dark light

wcfcfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 199 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Reds at Valley – 10/07/09 #477951
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    Ahem, that will be due to my poor photographic skills….

    wcfcfan
    Participant

    He is aware of the site, it’s lodged firmly in his favourites!

    Steve

    in reply to: first time on here #447880
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    Another thing I would suggest is to make sure that the horizon is exactly level. It will make a big improvement. You can do this in a free program I use call GIMP (Genetic Image Manipulation Program). Simply rotate the image til the horizon is level, then crop off the white bits which will appear at the edge of the image as you rotate it.

    Steve

    in reply to: Sally B technical problem? #1203245
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    That’s correct, she didn’t make Cosford or the Madingley fly-by, but she did fly at Duxford’s Spring Airshow (17th May), or is my mind playing tricks?

    I’ve not seen anything anywhere about the current issue she has

    Steve

    in reply to: Whats wrong with this picture? #1208451
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    The real question is….will it be at Legends????

    in reply to: A few from Cosford – 18 Pics #482748
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    Thanks for the comments all.

    Lens and camera – Bog standard Nikon D50, with a cheapo Nikkor 70-300mm which you pick up off e-bay for around £70. All the jets are shot on Aperture priority around f.8, all the props on Shutter Priority around 1/250th, to get a bit of prop blur.

    It should be stressed that I shot off over 1600 frames – the more you shoot the more chance of getting a good shot is my view!

    Also, there’s quite a bit of post-editing going on, contrast changes, sharpening etc.

    As for the timing on the Reds shot, it’s not as difficult as it looks. I focus on one and fire away on a quick shutter speed in continuous shooting mode. After enough passes you are bound to get one opposition pass!

    Steve

    in reply to: Raf Cosford Airshow this weekend #1213286
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    A bit thin on RAF hardware Typhoon, Hawk and er, er, er, I’m getting stuck now.

    Erm, Chinook, Tutor, King Air?

    in reply to: British post-war commercial aircraft survivors #1215783
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    Don’t forget the two BAC 1-11’s flown by ETPS out of Boscombe – I’ve not got serials to hand but can add them later if required

    Steve

    in reply to: Tamron or Sigma 70-300 #448056
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    Well I’m in the same position at the moment, looking for a new lens for the D40, and I’ve heard very good things about the APO Sigma lens – I think it’s about £175 from some places on-line

    Steve

    in reply to: Sat 16th May EGPF Very Large Post #464978
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    I usually crop and sharpen first, do what I need to do other than re-size, then run the file through Neatimage and finally re-size to a web compatible size, usually 800×532

    Cheers
    Steve

    in reply to: Sat 16th May EGPF Very Large Post #464994
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    I hope you don’t mind, but I took the liberty of running the KLM shot through Neatimage –

    Before –
    http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd258/wcfcfan/klm-before.jpg

    After –
    http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd258/wcfcfan/klm-after.jpg

    It shows up particularly well on the darker belly of the aircraft, which appears to be mottled somewhat in the first shot. Hey presto though – all gone!

    It really is a nifty little program, and most people will use Neatimage as their last but one process, before re-sizing to web standard size.

    It’s available here – http://www.neatimage.com/ – No I don’t work for them!

    I should say, it’s not actually Freeware, the free version has some limitations on what you can do, but is ok for basic noise removal

    Cheers
    Steve

    in reply to: Sat 16th May EGPF Very Large Post #464999
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    Good efforts, in bad conditions.

    One thing it may be worth doing is downloading a program called Neatimage and running all your shots through the program. It has a filter to eliminate all the ‘noise’ on the shots. A couple of yours, such as the KLM shot, have a speckled effect on the blue parts, and Neatimage will eliminate this.

    I only found out about Neatimage a couple of weeks ago, but it’s a great Freeware program

    Cheers
    Steve

    in reply to: Spitfire Gate Guards #1165742
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    I am not famliar with the name Perdiswell associated with surviving Spitfires. This website suggests Perdiswell is what I have known as the Worcester ATC location…a different Mk 21 Spitfire – LA198 and it still survives.

    Mark

    Thanks Mark,

    You are quite right, Perdiswell is/was the Worcester ATC base, and it was LA198 that was based there.

    The Malvern ATC Spit is a different a/c

    Thanks for your help

    Steve

    in reply to: Spitfire Gate Guards #1171377
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    LA228/F at Malvern. There are shots on the A-B website.

    http://www.abpic.co.uk/results.php?q=LA228&fields=all&sort=latest&limit=10

    Mark

    Yes, that’s the one! I believe it was gate guard at Perdiswell after Malvern, can you confirm that? Also, do you know its eventual fate?

    in reply to: Spitfire Gate Guards #1172220
    wcfcfan
    Participant

    Mark,

    I don’t think so –

    This one was on display at Malvern ATC (Sling Lane) in the 50s and then moved to Perdiswell and scrapped. Any ideas?

    I have seen pics of it at Malvern, but nothing at Perdiswell.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 199 total)