@halloweene – The antenna for Spectra is at the back if I’m not mistaken, this is something more akin to a bottle top at the front of the DDM-NG bar and isn’t on all Ms or all Rafales. I’ll show a picture or you’ll probably think I’m mad.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]258933[/ATTACH]
I have a question. On some planes equipped with DDM-NG, there is a little cap at the front of the bar where the DDM-NG is mounted (on fin), with DDM there was not and on some others there is not. Saw it in a Combat Aircraft feature. What is it?
The box indicates a Hellfire I believe. They were tested successfully on drone targets back in the 1980s. Apparently they even trialled an IIR version.
All fighter aircraft are fatigue tested as far as I know.
Did RN Phantoms have an internal gun?
I wouldn’t even hit eject over place. Must have been a reflex reaction, after which he thought, “ah crap, didn’t mean to do that.”
^^which is hardly the case anymore.
How close would you need to base a fighter jet to actuall drop a tactical nuke on Russia without having to deal with NC waste the next days.. inside Ukraine? Almost all Russian large Airbases are located far inside Russia.
The UK doesn’t have tactical nukes anymore. Depends where jet takes off from, e.g. RAF Akritori. Depends on mid-air refuelling.
Anyway, help me understand this.. The combat radius of a Tornado launched from Italy is roughly enough to reach the western part of Ukraine. Even in case of emergency they will never have reached Russia (unless assuming a kamikaze type mission).. What’s the use of free-fall nukes, then?
Well apart from mid-air refuelling, a long long long long time ago… before the wind, before the snow… there was a country, a country I know… called the USSR and its conjoined twin the Warsaw Pact, which existed inside part of that red circle.
One issue with buying Tornado fighter jets is that they lack the ability to carry nuclear weapons. Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey have a combined arsenal of roughly 200 B-61 gravity bombs as part of their NATO commitment, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
You sure about that? The WE.177 could.
I also understood those nukes to be US-controlled nukes residing in other NATO countries.
If the F-111 would have made a good fighter, the F-14 wouldn’t exist. But fighters usually can bomb fairly well because it’s the simpler of the two disciplines.
P.1154 would have made an interesting choice if it wasn’t cancelled.
Clean, there would be a few fighter in with a shot, but the F-111 could carry two 2,000lb bombs internally and a shed load of fuel.
But it could if ordered with A2G upgrade.
F-12 armed with AIM-54 and AGM-76.:cool:
The Harrier deserves a mention here somewhere too. Rough field and VTOL carrier capability, reasonably good record in air combat and ground attack.