dark light

DanteXavier

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A glimpse into future US Fighter and Bomber design #2303781
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    What ‘situational awareness’ would a manned combat aircraft’s crew have – apart from looking out the window – that doesn’t come from the aircraft’s sensors in the first place? Data from those sensors can be sent to a pilot in a ground station somewhere safe, rather than a guy sitting in the plane at serious risk.

    Sounds nice in theory, especially when your only current martial occupation involves asymmetric warfare with rural folks in the middle east.

    As i.e. mentioned, the security of that datalink is not going to be guaranteed against an equally advanced enemy with the wits and equipment necessary to mess it all up (just as you would be able to screw with theirs).

    Your entire future scenario is predicated on the indefinite maintenance of asymmetric warfare and the hope that you never face an enemy with technological capabilities similar to your own.
    This sounds a bit riskier that I’d personally like. Unless you can find a way to completely eliminate that risk and guarantee your own supremacy into perpetuity, I’d wager that it would be wise to have at least a few manned aircraft in any future fleet. I wouldn’t want a wily opponent to come out of nowhere and render my air force entirely useless.

    As for the whole safety bit, I’d be careful there as well. War is inherently dangerous. Safety is rarely ever one of its features. Mitigating said danger is a noble goal, but at some point risk is going to be inevitable. Try to cross that line by making safety a priority as you engage in an inherently unsafe but necessary activity(war) and you risk jeopardizing your ability to win a conflict (ex. rendering yourself unprepared for symmetric warfare).

    Granted, all of this is my conjecture, but take it as you will. Just my two cents.

    Unmanned aircraft have already taken over most of the ISR roles. The cost/risk/benefit analysis for strike missions in high-threat environments is already heavily in favour of unmanned assets. In the future, the only significant manned combat aircraft requirement will be for air defence/policing, insofar as visual ID is required.

    Time will tell.

    in reply to: A glimpse into future US Fighter and Bomber design #2310084
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Star Wars is where those designs belong! Next-generation combat aircraft will not need to be manned.

    Doubtful.

    Unmanned aircraft will do just fine for asymmetric warfare. In any other case(read: when nations like the USA have the potential to come up against REAL advanced enemies with formidable technological knowhow), the situational awareness a manned aircraft provides is going to be necessary and useful. The ultimate capability of the computer (a machine capable of thinking only in a formulaic manner) is more limited than people think.

    Manned aircraft will always be around in some significant capacity for this reason. The typical contrast presented between manned and unmanned aircraft (a contrast which almost always seems to paint unmanned aircraft as superior in nearly all scenarios) is fundamentally flawed.

    If people don’t get this now, they’ll find out later.

    in reply to: The End of Stealth? #2333294
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    10 years from now IR detectors range and fidelity would prob be good enough for setting up the intial fire solution for an IR based MRBVR.

    processing techniques, not necessary emitting power would primarily determine radar’s effectiveness vs an LO target.

    but in contrary, non-LO vehicles would not be in vogue again. because these same technology will work better vs non-LO targets. likely the battle space would be very inhospitable for non-LO targets. LO would not be invincible, but Non-LO would be extremely vulnerable.

    Could advances in ECM/EW help to protect these LO targets, and are any such advances on the horizon/likely? I assume nations without LO aircraft would want to seek some way to protect their assets.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #10 #2463370
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Jamaican Defence Force

    DA-40-FP Diamond Star, Bell 412, BN-2 Islander and something that looks like a Ce206 Stationair?

    No need quoting images… thank you

    Fantastic photos! JDF pics are too rare.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #10 #2501022
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Chadian Air Force, photos from this month-Mi-24s, an Mi-8 and a PC-9:

    http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/3576/eda6b157ql2.jpg

    http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/676/b9de631bnh8.jpg

    http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/9746/79508963ks3.jpg

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #9, for Pictures and Discussion. #2510153
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Speaking of scantily-equipped Namibian AF things.
    This is more like it.. !! Muhahhaha :diablo: :diablo: :diablo:

    http://williamsze.spaces.live.com/blog/

    http://williamsze.spaces.live.com/photos/cns!F335D09CE899BE1C!278/

    You. Are. Awesome.:D

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #9, for Pictures and Discussion. #2529560
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Now here’s a particularly rare shot. This is an RSS C-26 metro. The Regional Security System is a joint defence organization composed of several Eastern Caribbean island nations, including Antigua & Barbuda, Barbados, Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts & Nevis, St. Lucia and St. Vincent & The Grenadines.

    The C-26s were donated by the US in 1996, and both of them are based in Barbados at Grantly Adams IAP. Because of that, some people consider the planes to be part of the Barbados Defence Force.

    http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/4261/c26metrofh2.jpg

    A visitor took it randomly while in barbados for the Cricket World Cup.

    in reply to: F-16 for Morocco ? #2506060
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    I’ve read that the F-16 were second-hand.

    If that’s true, then how are some few second hand F-16s going to deter nations like Algeria(Su-30, Mig-29)? And why should morrocco consider second hand aircraft alongside brand new Rafales?

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world #2508958
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Indian air force to buy attack helicopters

    NEW DELHI, Sept. 27 (UPI) — The Indian air force is considering buying new attack helicopters to boost air surveillance and fighting capabilities.

    The air force is set to buy new attack and heavy-lift helicopters that bolster air surveillance and the air-to-ground fighting capabilities in the higher reaches of the Himalayas, The Asian Age newspaper reported Thursday.

    It has also put censors aboard unmanned aerial vehicles and has been training hard on the concepts of waging battle from standoff distances, an IAF official said. He said the IAF will deploy its fighters back to Hindon air base, near New Delhi, to provide immediate help in case of any emergency.

    He said postwar maneuvers are being undertaken regularly to validate new concepts in precision attacks, waging aerial campaigns from standoff distance for a more effective interdiction in military campaigns in the mountains.

    He said the IAF recently conducted aerial war games to validate these new concepts. Ahluwalia said about 120 to 130 frontline fighters including various versions of the MiGs, Sukhois and UAVs participated in the war games, which were conducted in the Himalayas.

    http://www.upi.com/International_Sec…icopters/1041/

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2522155
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    I posted some old imagery I had saved of some things at Dingxin in my blog:

    http://geimint.blogspot.com/2007/08/chinese-military-modernization.html

    Wow, great read and great pics to!

    DanteXavier
    Participant

    The press has an annoying habit of just adding the suffix “ski” onto the end of anything to make it sound russian. They forget that “ski” is really more of a polish surname feature, not a russian one.

    “ov”, or “enko” or “in” would probably be a little better if you really want to make the thing sound Russian. if you’re going to throw out nicknames cornily like that, at least do it right:cool:

    in reply to: SU-30's to fly at Waddington airshow #2508369
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Sounds like it would be entertaining-I’d love to see the Indian MKI’s…

    DanteXavier
    Participant

    kenyan Air force tucanos doing a flyby at 2007 independence day celebrations

    http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/5816/kenyanairforcetucanosdokn6.jpg

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/httpwwwactionpixsmarukocom/526281563/

    in reply to: Snowbird down #2526374
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Here is a pic

    in reply to: General Discussion #314823
    DanteXavier
    Participant

    Is it really hard to figure out why 15 year (I assume I got the age right) boy is into Paris Hilton??? Or to any pretty girl for that matter…It would be weird if not…;)

    I’m 15…personally, i hate her with a passion and i kind of hope that she stays in prison(of course, she wont…:rolleyes: ). But there are a few boys my age(I’d say maybe 10-20% of the overall population of 15-16 year olds) who think she’s hot.

    I don’t get it, really. She’s too skinny and her personality sucks, but to each his own.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 33 total)