RE: Pic Of The Day-Soccer fever!
The only place England needs to show off, is on the soccer field. I read in the newspaper yesterday, during their stopover in Dubai en route to the World Cup, the British soccer team and their entourage (totalling roughly 120) ran up a hotel bill of roughly $54,000 U.S.! That’s a lot of drinking!
GD1
RE: Virgin Red-New US low cost airline
Once again, Mongu, you make very good points. Very logical, indeed. Either way, I just don’t see it happening. One company being from the UK, the other being from the U.S. What would the airline be called? Will it be branded into one, or will they retain their own identities/liveries? Where will the other OneWorld members fit in to this? Will they want a piece of the pie, as well?
GD1
RE: Pic Of The Day-Soccer fever!
You can pretty much count on LAX as the stopover. Varig usually has 2 dailies to LAX from Sao Paolo, one of which continues on to Tokyo, so, that would seem logical. I don’t know what their schedule has been like since 9/11, however. They might have even gone to 1 daily frequency. Either way, It it surprising they don’t use the MD11 as you mentioned, since that is the aircraft they use on the LAX/NRT run. Before the MD11, it was a 747-300.
GD1
RE: TORONTO AVIATION-YYZ
Perhaps, you should include a link or a URL here. Your instructions aren’t very specific.
GD1
RE: New low cost in UK
I think the union jack is what adds that extra spice to the livery, even though it doesn’t match the rest. If the tail was purple as well, I don’t think it would look as good. The union jack is what initially caught my eye when I saw it.
GD1
RE: Britannia Aiways aircraft naming
When are they going to name one after David Beckham? The registration could be G-BECK or G-BCKS. Great idea!
GD1
RE: Pic Of The Day-Soccer fever!
I like Portugal to win it all. My darkhorse pic is Croatia. Iv’e gone off on a tangent here…
GD1
RE: Manchester Commonwealth games…Airport Traffi
What games are these?
GD1
RE: Virgin Red-New US low cost airline
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 19-05-02 AT 09:27 PM (GMT)]You make very good points. However, obviously if this was up to the shareholders, it would be great for both airlines! Why the hell wouldn’t it! Unfortunately, whatever is best for the shareholders, isn’t always best for the industry. Why do you think the United/USAirways merger was shot down? Because it would have created a huge monopoly in the US domestic sector by giving them nearly 50% of the market and increasing their east coast routes where USAirways dominates, not to mention strenthening their presence in Europe, where they currently only serve 8 destinations. The only reason the AA/TWA merger happened, was because TWA was finished. They were going to have to file for Chapter 11 bankrupcy protection for seemingly the 3rd time in the last decade. So even if AA and BA are both ‘troubled,’ they are by no means hanging by their last thread, so to speak. You mention that other airlines would be forced to use Gatwick. Yeah, well, the bottom line is, they don’t want to, nor should they be forced to! USAirways, Northwest, Continental, and Delta should be alloted some slots at LHR as well, and perhaps forcing AA/BA to take some more slots at LGW as a result. Finally, you mention it being good for competition, I don’t recall when any mega-merger was ever good for competition. When you have a giant dominating the market, they set their price, and everybody else is forced to comply. Sure, you have a little guy come in and set low prices and the big boy lowers theirs even further till it bankrupts the little guy, and it’s end of story for them. Once in a while you get one that sticks, like easyjet, Southwest, etc. But for the most part, they don’t last. That’s the very reason I refuse to buy fuel from Mobile/Exxon. Their the bigboys and regardless of what OPEC does, they control the market. Regardless of what the UK gov’t decides, the US gov’t just won’t let this happen, for all the right reasons. I have 2 words: MICRO SOFT.
GD1
P.S. I forgot to address the FRA/AMS issue. Hell, if I’m a biz traveler and I had to choose a transit airport other than LHR, I wouldn’t go via LGW either! I’d much prefer FRA or AMS. Both, very nice airports. If the UK econonmy suffers, then so be it.
RE: Virgin Red-New US low cost airline
Why would it never happen? Let’s sit back and think about this. AA is the biggest airline in the world. BA is the biggest in Europe, the 4th biggest in the world, and owner of the majority of the slots at the busiest airport in the world in terms of international traffic. So these 2 coming together under one common name and livery, perhaps, to create a mammoth airline that nobody can touch with practically all the slots at Heathrow, the majority at DFW, and already huge at Miami, Los Angeles, Kennedy and Chicago-O’Hare. I just don’t think the logistics of this are aesthetically pleasing to the airline industry, at large. They should just be happy with a codeshare/alliance deal similar to Star.
GD1
RE: Airport picture of the day
What ever happened to Virgin Sun anyway? Everything else Branson does seems to be very successful.
GD1
RE: New low cost in UK
I think that’s a great livery! Very unique. Better than Southwest’s old one.
GD1
RE: JAL best by far
Air New Zealand is not the only airline that asks you to put the blinds down while they are showing a movie. I’ve flown on numerous airlines that have the same policy. In my opinion, it’s not that big a deal. In fact, I think it’s a pretty decent policy considering the open blinds bring in considerable glare making it difficult for the majority of the passengers to watch the movie. Comet, you still must be pretty pissed about that whole ANZ ordeal considering I’ve seen no less than 3 mentions of it on here. Was it truly that bad? I’ll admit, if a stewardess did to me what she did to you, racing over and slamming it shut like the way you described, I would have been less than pleased. However, you did get to see the flightdeck. I think that should make up for hell of a lot, considering I don’t know of any airlines that allow that to happen, especially after 9/11. The only time I’ve had the pleasure of seeing what the view looks like from the windscreen is the time I ‘sneaked’ up to business class on an LH A310 ATH-FRA flight. The only reason that happened is because the pilot had the door open so I just peaked through. I’ve had bad experiences with ‘bitchy’ flight attendants in the past, as well. That’s going to happen on occasion. Air NewZealand was voted one of the top economy class cabins/seats a few years back, along with the likes of Virgin and Cathay Pacific, I believe. That didn’t happen by accident. I’ve flown ANZ twice from L.A. to Sydney, and I encountered great in flight service. Now, that doesn’t necessarily mean that everyone who flies ANZ will, because my likes and everybody else’s obviously differ. The point I’m trying to make is, you coming on here and ‘advising’ us not to fly Air NewZealand, just because they have a policy of lowering the blinds while a film is on during the daytime, is absolutely ludicrous. Tell us you had a bad experience, end of story. Shall we start putting an embargo on every airline that someone has a bad experience on? The list would become rather long. My advice? Go to the website, and send an email, letting them know your amount of mileage you have, your frequent flyer number, how much you love their company, etc. I’ve gotten a few nice vouchers by doing that. But hey, that’s just me. I’ve gone on long enough….
GD1
RE: Virgin Red-New US low cost airline
A mega code-share deal is one thing. AA puts BA flight numbers on all their US domestic routes, BA puts AA flight numbers on all their connections out of LHR. But these 2 merging? That would never happen, even if the U.S. allowed it.
GD1
RE: Jal best in the air?
I’ve flown ANZ twice between L.A. and Sydney, once in business class, and once in a ecomony. Both times I’ve had a very favorable experience. They’re easily the 2nd best airline I have flown.
GD1