dark light

André1967

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 148 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Searching for a Walter Micron II/III #1102756
    André1967
    Participant

    Cant help with the engine Im afraid, but to help with searches, especially on the web, it is Mikron, or thats what I have always known it as anyway.

    Pete

    Fixed it. Thanks!

    Are you looking for an airworthy engine, or something for ground running, or static?

    You can’t have the newly rebuilt one below, but we’ve got quite a lot of bits left over from the rebuild! PM me if you wish….

    We need a complete, airworthy engine. Thanks!

    in reply to: F-14/15 early competition #2355814
    André1967
    Participant

    Tomcat was more respected then is now.

    Kind of a bald statement to make.

    in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2356467
    André1967
    Participant

    why doesn’t the US allow transfer of F-22 to countries like japan and australia that are desperate for it ?

    it would also reduce the price tag and allow the USAF to get a few more F-22’s from the re-opened production lines.

    It tries to avoid that main defense assets end up in the wrong hands like the Grumman F-14 Tomcat in Iran right now.

    Allies may change over the years and it would be bad to face your own technology at the end. Japan was an ally in WW.1, an enemy in WW.2 and an ally in the Cold War again. Well Australia, I won’t get into that. 😀

    André1967
    Participant

    You know he got a ride in a Superbug once!? Boeing did it to shut him up and point out its advantages for Australia.

    Sadly no F-35 twinseater planned so that’s not gone work again. 😀

    Like many said before, his writings are a good read.

    in reply to: Looking for a O-320 engine. #417722
    André1967
    Participant

    Aaah.

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Typhoon question. #2411581
    André1967
    Participant

    Thank you Scorpion82!

    in reply to: Another over-run…. #494030
    André1967
    Participant
    in reply to: Birdstrike #425431
    André1967
    Participant

    Black hawk vs Blackhawk

    Guess what was for dinner during X-mas? 😀
    A tad different than the odd Turkey.

    in reply to: Looking for information concerning Sergent Chef BIAGGI #1100197
    André1967
    Participant

    Still my favorite thread.
    Even after 6 months still new information comes up.

    All involved, thank you for sharing your efforts and good luck with your new inquiries in 2010!

    André Jans

    in reply to: General Discussion #353264
    André1967
    Participant

    Been keeping an eye on US and Dutch media over the past hours and its amazing how media digs up ‘facts’. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Attempted mid air bombing in Detriot? #1919593
    André1967
    Participant

    Been keeping an eye on US and Dutch media over the past hours and its amazing how media digs up ‘facts’. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Typhoon In The Falklands, Argentine Enraged? #2437626
    André1967
    Participant

    Does Gibraltar still have that heavy coastal artillery?
    I guess not, but it would be pretty interesting to see a slug match between the coastal defences and a coupple of Dutch destroyers..

    Once we’ve conquered it we will force all population to eat tulips and wear wooden shoes. (or was it the other way?) 😀

    in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2022369
    André1967
    Participant

    An interesting proposition would be a Carrier capable Tornado IDS and ADV. Would it be Doable?

    For Brasil or the UK?

    Think the Tornado airframe wasn’t designed for carrier operations anyway.

    No doubt this topic developped in an interesting discussion.
    In case of the Falklands, the carriers were of importance for the UK but not for Argentina. As far as I know Brasil has no far over sea interests like the UK has with the Falklands so would it need a carrier at all?

    in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2022718
    André1967
    Participant

    Feel free to disagree. 😉

    Past armed conflicts like the Kosovo war, Falkland campaign and Iraq required large scale AWACS and air to air refueling capacity. There was less need for aircraft carriers. Even in OEF, air to air refueling is required to operate USN fighters over Afghanistan.

    Besides a long coastline, Brasil also has a large airspace over land which could not be covered by a carrier. Some AWACS and Tanker capacity could though even they might not be sexy enough. :p

    Imaging what the Flakland War had brought if both parties had AEW and air to air refueling resources.
    Instead Argentina’s old carrier stayed in port due to a submarine threat while the UK kept them far the Exocet threat. Both parties lacked AEW, while Argentina’s fighters only could fly limited time on target due to their limited fuel situation.

    in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2022876
    André1967
    Participant

    After the RAFALE buying, the Brazilain Navy need a new aircraft carrier ?

    I think it would be wiser to get rid of that old carrier and buy some additional air refueling tankers.. Its cheaper and makes more flexible (read quicker) alerts possible during out of area Ops.

    Its not only a carrier which sucks up the budget rather quick but you also need an escort and support fleet to keep it going.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 148 total)