dark light

XR537 (G-NATY)

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 7 posts - 46 through 52 (of 52 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • XR537 (G-NATY)
    Participant

    No, but Tonka toys…

    … are going to do a Coca-Cola spanner set with realistic-looking breakers yard…or was it Meccano that I spoke to…??? :confused:

    I suppose we could re-do the rear reg. decals on XR537… scrub off the ‘XR’ and put an ‘N’ on her, ready for her crate! 😮 Muhahahahahaha :diablo:

    Air-Fixed have also now got to make the slippers for her too…

    But, yes, you guessed… as soon as we decide to put slippers on her to INCREASE HER RANGE AND THEREFORE ALLOW MORE AIRSHOW ENTHUSIASTS TO SEE HER …

    Scene: A smoky room in the Royal Aeronautical Decals Society club building in the famous aviation town of Prattle-by-the-Widdle.
    The smell of dead furniture, modelling glue and yellow paint fills the air. On nearly every surface, empty saucers with dried up squares of paper in them litter the scene. Why? Who knows… it is a long tradition known only to the Fellows of this esteemed Society. Some believe that it is an offering, of some form, to the God of Flight.
    In the corner, two elderly chaps sit in silence, in dusty armchairs, pouring over the latest copy of Aviation Decals Monthly. One puffs on an oft-failing pipe, whilst the other has a long-finished cheroot stub in an antique cigarette holder.
    Suddenly, one of them, coughs (more a shocked choke) in surprise as he reads of the latest plans to refurbish an old historic aircraft…

    “But, I say, old chap… Look at this! I don’t recall the Arrows ever having slipper tanks?”, as he puffed his pipe, coughed, and cursed as ash fell on his Irving jacket from the jolt…
    “Now you say so, old boy, I don’t recall either”, replied Sir Tarquin ‘Crusty’ Fotherington-Smythe, Hon. Secretary to the Decal Committee.
    “Well, it’s a damn liberty, if you ask me, old chap…didn’t have this sort of nonsense in our time…whatever next?”, stroking his handlebar moustache and raising an eyebrow to his old wingman ‘Crusty’.
    “I suppose they’ll be wanting to fly the blasted thing next!”
    “Damn cheek, if you ask me…everyone knows that planes were designed to sit on the ground.”
    “Absolutely….couldn’t have put it better myself. ‘Sit on the ground’…exactly, old chap, just like us. Best place for them! Without a doubt! Never going anywhere, never doing anything. Where do they get these silly modern ideas about flying further distance from?”
    “Hear, hear… status quo, quid pro quo, et ceterae, et cet…”, as he fell into a deep sleep. 😉

    And I haven’t even begun to talk about smoke generators… 😮

    XR537 (G-NATY)
    Participant

    Actually, the Navy man said…

    “Sea Vixen? I see no Sea Vixen”, as he lowered his telescope to his side.

    And we replied, “Neither will any other ****er… unless someone comes up with one hundred and twenty thousand of your finest English pounds”.

    “Well, we’ve got a few barrels of ships biscuits”, said he. “Will they do?”

    “Hmmmm…how about a gross of those fine navy uniform shirt buttons”, said we. :rolleyes:

    okay…okay… taking the wee-wee, I know…but now some great news for the Honourable Fellows of the National Association for the Proper and Correct Representation of Service Markings on Decommisioned and Mothballed Military Aircraft that No One In the UK Would Otherwise Give a Rat’s Ar*e About…
    … AKA NAPCRSMDMMANOUKGRAA

    I spoke to one of the famous-marque injected plastic model companies this afternoon, and they have agreed to release a Red-Bull-markings version of G-CVIX. It will be called the Air-Fixed De Havilland Sea Vixen model and straplined on the box with “Amazing choice of Naval-gazing yellow ‘n’ red Utopian Design or Practical Red Bull decals”.
    The box cover will show the naval design with wheels down (and includes a small sachet of hangar dust to sprinkle), whilst the Red Bull design will show… unless I’m very much mistaken from the drafts they sent… the aircraft with wheels up…obviously in flight. 😉

    They are also going to look into producing a special new Gnat T1 model with tomatoey-orange paintwork (to give it that authentic special faded paint effect through being left in a hangar and nearly broken up for bits) with decomposed-charge ejector seats, special spider-infested fan blades, and realistic life-like perished tyres… oh yes, and the obligatory sachet of hangar dust.

    The headline title on the Gnat box will be “Genuine part of British Jet heritage” with the strapline of “As seen exclusively by a few lucky museum visitors.”

    The Gnat model will also come with authentic looking shipping container with choice of various US State decals, so you can choose where she would otherwise end up. 😮
    :p

    _____________________________________________________
    “Oh! I have stripped the curly fronds of ashphalt, by starting up on the non-jet pan…
    Pulled back the stick, and torched a brace of God-knows-what…
    lapwings, I think they were…just a smell of roast game and a weird jolt through the airframe!” 😮

    XR537 (G-NATY)
    Participant

    Cheques made payable to…

    I’m happy to take any sort of criticism about a plane lying in a hangar slowly mothballing, but here we see the same old naggety-nag, “Your decals aren’t pukka”…yadda, yadda, yap, yap…bang, bang, bang….[as the Duracell bunny slowly fades into the distance], just because it doesn’t have her former RN service colours.

    Okay, so now the p**s-take sarcastic bit…

    Well, we went to the Navy and said could we [pretty please] have £60k for new paint and another £120k a year to keep her flying…. and the answer was “**** right off!” …Yeah right, only in our dreams…and we were promptly marched out to the guardroom to await the Navy doctor and his ‘Certifiable’ forms…

    So, we went to Red Bull and said…
    …………………………………………etc., [but with an extra ‘pretty’] 😉
    and guess what? 😀

    So guys (particularly the ones who get all crotchety and start whinging like old fish-wives in the street, because we didn’t use the proper Airfix-approved paint job…and it doesn’t quite match the model hanging by cotton from their spare room ceiling (also collecting dust))…

    1) it’s now flying, so so-called aviation ‘enthusiasts’ get to see her fly.
    2) the paintwork’s new and she now looks well-maintained, which she is.
    3) 99.9% of people who attend airshows wouldn’t even know what colour she’s supposed to be…”So, on my Fairford Attendee Customer Feedback Form, I so*ding told them I did, I wrote ‘Nag, nag, nag, why isn’t the Sea Vixen in Navy yellow?….yadda, yadda, b*tch, b*tch…or next year I won’t come along’… I did, I tell you… that’s told them, that has”; and
    4) Precisely put by someone above…”What colour’s your Sea Vixen” :p , or “When are you having your Sea Vixen put in Navy yellow decals?”

    What everyone has to realise is that is costs a LOT of money… as in a LOT… as in Sh**loads…to keep these things flying, and we haven’t quite cross-fertilised an acorn with a twenty-pound note yet, let alone got it to bear fruit!!! :rolleyes:

    So, if you’re happy to raise six-figures annually between you (the whingers that is), then I’m sure we can power it over to the paintshop and get her ‘real-deal’ decals soaked in the giant saucer ready for transfer.

    While we’re on the subject, G-NATY would have had to be painted something else, unless we had worked out a viable way to get her restored and keep her flying…

    But, I suppose we would then have had no end of b*tching about a former Red Arrow being painted in Bully colours…

    So, we decided, no… we’ll keep her authentic… fork out another barrow-full of money to get her painted properly…but do you think everyone’s happy? :confused: Not a chance… the self-flogging brigade have to start their drumming again, with inane comments about “Is she actually entitled to wear Reds Gnats colours?”, “I say, old chap, that’s a damned cheek isn’t it…they say she only served a few years”…..[yawn]

    So, for those who added comments like “outrageous” and “shame”, etc. cheques can be made payable to “De Havilland Aviation Ltd”, and sent to Hangar 600 at EGHH. Then, you may personally visit and personally supervise whatever paintjob you would like…you can even have your Forum moniker painted in pink along the side if you so wish. :rolleyes:

    In this game, you’re damned if you try and keep these birds flying, and you’re damned if you don’t.

    Just start appreciating the effort and resources that go into these projects before sounding off in such an ill-informed and pious manner…

    here endeth the lesson…

    P.S. And ‘yes’, I DO (actually) know what I’m talking about… I’m one of the Directors of De Havilland :p
    _____________________________________________________
    “Oh! I have stripped the curly fronds of ashphalt, by starting up on the non-jet pan…
    Pulled back the stick, and torched a brace of God-knows-what…
    lapwings, I think they were…just a smell of roast game and a weird jolt through the airframe!” 😮

    in reply to: Gnat XR537 #1314022
    XR537 (G-NATY)
    Participant

    Well proud, indeed…

    well done XR537 I shall now go a bash my thoroughly ill informed source repeatedly round the head for giving me duff jen. Your boys at De Havillands should be proud of XR537 she looked fantastic when I last saw her

    Thanks…we’re very proud of the jet … but, also, the engineers who have slogged to get her to this state.

    By the way, if you want to know the definitive history of the plane… as there are other lumps of bulls**t stuck to postings on other threads 😡 – then it’s probably best to read Victor Bingham’s book, or consult someone like Adrian Balch, who knows a thing or two about the history of the plane. Saying that, we have made additional extensive enquiries to establish her exact logbook entries with those in the Reds (sorry, Arrows) who flew her, and she was, definitely, in the squadron from Autumn 1975, not from 1978 onwards as originally thought.

    http://www.redarrows.com/images/xr537-20060407.JPG
    http://www.redarrows.com/images/xr537-20060407b.JPG

    in reply to: How many Gnats left flying #1314249
    XR537 (G-NATY)
    Participant

    Not true at all…

    Not quite true! XR537 only served with the Red Arrows during the last two seasons, 1978-79, during which time she had ‘ROYAL AIR FORCE’ in large bold lettering on the nose. Prior to that she was with 4 FTS at Valley, during the period that the Red Arrows Gnats wore the nose ‘lightning flash’, which was 1968-1977. I was consulted by the owners and we decided that this scheme was the longest-lived and best well known, so here you have it.

    The above statement, about XR537 only serving between 78-79, is actually inaccurate.

    537 was actually transferred to the Reds in Aug 1975 and served as one of the spare aircraft. During 1976, she was used by Red 10 as the spare ‘transit’ aircraft on many occasions, and used by the leader Dickie Duckett on more than one actual public display in the Red 1 kite position.

    We have the actual log book confirmations from those very pilots themselves.

    She was also photographed in Red 1 position during an Arthur Gibson air-to-air photo shoot, and these photos were subsequently used in the Official Red Arrows brochures of 1977. The images were also printed in the 25th Anniversary book, again showing 537 in Red 1 position.

    Following the wind-down of Gnats in 1979, she was transferred to become a maintainance airframe and taxying practice jet, hence her relatively well-kept condition.

    Finally, despite all the doubters, she WILL be flying again.

    One of her proudest moments as Red 1’s kite…

    http://www.redarrows.com/images/XR537-001-1976.jpg

    and now the close up… in case you can’t see the markings in that picture…

    http://www.redarrows.com/images/XR537asRed1.jpg

    in reply to: Gnat XR537 #1314252
    XR537 (G-NATY)
    Participant

    Just to dispel some of the ill-informed rumours …

    …as there seems to be more than a generous helping of bovine scatological deposits, being flung around here…

    1) All aircraft flown under civilian ownership wishing to use original military markings must apply to the RAF. In 537s case, she is the ONLY genuine Red Arrows Gnat that will be airworthy (i.e. one that actually served in the squadron… 537 even took the Red 1’s kite position for part of 1976) – the others have borrowed the registrations. Therefore, the RAF obviously felt that this did warrant consideration when making their decision.

    2) The RAF would (understandably) be concerned about any ‘civilian’ team dressed as red, as the public perception would be that they are the ‘Red Arrows’. If you showed the average Joe Public a display of (e.g.) 5 red Gnats, they wouldn’t know the difference between them and the real thing. Any problems/incidents/accidents (God forbid) would then bring immediate and damaging attention to the real deal team, and at a time when certain elements of the Civil Service see the Reds as an “overhead”. We all know that given half a chance, our illustrious Britishness-identity-bashing luvvies in the cabinet (and their army of faceless wonders) would grab any opportunity to get the red pen out. 😮
    The RAF have, it would seem, taken the sensible decision to ensure that any historic Reds aircraft are represented in the absolute correct manner (e.g. publicity, naming, etc.) and displayed accordingly – i.e. not in formation teams. – and will probably ask all owners to respond accordingly, us included.

    3) XR537 (G-NATY) will be flown as an ex-military jet – all this talk of PLCs and commercial tie-ups is total nonsense and just the usual murmurs from those who don’t actually really know. 😡 If you want anymore specific details, then you can email me directly, or wait until the actual launch date press release, or watch the BBC documentary. 😉
    Additionally, 537 will be flown to help promote the RAF’s heritage and that of the British aircraft industry – the days when we could build a jet or two.
    Finally on this point, the nonsense about vast sums of money being made are the usual preposterous tosh that does seem to going around the World via the jet-stream. If you had any idea about how much it costs to get this thing in the air, and the ongoing maintenance costs, then you’d realise that it’s not a money-making “commercial” venture.

    4) The redarrows.com website is NOT a commercial venture, but was setup many years ago to help promote the team in a positive light (the former owners of the domain name had set it up as a porn site!) and help promote various displays that were raising money for good causes, in particular the Bournemouth seafront displays. Since 1996, just over £100,200 has been raised for charities including the RAFBF, Macmillan Fund, Julia’s House, and the country’s ONLY dedicated autism care centre in the UK.
    In addition, the site helps raise money through online auctions and competitions, and serious amounts of money have been presented to the team at RAF Scampton for their nominated charities (photos of these handovers available upon request).
    RAFAT gave their blessing to the site when first setup, and we continue to have a good relationship with them.
    The site is currently being completely overhauled to incorporate how the Gnat will continue that fund-raising side of things, and given a new design on the other pages. There will also be an extensive section covering her history and photographs from the teams past. The old pages exist until such times as the launch.

    5) The new operating company that is being formed to keep 537 flying, will also operate a registered charitable Trust into which a proportion of any fees will go (e.g. airshow payments, etc.). The trustees will be formed of the owners of the company, lay members of the public, and two former Arrows pilots (now retired from the RAF) with the sole remit to choose eligible charities annually and allocate the funds accordingly.
    The talk of a “PLC” from “reliable” sources is a nonsense.

    6) 954 won’t fly again (I think that’s fairly obvious! :rolleyes: ) but we are hoping to convert the airframe into a working Gnat simulator, so that she still lives in spirit. The viability of that project will be looked into when 537 is airborne. Again, 954 would have just rotted away and been skipped, if we hadn’t have intervened.

    If anyone wants any further info, then please raise the questions here, or email me directly.

    Hopefully, that will put an end to some of the sillies that have been doing the rounds. 🙂

    Finally, why is it that this country is so damn good at self-bashing anything constructive??? :confused: This jet could have (easily) been sent to US for spares and then we’d have no end of harping on here about nobody in the UK being bothered about saving our jet heritage.
    Yet, as soon as we do something positive to reverse that trend, we get all sorts of inane comments about special RAF privilege, yadda, yadda, yap, yap, nag….

    Just be thankful you’ll get to see one of these superb jets back in the air, be it in ‘official’ 70s decals or not – and if it is (with the RAF’s blessing).. it might just help reverse this apathy about restoring a bit of pride into what was once a bluddy good (and proud) nation of aircraft designers, builders, flyers and engineers… and still is, in some quarters!

    in reply to: Gnat XR537 #1374840
    XR537 (G-NATY)
    Participant

    The official word…

    … from the horse’s mouth.

    Yes, we are getting 537 back to flight status, and all is going well. 🙂

    We also secured XR954 for spares and panels, etc. as it was being left to rot in a shed over the other side of the field 🙁

    Seats are being re-primed and engine tests should start within the next two weeks, all electrical and engine cold engine checks have been completed. Respray went ahead six weeks ago so she no longer looks that off-red tomatoey-orange colour (too many days sat under fluorescent lights in the museum, methinks) and she is now back to pukka signal-red and minus all the graffiti that the airframe boys scribed on her.

    More news will follow…

    http://www.redarrows.com/images/xr537-006.jpg

Viewing 7 posts - 46 through 52 (of 52 total)