I think a lot of AShMs could. A direct hit, or even a near miss from a Mk82 would destroy an MBT, so I’m pretty sure it would cause damage beyond the armour of any battleship too and plenty of missiles have 500lb class warheads, then you have stuff like P-700s, Kh-22s and DF-21Ds. I certainly wouldn’t volunteer to be inside the ship while all that is hitting it.
If I don’t like the things happening in this country I want the UK people to be able to vote out the people whose policies caused those things. I do not want to have to rely on 27 other countries to vote them out and then vote in a person who will change them.
What good has having a vote and veto done us so far?
Business leaders will protect their businesses ahead of the interests of the country. There will be winners and losers. Overall there will be more winners than losers, but that won’t stop the losers complaining.
Have to say I don’t understand this at all. WTO trading doesn’t prevent imports coming from the EU, it doesn’t even force us to place maximum tariffs on everything just because we can. So unless the EU has stated that it will cut off all exports to the UK in the event of a no deal, I have no idea what this is about at all.
I think it’s fair to say things turned out very different to what was signed up to in 1975 and if we were to re-state statements made then, they would seem laughable now. Even the EU is very different to 1993 and the Lisbon Treaty is basically the rejected EU Constitution rewritten as a treaty. A woman in Northern Ireland also stated that the only money they get around there is from the EU during the Remain campaign. So we were lied to to get us into the EU, lied to every step of the way and lied to by the Remain campaign and yet you have a problem because you think a few untruths were told by the Leave campaign?
Same one you’ve been using until now unless told otherwise. As for the way things turned out, I think it’s fair to say that things turned out very different to what people signed up for in 1975 and even the EU turned out very different to the way it was in 1993. There’s also a Remain video on YouTube with a woman in Northern Ireland claiming that the only money they get round there is from the EU. I also think it’s fair to say that the Lisbon Treaty is basically the rejected EU Constitution rewritten as a treaty. So we were lied to in order to get us into the EU and lied to every step of the way since, so why is it so special even if someone did lie to get us out.
They need to end the talks and just leave, that will solve the uncertainty which is the source of the problem.
^December 13th 1986.
Well there needs to be a plan for the future, you can’t have storms wiping out several expensive premier air superiority assets every time. Bunkers or hardened hangars would do, but there needs to be something.
It is actually 40% to 16% but what the percentages don’t tell you is that the absolute magnitudes are 1:3. There is 3 times as much coming into the UK as going out. Therefore there is 3 times as much market to gain as to lose and/or 3 times as much to collect in tariffs, not to mention that a no deal would avoid the £40bn divorce bill. Staying until the end of 2020 would involve us paying more of this divorce bill (circa £20bn of it) and at the end of 2020 we would still be stuck with this same stalemate. Better to get out now and save that £20bn and collect up to £30bn in tariffs.
John – No deal could leave us better than Chequers but it is more risky. That said, I would certainly opt for no deal before backing down on maintaining the integrity of the UK internal market. And if nothing can be agreed before the end of March 2019, then no deal it is, since there is no reason to believe anything will have changed in 1 or 2 years from now.
The storm was known about several days in advance, that’s enough for an emergency response. I have seen an F-22 loaded into a C-5 before and I know it can be done. I also know that when the ASTRA(?) crashed at Boscombe Down in the UK it took only 36 hours to divert such resources from the other side of the Atlantic and have it gone.
I think they should stick with the Chequers Plan. It’s the only option that solves the Ireland border whilst keeping both parts of it in their respective internal markets. If the EU doesn’t accept that then no deal. The mistake they made was starting with the Chequers Plan, a good negotiator would have started with something much more unacceptable and worked down towards the Chequers Plan. Your first offer should never be your desired deal point, that was just dumb.
That seems like a whole shed load less work than trying to fix a dozen storm-battered stealth fighters. But I agree that a C-5 would probably be the way to go, not lorry.