Globespan were never going to YYZ anyway, they were going to Hamilton because YYZ’s landing fees are so high i guess

So why is it letting me book MAN-YYZ-MAN on GSM101/102?

MYT162 Alicante-Manchester that’s due in around 1235, is an A321.

Airport arrivals for there is also showing the 173 as an A321.

If you use the theory that an airport should be named after the city it is nearest to then BFS should rename itself Lisburn International – Lisburn had city status conferred on it last year and is much closer to BFS than Belfast is!

Not a lot between them I’m afraid, straight line distance in Google Earth from each city centre to the reference point for the aerodrome, there isn’t even a mile between them.

Type in Lisburn-Belfast International and Belfast-Belfast International to the RAC Route Planner. It gives a 18.6mile (estimated 24min) from Belfast, and 18.4mile (28min) journey from Lisburn. Again, hardly ‘much closer.’

Being serious, I respect your views but all we EVER seem to hear is anti-BFS.

You seem to be forgetting the fact that the pilots would have a high workload during a go-around, their concentration would be on flying rather than discussing the details of the go-around with ATC.

Gosh, what another great thread from ALL My Contributions r Crap.

Your whole anti-BFS and any airline to do with it campaign has become very tiresome. Give it a rest!

why though
BA is crap

Because they won’t start longhaul from MAN? In that case, nearly every airline in the world is crap, gosh, what a crap world.

It’s an A321, regular. They also used the A300 each week on flights over the summer to Dalaman or Bodrum.

At 2120, not going to see particularly much, t’is rather dark these nights at that hour 🙁

Very nice, I saw G-LASB earlier today departing BFS to TFS, ooo how I wish I was heading for sunnier climates!