dark light

St. John

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 547 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #223631
    St. John
    Participant

    Working fine for me too now. I was getting a site blocked warning for a few days though.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2149946
    St. John
    Participant

    It’s (un)surprisingly unable to perform any long range cruise misisle strike and will remain so.

    care to elaborate?

    I think he means that Storm Shadow is almost qualified and it would surely be fairly easy to take-off from Cyprus, fire it and RTB, which is about the extent of the strike mission conducted here.

    in reply to: jet fighters vs armed helicopters #2150376
    St. John
    Participant

    There’s 1 listed against an Iraqi MiG-21 by an Iranian AH-1J.

    in reply to: USAF vs Russian SAMs, RuAF vs US SAMs. #2153123
    St. John
    Participant

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2153472
    St. John
    Participant

    I thought the cancelled RS-26 Rubezh was due to be a short range ICBM with a range just about the INF threshold?

    in reply to: Jan 19, 1991 mig-25 vs F-15 #2153623
    St. John
    Participant
    in reply to: World Missiles News #1784152
    St. John
    Participant
    in reply to: USAF vs Russian SAMs, RuAF vs US SAMs. #2153852
    St. John
    Participant

    IMO it’s a normal R-27ET. Roughly 10s burn time, easily capable of reaching medium altitudes from a surface launch. Unlikely they’d remove the explosives, the R-27’s hit rate is not good enough to use it as a KE interceptor. At 0:22, you can also see a cloud where the initial explosion occurred.

    in reply to: USAF vs Russian SAMs, RuAF vs US SAMs. #2153861
    St. John
    Participant

    First plane landed with damage to rear stab and second plane’s pilot managed to put out fire with help from onboard systems.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2153943
    St. John
    Participant

    Rubezh has been cancelled now anyway, see missiles news section.

    in reply to: Saudi aircrafts hit by missiles #2154007
    St. John
    Participant

    Here’s the video (alleged).

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154267
    St. John
    Participant

    The Kinzhal can only be a ballistic missile to attain that range. The Kh-32 has a range of only 1,000km flying at high altitude and that is huge relative to Kinzhal.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154387
    St. John
    Participant

    No it isn’t. uS debt is now 21T over GDP of 19T (yeah right). That’s also not including liabilities.

    Yes but the GDP is growing faster than the debt, i.e. the debt as % of GDP is reducing.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154459
    St. John
    Participant

    let see China can repeat what Russia did with 40,000 sorties in Middleast and that was mostly done with technology and equipment manufactured in 1970-80s. now the modern equipment is entering Russia. it will have big impact. I don’t think China has test fired that many long range cruise missiles.
    neither China or US can afford arms race. both are polluting environment so much that all the money will go to expensive health care. US need external human resources and components due dysfunctional education that is creating trade deficits/inflation. China need to steal or import high end stuff.. I don’t see how they can compete with Russia. Russia nuclear arsenal is modern than both. it has titanium valley and factories located in low cost regions.

    You are right that China copies a lot, I said they were the only ones who could afford it. Right now the US GDP is outgrowing debt, and only a small increase in defence spending of 0.5% GDP would amount to $100bn, which is spent on SDI, would go a long way.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2154545
    St. John
    Participant

    SO it is a future of huge sums of money blown on systems that don’t offer the 100% reliability (or close) to actually solve the political problem of “rogue” states with ICBMs, and a huge destabilization as well as the inevitable reaction of established nuclear powers on the parts of their nuclear arsenals. Great!

    Well no system is 100% effective, which is why you have to apply quantity. In its original guise however, SDI promised ground-based lasers and space mirrors, KV-truck satellites and small orbiting KV-satellites with detection and homing built in. Unfortunately the 1991 dream of everyone giving up their nukes and proliferation being prevented has failed miserably, so it’s back to plan A.

    Russia is only country that can afford high technology arms race. It hasn’t even started fracking to pollute ground water or increase debt level. It high efficient research, and economic system enable it sell more weopons cheaply.

    I would say Russian military spending is stretched to the brink right now. Only China can afford an arms race with the US.

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 547 total)