Page 198 – Key Publishing

greekdude1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,029 total)

← 1 2 3 … 197 198 199 200 201 202 →

Author

Posts
May 30, 2002 at 10:46 pm in reply to: Excess Baggage #661491

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Excess Baggage

I’m guessing the 757 blew, but the L1011 swallowed.

GD1

May 29, 2002 at 10:22 pm in reply to: Worst C/S #661869

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Worst C/S

Yeah they changed it, the people were outraged, and brought the “temple” scheme right back in no time!

GD1

May 29, 2002 at 10:12 pm in reply to: Sweets on take-off – a thing of the past? #661874

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Sweets on take-off – a thing of the past?

I’ve received Godiva chocolates after dinner on United on 2 or 3 occassions, out of several hudred trips with them. This was howwever, pre-9/11.

GD1

May 28, 2002 at 10:07 pm in reply to: Worst C/S #662123

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Worst C/S

I don’t mind the “Euro-white” trend, as long as the titling and the tail colors are good. I disagree on the anti-LH sentiments. Their titles are very bold, and their tail is classic. The grey belly and cowlings compliment the white very nicely. JAL is very similar. Classic crane on the tail, and the subtle little stip with the “JAL” is nice. The ugliest in my opinion is Southwest’s old scheme. Thank God they changed to primarily royal blue, as that old brown looked like sewage water. Considering SW is the primary player at my 2 home airports(ONT/LAX), change was definitely for the better.

GD1

May 24, 2002 at 10:01 pm in reply to: Best looking aircraft and livery? #662991

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Best looking aircraft and livery?

[updated:LAST EDITED ON 24-05-02 AT 10:17 PM (GMT)]Thanks for the help guys. Without further adeu, here’s my favorite aircraft/airline combo. I was fortunate enough to fly on this baby once(perhaps twice?).

Attachments:

May 24, 2002 at 5:05 pm in reply to: Best looking aircraft and livery? #663161

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Best looking aircraft and livery?

So I don’t have to contact the photographer before I post a pic then? Sorry if I’m being anal about this, I just don’t want to get in trouble.

GD1

May 23, 2002 at 11:35 pm in reply to: Best looking aircraft and livery? #663435

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Best looking aircraft and livery?

Can I just link to a photo from airliners.net? How does that work? I was just there and they have certain copywright laws. I notice most of the pictures some of you post on here are from that site. What do you guys do?

GD1

May 22, 2002 at 11:20 pm in reply to: Unusual way to land a 747 #663650

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Unusual way to land a 747

Forget it, I found it. Actually, the pic that Dazza posted here is an AirChina Cargo 747-200F. The ‘series’ that you referred to where it shows the 4 pictures and the full recovery is of an NCA 747-200F. Very similar in the initial photo right at touchdown, but you can tell the difference if you look at both of them.

GD1

May 22, 2002 at 9:58 pm in reply to: Unusual way to land a 747 #663654

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Unusual way to land a 747

Which categorie on Airliners.net do I go in order to fine these? Is there a link, perhaps?

GD1

May 22, 2002 at 7:45 pm in reply to: Airport picture of the day #663675

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Airport picture of the day

Yeah, 11 Korean and a token Asiana!

GD1

May 22, 2002 at 7:38 pm in reply to: Unusual way to land a 747 #663680

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Unusual way to land a 747

Did this aircraft make a full recovery for a normal landing? Or is this that China Airlines 747-400 that wound up floating in Kowloon bay where they had to blow the tailfin off as to not obstruct traffic? There does not appear to be any winglets on this thing, unless they are just not visible.

GD1

May 22, 2002 at 4:31 pm in reply to: So… the ERJ-170… how does it look? #663708

greekdude1
Participant

RE: So… the ERJ-170… how does it look?

Right Kabir, I’m not arguing with that. I’m just saying that they should have been designed with putting the engines in the back, in mind. But then, I’m not an engineer, what do I know! I just like the way RJ’s look, much better, when they have tail mounted engines. The look more “RJ-esque.” Or, if they have wing mounted engines, for the wings to be mounted on top the fuselage a la the Bae 146 and the Do 328/428Jet.

GD1

May 22, 2002 at 4:07 pm in reply to: Britannia Aiways aircraft naming #663723

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Becks

EVEN BETTER!

May 22, 2002 at 4:06 pm in reply to: Belgian Pic of the Week #663833

greekdude1
Participant

RE: Belgian Pic of the Week

[updated:LAST EDITED ON 22-05-02 AT 04:13 PM (GMT)]The bottom link does not work. The top link goes to a forum page with a small 737-500 pic on there.

GD1

May 22, 2002 at 4:02 pm in reply to: So… the ERJ-170… how does it look? #663837

greekdude1
Participant

RE: So… the ERJ-170… how does it look?

[updated:LAST EDITED ON 22-05-02 AT 04:04 PM (GMT)]The engines do look small, but if they were mounted on the fuselage in the rear, they would look normal. I think it looks too much like a ‘jet’ and not enough like a ‘regional jet.’ I also feel the same way about the Dornier 528/728/928Jets. Keep the engines in the back, and the fuselage lower to the ground for easy access!

GD1
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,029 total)

← 1 2 3 … 197 198 199 200 201 202 →