He probably means the one outside the old Liverpool terminal building that acts as a guardian, but im sure Roy will elaborate.

Kind regards

Steve

As Mr. Adlam seems intent on making posts which promote his business, shouldn’t these posts be considered to be breaking Rule 6 of the Code of Conduct?

“6) Blatant advertising of products and services is unacceptable, if you wish to advertise please contact our advertising team on +44(0)1780755131 or email [email]info@keypublishing.com[/email]”

Seems pretty blatant to me.

regards,

kev35

Kev, if we were to take issue with Mr Adlams postings then surely you should take issue with the many other similar posts that are on this forum which advertise products on private sites or members own items on ebay.

He’s hardly the first. Sometimes these items seem to be of genuine interest to some people.

kind regards, Steve

Instead of talking about what you would do if you found them, which you won’t, why not go and do something useful like massage your ego.

Instead of mouthing pure arrogant bile why not stand for election, you already have a manifesto, change the world with your actions rathen just opening your mouth.

Regards,

kev35

well said, the original act is very sad and deplorable, sadly however it provides an excuse for the verbal onslaught of bigotted and racist views that centre on popular scapegoats. If you want to change the world do as Kev suggests or even just something small closer to home will make a small difference.

flypast did a survey some years ago, no doubt it will be a little out of date but may be of help, can anyone remember the issue number, i think it was latter half of the 90s.

I believe this is 97sqn, I was told this was taken over Singapore by the veteran who allowed me to copy the image.

If you require any further info please pm me

here is a passage from wikipedia (not always the most reliable of sources admittedly),

“The duration of Crown copyright varies depending whether material is published or unpublished. Unpublished material was originally subject to copyright protection in perpetuity. However, the 1988 Act removed this concept from British law. Transitional provisions apply for 50 years after the entry into force of the 1988 Act which mean that no unpublished material will lose its copyright protection until January 1, 2040. New Crown copyright material that is unpublished has copyright protection for 125 years from date of creation. Published Crown copyright material has protection for 50 years from date of publication. Those works protected under Letters Patent have perpetual copyright claimed over them despite being published. Works where copyright is assigned to the Crown by an author are subject to the normal term of protection for that particular type of work, for example life of the author plus 70 years for a literary work”

so does this mean that any image taken prior to 1956 is therefore usuable without fee or have I got this completely wrong?

thanks in advance, Steve