There is another factor that is considered and that is the fact the thrust is related to temperature difference from the front of the engine to the exhaust (EGT). The engine has a finite temperature it can withstand so if the temperature is higher the difference across the engine is lower as is the maximum available thrust. On the fuel consumption it means that if the OAT is higher the EGT also has to be higher. To acheive this a greater amount of fuel is required to be burnt.
There is a little negative to flying higher and that is that, as already mentioned, the air is thinner and therefore the IAS reduces. With a lower IAS the angle of attack has to increase or the IAS must increase. If AOA increases so does the drag and therefore fuel used. To go faster, more fuel is also used. As you can see it is not as simple as going higher to save fuel especially when you factor in winds too.
There is also a site called http://www.crewconnected.com . It may be worth a go. I am pretty sure there is an Australian version of friends reunited too. I assume you have already tried the pprune lost sheep section.
RDC1000 got it basically. Have you tried standing up from a recumbent position lately. It takes a 2 stage movement and a fair amount of effort. Also, if lying down, you are more likely to be asleep and therefore will react slower to an evacuation command. There is also the deceleration side of it all too. It’s too easy to slide under a restraint if lying down. If you give the choice to people to have the seat upright or reclined then you scupper the people who seat back count to find the nearest exit. I do it while sitting waiting for the magic to happen. I count how many seats I will feel on my way to the nearest exit. If some were horizontal, I would have no clue.
As an aside, I flew into Fairford the other day and saw an old VC10 parked there which reminded me of travelling to Washington DC years ago in one as a kid and the seats in there all being rear facing. They had them like that for the crash scenario but it never took on.
The septics are so sensitive. They really need to get a life! If it were me I’d have bought you a coffee down the stairs. How do you take it?
I have heard from a friend of mine who works for them and he confirms the name change. Interesting choice of names and not sure they can use an existing name. I know bands definitely can’t if that counts!
I think you will find that comes under the heading of commercially sensitive information.
Don’t expect any youthful crew to while away the time with. Good flights like the Londons are bid for and given to the senior crew. Look out for zimmer frames in the fwd galley! Nice aircraft to be pax in though so never mind the oldies. As stated above your PSP will be fine as long as the signs are off but it is always worth checking the inflight mag for confirmation.
I’ve flown cars in the belly of a 767-300. The forward door is just big enough to get cars in. I had a Merc coupe but have seen Lambo’s and Ferraris coming out of them too. It is a tight squeeze though. Has to be on a pallet to spread the load evenly across the floor and to provide securing points as once the car is in, there is no room to get down the side to secure it.
PMN – The 757 sound is a result of the RB211-535E4 motors they use. They are a 3 spool engine whereas most turbofans these days are 2 spoolers. The 744 use the same units but the sound is somewhat different as there are 4 of them but you can still pick out that underlying tone.
WD – Doubt any negative G. The 75 is not certified for any negative G. Probably recovered from it with some sort of wing over/chandelle manoeuver otherwise it would be plenty of negative G.
Thanks for that Cking. A good bit of info to be stored in the back of my mind in case I go back on the 73 one day. I’ve also read that it can happen when the FCU/FFG doesn’t shut off properly and a small amount of fuel pools in the combustion chamber and reignites on the next start particularly on short turn arounds. I’ve certainly seen the PW4000’s dripping fuel after shutdown when the fuel continues to flow after shut down.
It will be totally dependant on the winds on the day. Recently the headwinds were so strong they routed us down to Santiago Di Compostela in NW Spain before launching across the pond. We came very close to the Azores and even managed to see the peaks of a couple of the volcanoes. It is unusual to go this far south. The only country you will normally fly over on the way from here to Cuba is the Bahamas.
Going that far north I should imagine they are headed for the west coast of the states most probably from somewhere like FFM.
Deano – It may be that your browsers cache is full. I am assuming though that you have Media Player installed though s that is required. If you have a download manager have it running and you should be able to grab the video from the site.
I think they are done in Montana somewhere. It is mostly 777 stuff as there was a Boeing video released some years ago which I think these were lifted from with the SP thrown in for good measure.
There are a lot of good videos on there. The surf plane one is in a different league to me as that is getting it wrong bug time. There is the video of the 707 doing the barrell roll on there too.
They are skilled but one thing I find interesting is that they are supposed to be demonstrating the ability to land without aligning the aircraft with the runway in these conditions as that is how Boeing reccommend it is done. On several of the landings you can see them off setting the drift before touch down which I am sure is a completely subconscious move.