortcomings of J-7C/Mig-21MF all-weather fighter, such as poor maneuverability and poor performance of its fire-control system. As the result, a more powerful WP-13FI turbojet (7,300kg w/ afterburning) was installed to improve the maneuverability. Avionics were upgraded as well, which include more reliable JL-7A J-band fire-control radar, HK-13A HUD and fire-control computer, JD-3II TACAN, 563B INS, and RKL-800 integrated ECM system, RKZ-404E chaff/flare dispenser. J-7D can be distinguished by a new set of BM/KJ 8602 RWR antennas on top of the vertical tailfin. The aircraft also features an improved weapon management system for carrying the latest PL series IR homing AAMs such as PL-8. Nevertheless, the J-7D design has proved to be as unsuccessful as J-7C, since it can neither fire medium-range radar-homing AAMs in BVR air combat, nor can it maneuver as agily as J-7E in close-in dogfight. Therefore in a sense it is no better than Mig-21bis which flew 20 years earlier. Only 32 were produced between 1995 and 1999. Like its predecessor, J-7D only saw limited service as a dedicated night fighter wearing a new light gray camouflage. Currently two night fighter regiments are equipped with J-7D: one in the 15th Division (serial number 30x6x) and the other in the 29th Division (serial number 25x0x
Originally posted by PhantomII
The new sheriff has arrived in town.Air-to-ground is a different story. Once Tranche 3 hits, then the Typhoon will be pretty close, but that’s not the case just yet.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that Tranche 3 was cancelled.
Personally I like the Rafale better, based on an earlier post from ELP, the air to ground munitions integration seems to have progressed farther on the Rafale than the Typhoon.
However if indeed this competition is a replacement for the A-4, isn’t all of these aircraft a bit too much in the first place?
Originally posted by Hyperwarp
Gents…………is this an MKI??
looks like one of the prototype MKIs
It’s only natural that large airforces will move away from foreign systems and rely more on domestic designs that could meet their doctrines.
With China and India beginning (or shall i say, already in the process of) using more and more of their own domestic designs, I guess this would realy hurt the Russian arms industry in the long run
Originally posted by I.P.Freely
Why the gift? Feeling sorry for invading them to start WW2?
Didn’t Germany also gave the Poles some Leapord2A4s at generous prices (or for free?)
http://www.deltawing.go.ro/sniper.html
the purpose of the SNiper upgrade is to simply bring it up to NATO compatibility.. perhaps the upgrade would’ve went faster under Elbit/Aerostar?
those are some odd paint schemes poland is using, are they standardizing the paint job on all the aircraft? or are the ex Czech ones going to retain that 2 tone grey/ 1 black scheme, the German ones retaining the german style one, and the others with the Soviet sytle one>?
Originally posted by Billy Bishop
I find it hard to believe that Romania can produce better avionics than Russia.
Whichi s why the Sniper upgrade uses mostly Israeli avionics.
probably to show people the airplane and the weapon upclose.
great pics Troung & Hyperwarp 🙂
Originally posted by Flanker_man
Sukhoi reckoned that they had tweaked the flight control software so that it was as agile without the TVC as it had been WITH the TVC.
Its flight display during MAKS 01 certainly looked agile enough!!!
Ken
hmm so if the Flanker no longer needs the TVC engine to reach the same level of agility, then I guess countries seeking the TVC engines should reconsider re-equipping the engines back to the “normal” ones and get their flight control software fixed?
Originally posted by m.ileduets
Interesting topic. Still there seem to be countries willing to opt for middle weigths: Finland chose the F/A-18 over the Gripen, Switzerland likewise over the F-16.
In Switzerland the F/A-18 is used in the A-A role exclusively. The reliability of a two engine airplane might have been decisive.
Small affluent countries with needs that don’t really justify a big plane will again opt for middle weights. Singapore will probably be the next one.
Yes about finland, it’s a bit surprising they chose the Hornet over the Gripen, especially considering the close ties they have with Sweden.