I find some of his points are valid, some not necessarily so- but theres a lot that can be said for not just shouting him down, saying “fine, we disagree” & going on. Right now, its just piling on, with one poster ranged against half a dozen, calling him everything from Idi Amin to Pol Pot. [And that last bit was a pun]
:rolleyes:
Where is the flaming? I don’t see anyone flaming here except you are the one using many insult words toward another member since you cannot answer your own statment.
Nonsense. Look at your own post. If I were to make one generalizing about the J-10 and Chinese posters in a similar vein, you’d be yelling from the rafters.
I do see this thread is called “J-10 versus LCA-AESA”
More selective reading. How many threads in this forum have played exactly by the script? My post & Bringitons response (which implies he understood what I said) clearly refer to a specific situation- F-16 Block 52’s against a LCA. Reason I referred to that was because a poster had said that the MMR needs to be an AESA, I pointed out that for many of its possible threats (including the vast majority of third generation fighters), it needs no such thing, and with AWACS on both sides, the situation becomes even more fluid. How you read that into some insult against the J-10 is beyond me. A hundred times over with reference to the context in which the post was made, yet you persist. I hold my own views on the J-10 vs the LCA, but based as it is on Indian data, I know you guys will not believe it, and it will lead to more flaming, so I already said I have no interest in going down that path..but hey, as if it matters!
If you like to participate in that thread, you can join there and post.
Besides, are you Flogger?
Yeah sure, I’ll pass! I can well imagine what the reaction would be if more imagined complaints against the J-10 were thought of, even when I didnt mention it.
Then what your LCA looks at 1st refer to?
Care to put that in understandable language? I have no idea what you are speaking of.
I just use his tactics to assembly a rely to him, what piling to your service?
There are half a dozen yelling at him, ever heard of agree to disagree and leaving the debate? Instead keep shouting him down, wonderful.
Fair point- but- a caveat
How are the J-10/ JF-17 superior to even the “restricted” F-16s? If they get EW reprogramming, the PAF will go for them. Please tell.
Yawn. More flaming, and more of the usual. Admins, lock this thread please- it just reinforces the usual prejudice/s.
Yes, Chinawhite actually did a sound job by keeping asking the other party to confirm Why should it be that “LCA can look 1st” if only it’s physically smaller. .
:rolleyes:
Do you see the J-10 anywhere?
You are best served with piling on other posters in the other J-10 thread.
Your not even worth my time, i’ve wasted to much time asking an answer you seemingly refuse to answer
The answer was provided to you a million times, you CHOSE not to read it.
:rolleyes:
Agreed
Fine.
What other meanings does “the LCA can have the first look” have?
What other meanings does “the LCA can have the first look” have?
What other meanings does “the LCA can have the first look” have?
What other meanings does “the LCA can have the first look” have?
What other meanings does “the LCA can have the first look” have?
What other meanings does “the LCA can have the first look” have?Now, i have posted it 6 times here. Can you finally answer it
IT
Can you read?
Maybe its not my “native” english but yours? . Maybe you were to quick to judge
Hardly, your behaviour in this thread testifies to the fact that you are unable to grasp any meaning of the word context, whatsoever. Either that, or you persist in not understanding deliberately.
Take this to PMs – this thread has been messed up enough already.
What other meanings does “the LCA can have the first look” have?
I have already asked you countless times
And I have replied countless times…your continued unwillingness to look at the reply above, in response to Bringitons post about other aircraft in the subcontinent vis a vis the LCA, proves that you are
a) Refusing to do so
b) You are baiting and trolling
Either those, or its c) That you cant read.
You replaced the yadda, yadda da da with a link.
LOL!
Here..
yada yada yada
That means more and more of the same from you…
Its clear you cant understand whats being written…its ok, if you are a non native English speaker and get confused, but your continued and insistent misunderstandings buttress the point..
You edited it out again,
How unusual
Oh enough whinging already.
Trying to reason with you is like trying to tell a dog not to wag its tail
Yawn, anything else? :rolleyes:
I tried to ignore you personal insults.
You misrepresented my words, and continued doing so. Talk about “personal insults”.
I didn’t read your mind, i read your post in the context of the topic
Right, after selectively choosing which posts to pick and which to leave.
Where did i write that?
Making more lies up?
ROTFLMAO, you really have a problem with understanding whats written! When did I say that it was you who said it. I advised YOU to stop doing so!!
Which has nothing to do with that statement or the subject.
Enough of your nonsense already. So now you can read minds eh? Anything else? Or this time, what you’ll decide what parts of the thread to ignore? :rolleyes:
Quit trolling, get a life. :rolleyes: